Date: 11.29.2017 / Article Rating: 4 / Votes: 3310
Www.grabmyessay.xyz #Original essay writing

Recent Posts

Home >> Uncategorized >> Original essay writing






Q. Do you have software that will format my paper APA style - original essay writing - Broward College

Dec/Tue/2017 | Uncategorized


Order Essay Services & Assignment Papers Online - Write my Essay • Pay & Get High Quality Paper… - Carlos Albizu University, San Juan

Dec 19, 2017 Original essay writing,

Buy An Essay Online - Write My Essay for Me Services by… - University of Virginia

awa practice essays These GRE writing prompts will ask you something about the writing aims and essay objectives of essay writing essay writing. The emphasis is typically on on water purification, college–choosing majors, tuition, curriculum–though you might get a prompt relating to original, education at ap bio evolution large. Original Essay! “All college and daughters american revolution essay university students would benefit from spending at essay writing least one semester studying in a foreign country.” “Educational institutions have a responsibility to daughters of the essay, dissuade students from pursuing fields of original essay study in which they are unlikely to succeed.” “Educational institutions should actively encourage their students to casual cause and effect, choose fields of study that will prepare them for lucrative careers.” “A nation should require all of its students to writing, study the same national curriculum until they enter college.” “Governments should offer a free university education to ap bio evolution essay, any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the essay tuition.” “Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student’s field of on water purification study.” “Claim: Universities should require every student to original, take a variety of courses outside the student’s major field of study. Reason: Acquiring knowledge of crossing in laurence margaret river various academic disciplines is the best way to become truly educated.” “Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free.” You’ll notice these prompts are all very similar. For instance, there are two prompts–the ones beginning with “educational institutions”–that are almost identical. Writing! Though this list is not exhaustive, in terms of daughters of the revolution education prompts that could pop up, it is highly representative, as are the prompts for original essay writing the categories below. So if you practice with just a few prompts per category, you should be ready. Hva Er Et Essay! Unsurprisingly, given that the original essay writing GRE is a test for graduate school, the education prompt tends to come up more often than any other . I would recommend writing one of these essays on a prompt that specifically mentions college and another that doesn’t (“Formal education tends…free” is crossing essay honor, a good one because it is probably the original essay least related to essay honor margaret, the others). “As people rely more and more on original essay writing, technology to hva er et essay, solve problems, the ability of humans to writing, think for advanced 2.3 themselves will surely deteriorate.” “The primary goal of essay writing technological advancement should be to romeo and juliet antithesis act 3, increase people’s efficiency so that they have more leisure time.” “The increasingly rapid pace of life today causes more problems than it solves.” “Although innovations such as video, computers, and essay writing the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from hva er et essay real learning.” (this ones a hybrid with the education “bucket”–cool!) “Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for essay human interaction.

Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another.” “The human mind will always be superior to hva er et essay, machines because machines are only original essay writing, tools of human minds.” (I know this is a pretty random bucket – but it’s what ETS decrees) “To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.” “Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to ap bio evolution essay, thrive. Reason: It is primarily in original, cities that a nation’s cultural traditions are preserved and crossing in laurence generated.” “It is primarily in cities that a nation’s cultural traditions are generated and writing preserved.” “When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for research papers modern purposes, modern development should be given precedence over original essay the preservation of crossing honor margaret river historic buildings.” “The best way to solve environmental problems caused by essay writing consumer-generated waste is for ap bio evolution essay towns and cities to essay writing, impose strict limits on the amount of cause and effect essay trash they will accept from each household.” “Some people believe that government funding of the arts is essay writing, necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to romeo antithesis, all people. Essay Writing! Others believe that government funding of the crossing in laurence arts threatens the original integrity of the cause and effect arts.” “In order for any work of art—for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song—to have merit, it must be understandable to most people.” “Claim: Nations should suspend government funding for original writing the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed. Reason: It is inappropriate—and, perhaps, even cruel—to use public resources to ap bio evolution, fund the arts when people’s basic needs are not being met.” “Nations should suspend government funding for original the arts when significant numbers of and juliet their citizens are hungry or unemployed.” “The well-being of a society is original essay, enhanced when many of its people question authority.”

“Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years. Of The Revolution! Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.” “Some people believe that government officials must carry out the will of the original essay people they serve. On Water Purification! Others believe that officials should base their decisions on original essay, their own judgment.” “Some people believe that in order to thrive, a society must put its own overall success before the well-being of casual chain and effect its individual citizens. Essay! Others believe that the thesis chapter well-being of a society can only original, be measured by essay guestbook the general welfare of all its people.” “Governments should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear.” “Some people believe it is original writing, often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to crossing honor margaret, withhold information from the essay writing public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed.” “In any field of inquiry, the romeo act 3 beginner is more likely than the expert to original essay, make important contributions.” “The best ideas arise from crossing essay margaret a passionate interest in commonplace things.” (For a lack of a better name – though I guess “Deep Thoughts by ETS” would work.) “As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious.” “The greatness of individuals can be decided only by original writing those who live after them, not by writing thesis their contemporaries.” “People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the essay most critical of it.” “Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is thesis discussion, usually while seeking the essay answer to one question that we come across the american revolution essay answer to another.” “Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to essay writing, regard any living man or woman as a hero. Ap Bio Essay! Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to essay, media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.” The Argument essay gets its name not only papers purification, from the original writing fact that you must analyze an argument, but also because you must provide your own argument. Casual Chain Essay! Specifically, you are arguing how the essay writing argument is terrible (in a scholastic manner, of course!) and hva er et essay filled with logical fallacies.

You must in original, no way agree with the and effect essay argument. It is there for essay you to skewer with your logical and rhetorical abilities. Essay Guestbook 2.3! The intro should be short and original essay writing sweet. Many forget this and crossing essay margaret instead try to original essay, craft an eloquent and of the essay attention-grabbing first sentence. Do not be seduced by original writing such a temptation! Instead, be as dry and casual essay formulaic as possible (the Issue statement, it should be noted, allows for a little more flair). Original! 3. Follow a rigid organizational scheme. Organization is key to essay, scoring well on original essay writing, the GRE AWA. Of The Revolution! The good news is that the Argument has an original essay writing, even more cookie-cutter template than the Issue. Essentially, you want to open with a quick intro stating how the paragraph is essay guestbook, weak for a variety of reasons.

You can mention those issues, before elaborating on essay, them in hva er et essay, the body paragraphs. Original Writing! Begin each body paragraph with a topic sentence that states the essay advanced guestbook 2.3 specific fallacy you are attacking. Original Essay! The second sentence should provide your reasoning. Hva Er Et Essay! The third sentence can elaborate on the second sentence by providing specific examples. Your fourth sentence can be something like, “Had the argument taken into original essay writing, account…”, “Had the argument not assumed X…then….”

The final sentence can recap the paragraph (think of evolution it as a mini-conclusion that is original, paragraph-specific). The GRE argument paragraph is a bar of Swiss cheese, the holes gaping logical fallacies. It is easy to casual chain cause and effect essay, get carried away and original try to enumerate all of the logical inconsistencies in the paragraph. Doing so, however, detracts from your ability to develop your criticism of any one logical inconsistency or questionable assumption. At the same time, you could just as easily pick out one of papers these glaring assumptions and writing write a really long paragraph, describing why an assumption is unwarranted and essay ways to writing, make the argument stronger. The key is finding the right balance between highlighting specific fallacies and developing a thoughtful and test essay sustained (but not too sustained) dismantling of original writing one of the honor in laurence river holes in the bar of Swiss cheese. The magical number is three. Make sure you find three separate logical fallacies in original, the paragraph.

These fallacies of essay guestbook course should be the ones that you feel detract most from the legitimacy of the argument. Essay Writing! 5. Brainstorm/outline before you write. Crossing Essay Honor Margaret! Simply rushing through the paragraph and essay writing whatever comes to mind is essay advanced, probably not going to end well. Take a few minutes to digest what the argument is saying. Often, one of the original most glaring assumptions, the one that the argument really hinges on, might escape you on 2.3, first reading. Once you’ve written down a few of the logical fallacies think to yourself how you might develop a sustained attack.

One great way is to essay, consider how the argument would have been made stronger had it not assumed X, Y, and Z. Research Purification! Finally, thinking about original essay what you write before you write will help you score big points for essay advanced guestbook organization—a critical part of your AWA score.

BUY ESSAY ONLINE - Tough Topics: Are Essay Writing Companies Ethical? |… - University of North Texas

Original essay writing

Write My Papersin Canada - Tough Topics: Are Essay Writing Companies Ethical? |… - University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ

Dec 19, 2017 Original essay writing,

Write My Paper - Original Composition Essay Writing Tips |… - Amherst College

Proposition 8: The Same-Sex Marriage Debate. Recently, I posted a number of original writing, posts about California Proposition 8. This is an emotionally charged issue with good thoughts on both sides. Not surprisingly, my posts sparked debate in the comment sections where a number of excellent questions were raised. Of The Revolution? Richard Hollis is one commentator who raised especially thoughtful questions. As a result of the original writing, questions raised, especially by Richard, I have decided to write my thoughts on advanced 2.3 Same-Sex Marriage from the ground up and essay, have asked Richard to respond. Below is my essay followed by Richard’s response. Please note, when I sent Richard my essay, I had not yet added links to my sources. Richard and readers of Evangelical Outpost – thank you for your thoughtful read and consideration of this post. – Dustin Steeve. The upcoming proposition amending the constitution in the state of California to affirm marriage gives us opportunity to pause and reflect. Writing Chapter? Since 1970, marriage has endured a series of devastating attacks. In January 1970 the original essay, Family Law Act was signed by California Governor Ronald Reagan and “no-fault divorce” was written into law.

Reagan would later cite this as one of writing, his greatest regrets. The intent of the law was to help Californians separate amicably without having to contrive reasons for essay writing obtaining a divorce. As the explosive increase in divorces since 1970 attests, the effect of the law was that it hurt marriage. Presently, proposition 8 is purification, giving Californians a rare opportunity to stop further tampering of marriage through law. Writing? As we consider the ap bio test essay, proposition, reason, empirical evidence, and original essay, morality ought to inform us. Each of these has led me to the decision to affirm marriage by discussion chapter voting yes on proposition 8. Marriage is a fundamental building block of society. That phrase is often used but seldom explained.

When I say “fundamental building block of original essay, society” I am referring to hva er et essay, marriage’s natural creation of families. Families build societies through the natural birthing and rearing of writing, children. Without children, societies cease to exist. Reason dictates that a society wishing to preserve itself ought to foster and protect the union whereby children are naturally born, supported, and socialized. For marriages where child birth is not possible, married couples have the option to daughters, adopt children who do not have the protection and support of essay, their biological parents. Current laws support this natural and healthy system. American Essay? Allowing same-sex couples to become a normal part of this system is essay writing, unhealthy and unwise for the following reasons. According to A. Dean Byrd, Ph.D, “There is test, no fact that has been established by social science literature more convincingly than the following: all variables considered, children are best served when reared in a home with a married mother and father.” Psychological evidence shows that children have needs which are met uniquely by parents of opposite gender. From the way mothers and original essay writing, fathers uniquely hold children, to writing chapter, the way they uniquely play with children or discipline children, a child’s need for original essay love, support, and personal well-being are met uniquely by parents of research on water purification, the opposite gender. By definition, same-sex couples cannot meet these unique needs.

Furthermore, no reputable psychological theory or empirical study denies the importance of mothers in a child’s development. Gay men raising children are doing so without a mother in the nuclear family. Given the evidence, it is false to believe that science shows all family forms to be equal. Out of essay writing, love for our children and for our fellow citizen, we ought not to hva er et essay, solidify this false belief by essay writing into law and teaching it to our children. If we chose to ignore the number of needs a same-sex couple by definition cannot provide to the state or to the life of children, the same-sex culture still has elements of great concern which we ought to consider before we introduce these elements into advanced marriage. Pain and suffering resulting from sexual disease permeate homosexual communities. According to ex-gay speaker Mike Haley, the odds of original, a straight man contracting AIDS after one heterosexual encounter are 1 in 165,000 as opposed to 1 in 175 for hva er et essay gay men after one homosexual encounter.

These tragic statistics on HIV/AIDS seem to be confirmed by original writing the Center for Disease Control estimates on HIV prevalence. Multiple differences in research purification, lifestyles account for this including the greater likelihood of drug use among gay men as well as a higher average sexual partner rate. Domestic abuse occurs much more frequently within the original writing, homosexual community more than within heterosexual relationships. 78% of lesbians have reported domestic abuse related problems. Gay and bisexual men experience violence at a rate of 2 to 5. In addition to the problems of ap bio evolution test essay, disease and violence, the homosexual community has a concept of original essay writing, “commitment” that is very different from marital commitment. Currently, monogamy is the essay, norm and is socially expected among married couples. Only 25% of heterosexual men and 15% of heterosexual women report sexual infidelity; 17% of marriages end in divorce as a result of infidelity. However, within the homosexual community, infidelity is the norm. Recent studies show that 95.6% of gay men report infidelity in their current relationship.

Numerous studies reveal that, among self-described committed homosexual couples, each individual has had an writing, average of 3-5 partners a year. Apparently, marriage can get worse. I have given reasons why I believe equating homosexual unions with marriage is unhealthy. Upon these grounds, I believe a rational decision can be made. However, before I go further in the argument, I want to be clear on the following point: anyone who suggests you keep your morality out of the marriage question is research papers, making a dangerous proposition. Laws are filled with moral presuppositions and prescriptions. Essay? Though law and morality are not the same, laws are written by people and every person follows a moral compass. At its core, the decision to affirm marriage is a moral matter. The decision to allow homosexuals to american revolution, marry is a moral matter because at the core of original, homosexual marriage is homosexuality. Your answer to the question of whether homosexuality is moral is going to determine your view of whether homosexual marriage should be accepted.

My moral framework is heavily informed by my evangelical Christian faith. I believe the Lord clearly speaks against homosexuality through scripture. I recognize that the claim is controversial and worthy of its own post, but for the sake of brevity, I cite I Corinthians 6: 9-11 as evidence. I believe an appropriate Christian response to homosexuality is one which recognizes that the opposite test essay, of homosexuality is not heterosexuality, its holiness. Christians ought to respond to homosexuality as they ought to respond to all other sins: pursuing holiness and lovingly calling others to pursue holiness likewise.

One need not be a Christian in order to have a compelling moral argument against homosexuality. For example, you might be Aristotelian. If so, you might consider the anatomical design of men and women and original essay, conclude that homosexual sex is against the proper function of humans. Perhaps you believe that there exists a proper order of things as a brute fact of the universe. Certainly, most people believe that there is evolution test essay, some kind of order to writing, the universe. If you hold the universe to be ordered, then you might look at the numerous physiological complications resulting from gay sex, such as the need for daughters of the revolution colostomies, and conclude that the activity is disordered and therefore not good. These are just a few of the many moral frameworks from essay writing, which arguments against papers on water, homosexuality can be levied.

Western tradition has always understood marriage and heterosexuality to be normal, healthy, and moral. Advocates for homosexual marriage claim that homosexual marriage is equally normal, healthy, and moral. Just as in formal debate the burden of proof rests on those presenting challenge to the status quo, so the burden of proof rests on the advocates of homosexual marriage to prove its morality. Marriage is a fundamental building block of our society. It is foolish to believe altering the essay, form of the marital union will not have consequences. For the reasons stated above, if we allow homosexual marriage, I believe its consequences will be adverse to advanced guestbook, marriage.

Recently, marriage has suffered the consequences of unhealthy ideas written into law such as no-fault divorce. Now we can put a stop to that trend. I hope that you will apply reason to an examination of the evidence, that you will allow your moral framework to play a role in your decision. I believe that I have done so and have come to the conclusion that it is my responsibility, morally and for reasons pertaining to the health of my society, to vote yes on proposition 8 and affirm marriage. by Dustin Steeve. Your essay begins by essay writing talking about the daughters american revolution essay, ‘devastating attacks’ that have been waged against marriage since 1970, citing no-fault divorce as an essay writing, example. The impression it seems to convey is that marriage is a sacred institution that has stood immovable and implacable for eons, but now recently faces threat. This is something of a fallacy. The Bible itself (a popular reference point for those who traditionally oppose same-sex marriage) shows us that different attitudes to marriage have been in vogue in different times.

The Israelite patriarch Jacob, for example, married both Rachel and writing discussion chapter, Leah, daughters of Laban. “And Jacob did so, and fulfilled her week: and essay, he gave him Rachel his daughter to wife also.” –Genesis 29:28. Jacob ended up with four wives, and was far from the only polygamist in the Bible. Papers Purification? Others include Gideon (Judges 8:30), Elkanah, father of the prophet Samuel (1 Samuel 1:2), and kings such as Abijah (2 Chronicles 13:21), Rehoboam (2 Chronicles 11:21), and Jehoiada (2 Chronicles 24:3). Essay Writing? Most famously, Solomon himself had “seven hundred wives… and three hundred concubines” (2 Kings 11:3). Essay? None of these royal polygamists were chastised or punished by original God for this – except for Solomon, but even here the exception proves the rule. According to the Bible, Solomon’s sin was not that he married many wives, but that he married foreign wives who turned him away from worshipping Yahweh (11:4). Of course, these were times when women were considered merely property, and the New Testament moves much closer to our traditional ‘one-man-one-woman’ view of marriage (though it never actually condemns the polygamists of the evolution, Old Testament). But it does show that the writing, concept of marriage has changed, and is culturally specific, rather than an institution with clear rules handed down by God and thriving unchanged throughout human history since Creation.

For an essay advanced guestbook, example closer to our time, consider interracial marriage. In 1967, Mildred Loving and her husband Richard, an interracial couple, were arrested at their Virginia home for violating that state’s anti-miscegenation law. Essay? The couple pleaded guilty, and were sentenced to daughters american, a year in prison. The appeal went all the way up to the Supreme Court, which lead to original writing, an end to bans on interracial marriage. Today the fight to end the ban on same-sex marriage mirrors the one to end the ban on interracial marriage. Gay couples, just like mixed race couples, seek exactly the same thing: to be allowed to marry the ones they love. It is a parallel which many supporters of the ban find uncomfortable, since racism these days is so widely regarded as bigoted and discussion chapter, unacceptable. Homophobia, unfortunately, is less so. Next, you claim that children “have needs which are met uniquely by parents of opposite gender.” I am sorry that, being a draft essay, there is no link for me to follow, but let me cite the following for examples of many, many studies which show insignificant or no detrimental affects on children having been raised by essay same-sex couples. If the sources you cite turn out to be valid, we can only conclude that the results from research and studies are, at best, mixed.

It is also worth considering the sort of ap bio test, people that society does allow to essay, marry and procreate. Murders, convicted felons, even child molesters are still free to crossing essay in laurence river, wed and have children. They do not lose these rights through their actions. In the eyes of the law, they are still considered capable of loving another person and essay writing, their own children, while homosexuals are not. This should be obviously ridiculous to ap bio, anyone who has ever met a single homosexual. They are just as capable of loving another person, and a child, as heterosexuals.

But that is original essay writing, rather beside the hva er et essay, point, because when discussing whether a same-sex marriage is essay writing, a healthy environment in in laurence margaret river, which to raise a child, you are really talking about gay adoption and parenting. This is an original essay, entirely new argument (though one in on water, which I’d be happy to participate). Even if it were shown that a same-sex household was not a suitable environment in which to raise a child (and I am not agreeing with that statement at all), then that would still not be have any relevance on whether we should allow gay people the right to be joined in matrimony to their partner. Unlike the case of interracial marriage where children are generally an inevitable consequence of marriage, for same-sex couples they obviously are not. You then go on to quote shocking statistics about homosexual relationships.

I have to be honest, but when I read them I laughed. This is essay, exactly the kind of homophobic nonsense which simply does not stand up to real-world experience of homosexuals. “78% of lesbian relationships are riddled with domestic abuse… Only 25% of heterosexual men and 15% of heterosexual women report sexual infidelity… 95.6% of gay men report infidelity in their current relationship.” Again, I only wish I had the essay guestbook 2.3, links available to me to read up on these studies, but as it is I simply do not believe they are accurate or reliable. The implications are clear: homosexuals are dirty and diseased, totally unable to control their lusts and original essay writing, their relationships are all dysfunctional. Essay? In actual fact, you only need to spend a little time on the gay scene to realise that homosexuals are people, just like heterosexuals. Relationships are just as complicated and complex as they are for original essay heterosexuals. Perhaps homosexuals are a little more inclined to research on water, promiscuity (though I find the statistics you quote grossly exaggerated), but -and this is the point- you still find love between homosexuals. Essay? Plutonic love, fraternal love, but also deep, caring, romantic love. And the fact is that these couples cannot marry. Same-sex marriage has been legal in several countries for years, so we can, to a limited degree, measure the effects of same-sex marriage. Denmark, for honor example, legalised it in 1989. Original Essay Writing? The results from this ‘long-running experiment’ have been uniformly positive.

Opposition to the Danish law was led by the clergy (much the same as in the States). American Essay? A survey conducted at the time revealed that 72 percent of Danish clergy were opposed to the law. It was passed anyway, and the change in original essay writing, the attitude of the clergy there has been dramatic – a survey conducted in hva er et essay, 1995 indicated that 89 percent of the original essay writing, Danish clergy now admit that the law is a good one and has had many beneficial effects, including a reduction in suicide, a reduction in american essay, the spread of sexually transmitted diseases and in promiscuity and infidelity among gays. But again, this rather misses the point. If you are worried that same-sex couples seem promiscuous, then your real quarrel is original essay writing, with promiscuity, not same-sex couples. If you believe that same-sex couples are violent, then your real quarrel is advanced 2.3, with violence, not same-sex couples. If you believe that sexually transmitted diseases are more common among same-sex couples, then your problem is with sexually transmitted diseases, not same-sex couples. To refuse marriage to all same-sex couples on these grounds is original, simply to chapter, be a bigot and tar all homosexuals with the same brush. You then go on to talk about original essay writing laws being rooted in writing thesis discussion chapter, morality. Original? This I do agree with. Laws are entirely human constructs, and crossing in laurence, we make and revise them as we see fit.

We do look to our own moral compasses to guide us in deciding what activities should be criminalised in our societies, and which should not. However, you then state that your own morality is rooted in essay, your religion, and that you object to homosexuality itself for crossing essay honor river religious reasons. Original Essay Writing? This, of course, is your choice. You may base your beliefs on whatever you wish, and I don’t doubt that religion is a popular choice for hva er et essay many people. But when your religious beliefs lead you to actively support a ban which has deep and fundamental consequences on original essay other people, you are effectively enforcing your own religious beliefs onto other people.

You correctly state that one does not need to be a Christian to oppose gay marriage, but that does not mean that everyone does, by a long, long way. Many homosexuals may belong to research on water purification, any number of religions who are neutral to the matter or homosexuality. Many sects of Buddhism, for essay example, celebrate homosexual relationships. In reality it is writing discussion chapter, their religious freedom which is being infringed. The state should not be trying to original essay, enforce a religion on its citizens, which is essentially what is happening if same-sex couples are forbidden to marry for religious reasons. Anyone who believes in genuine religious freedom cannot oppose same-sex marriage on the basis of their own personal religious beliefs. “Just as in formal debate the burden of proof rests on papers on water purification those presenting challenge to the status quo, so the burden of proof rests on the advocates of homosexual marriage to prove its morality.” This, I am afraid is simply not true. The burden of proof is not on essay writing anyone challenging the status quo. American Revolution Essay? Such beliefs helped to keep slavery and racial segregation alive for years. To quote from Wikipedia: “Under the Latin maxim necessitas probandi incumbit ei qui agit, the original writing, ordinary rule is that “the necessity of essay guestbook, proof lies with he who complains.” For example, a person has to prove that someone is guilty (in a criminal case) or liable (in a civil case) depending on writing the allegations; a person is not required to prove his or her own innocence, it is rebuttably presumed.” In the case of homosexuality, the burden is on ‘they who complain’, i.e., the of the american revolution, people who object to it.

Just as we should assume arrested men are innocent until shown guilty. We should also assume homosexuality is morally ‘innocent’ until shown otherwise. The problem with your position is original, that you start with a prejudice (that homosexuality is wrong), and then challenge people to convince you otherwise. This is back to front. Can you see the evolution test essay, problem if I stated that I think all black people are immoral and then challenged people to prove me wrong (just to be clear, I don’t actually think that)? To conclude, allowing same-sex couples to marry will not bring about the destruction of marriage, families and society in essay, general. All homosexuals are asking for is the right to be united with their loved ones, and to have that union recognised for what it is: in every aspect, just as moral, loving, legitimate and worthy of respect as those undertaken by writing thesis discussion chapter heterosexuals. By what right do we deny them this? By Richard Hollis. Dustin Steeve is a blogger and web enthusiast.

Dustin's passion is to original writing, see his generation of Christians rise up as thought leaders, doing remarkable, good work Christianly. Dustin is interested in research on water purification, the rise of web media and increasingly prominent use of computer technology as a tool to original essay writing, aid people. Dustin worked for hva er et essay three years as the director of original essay writing, GodblogCon and is an adviser for guestbook 2.3 the Christian Web Conference. Writing? Dustin graduated summa cum laude and ap bio evolution, received his B.A. in History from Biola University where he also graduated from Torrey Honors Institute. Dustin has completed some post-graduate work at the Stanford Graduate School of writing, Business where he was appointed to the Dean's List and received a certificate of completion from the Summer Institute for General Management. View all posts by Dustin R. Steeve.

You state that “at the core of homosexual marriage is homosexuality…[and] whether homosexuality is advanced guestbook, moral” If this is really the essay writing, core issue, then why all the subterfuge over marriage? Why not criminalize homosexuality? For if you cannot justify criminalizing homosexuality, its seems to me that you cannot make a good argument against banning gay marriage. If you respond that you do want to criminalize homosexuality too (I mean literally fine, jail, or deport gay people), then it seems somewhat deceitful that you haven’t explicitly made that policy argument. Essay Advanced Guestbook 2.3? It prompts questions about a “secret agenda” or “slippery slope”….will you next criminalize divorce next, taking the original essay, Lord’s name in vane, dancing, or alcohol? We are all sinners. After the honor margaret river, “pure Christians” finish with the gays, will they come for original writing me next? Recent studies show that 95.6% of gay men report infidelity in their current relationship. Numerous studies reveal that, among self-described committed homosexual couples, each individual has had an average of 3-5 partners a year.

If you are morally opposed to the idea of gay people being promiscuous, why do you not support proposals to give them a legal incentive toward monogamy? “. . . the opposite of homosexuality is not heterosexuality, its holiness.” So what’s the opposite essay in laurence river, of heterosexuality? And again, if “the core of homosexual marriage is homosexuality,” what is at “the core” of essay, heterosexual marriage? If you are morally opposed to the idea of gay people being promiscuous, why do you not support proposals to give them a legal incentive toward monogamy? Are saying gays need to thesis chapter, be bribed to be monogamous? Loving each other and essay writing, being in a committed relationship isn’t enough? You’ve got to get goodies from the state? Sounds like gays have a lot of problems to work out before they start demanding marriage.

First, I think that fully legal and supported Civil Unions should be the hva er et essay, level of acceptance supported by the legal system — I read (and lightly believe) that there are some 27 different legal rights of a spouse from original essay, marriage that, in theory, could be gained by daughters of the revolution specific contractual agreements. I’d actually like to original essay, see a full booklet summarizing all of them, but haven’t (perhaps you know?). Marriage is for children. In a very real, genetic based way, every child is a marriage of half of research papers purification, each parent’s DNA — the original essay writing, mother’s ovum DNA is married to the father’s sperm DNA. (a bond no one can sunder.) How many gov’t benefits / lower taxes or credits, etc., should be granted to parents is discussion, one of the particular issues somewhat outside of ‘gay marriage’. I think the non-gov’t benefits of marriage are so great that no additional benefits are needed, until very expensive children are born — and it is in the raising of original, children that gov’t cash benefits should be focused. All homosexuals are asking for hva er et essay is the original writing, right to be united with their loved ones, and to ap bio evolution, have that union recognised for what it is: in every aspect, just as moral, loving, legitimate and original essay, worthy of hva er et essay, respect as those undertaken by heterosexuals. By what right do we deny them this? Because promiscuity is immoral, and there’s a much higher probability of promiscuity among gays than among married straights, I don’t consider them ‘equal’. Drunk driving is essay, a better comparison than inter-racial marriage.

Most drunk drivers most of the time get home as safely as sober drivers — and many sober folk have accidents. Yet drunk driving is illegal because of the probability of more accidents. I don’t consider any unmarried lovers as ‘respect worthy’ as married lovers, because of the commitment to fidelity promise; gays asking for marriage are not even uniform in agreement on whether fidelity should be part of their marriage agreement. Marriage has already been weakened, and devalued (a la Britney, Liz Taylor, etc.); and even love itself has been primarily portrayed in culture as lust, rather than commitment. Gay marriage rather than civil unions weakens it further. Finally, homosexual behavior is sinful in hva er et essay, Christian theology. Part of the gay marriage push to ‘equal morality’ is to make it illegal to claim that gay sex is sinful. (See Europe) I’m a sinner, too. Essay Writing? But even so, I object to steps towards restricting Christians from essay, calling gay sex sinful — and writing, thus immoral. Straight promiscuity is also immoral; and neither should be respected as equal to married faithfulness.

Marriage is a fundamental building block of society. That phrase is often used but seldom explained. When I say “fundamental building block of society” I am referring to marriage’s natural creation of families. Agreed but I think you would then also agree that it is all the more important not to exclude members of essay, society from marriage unless there is a very good reason. In addition, you miss the writing, trees from the forest.

A family is not just a baby or child but many people. Marriage, when it works well, provides for stability for all family members. This is good for a baby but it is essay in laurence river, also good for everyone else, such as the elderly or even the single person who is alone. According to A. Dean Byrd, Ph.D, “There is essay writing, no fact that has been established by social science literature more convincingly than the following: all variables considered, children are best served when reared in hva er et essay, a home with a married mother and father.” OK but what does this have to do with gay marriage? By definition the only way for original essay a gay couple to discussion, be raising a kid is original, if this above ideal has broken down somehow. According to ex-gay speaker Mike Haley, the odds of a straight man contracting AIDS after one heterosexual encounter are 1 in 165,000 as opposed to of the revolution essay, 1 in 175 for gay men after one homosexual encounter. That’s a good point in favor for original essay writing gay marriage, as for discussion chapter the other statistics:

I have given reasons why I believe equating homosexual unions with marriage is writing, unhealthy. Upon these grounds, I believe a rational decision can be made. Not really, you’ve written off a class of hva er et essay, human beigns based on a sociological study. Give me an essay, Excel sheet with enough data and ap bio evolution, I’ll find you plenty of niches among heterosexuals that replicate the original writing, ‘problems’ you’ve shown. For example, if I demonstrated that marriages of 35+ yr old women to men between 19-24 have incidents of cheating and STDs equal or greater than the daughters of the american, ones you cited for gays would you prohibit the writing, recognition of hva er et essay, such marriages? How many other members of your cohort would it take to screw up marriage so much that you’d give up your wife?

People who cite studies are of more dubious moral character than any homosexual my friend, don’t be a sociologist! Tread very carefully! The decision to allow homosexuals to original essay, marry is crossing essay river, a moral matter because at the core of homosexual marriage is homosexuality. Essay Writing? Your answer to essay advanced 2.3, the question of whether homosexuality is moral is going to determine your view of whether homosexual marriage should be accepted. Essay Writing? My moral framework is heavily informed by my evangelical Christian faith. 1. Not all people are Christians and not even all Christians agree with you on gay marriage. 2. Thesis Discussion? The purpose of the state is not to enshrine Christian morality and it isn’t to ‘teach’ morality. This is why many marriages are perfectly legal even though they would ideally be given at original essay writing least a little skeptical scrutiny by ap bio evolution test essay a pastor….more about that below… Recently, marriage has suffered the consequences of unhealthy ideas written into law such as no-fault divorce. Now we can put a stop to essay, that trend. Why don’t you show us how keeping the gay couple down the hva er et essay, street from being able to have a legal marriage stops you from essay writing, being a good father to your children or a good husband to your wife…or at least would facilitate you becoming a better one?

If you can’t do that then why not ‘put a stop to that trend’ by, say, actually putting a stop to the trend and put your eggs in rewriting divorce laws. A cynic might say here you are rallying the troops behind feeling good by attacking a minority group you people do not like, do not associate with and would like to scapegoat for your own miserable failings. As a matter of fact, why not go only as far as the Catholic Church and refuse to writing thesis, recognize divorced people who have remarried except under circumstances where an application for essay writing annullment has been vetted and granted? Why not castigate the failure of your VP candidate to properly raise her daughter and stop celebrating the impending marriage that…study wise….is likely to be yet another failed marriage? Timber in hva er et essay, thine own eye indeed. Are saying gays need to writing, be bribed to essay advanced guestbook, be monogamous? Loving each other and being in a committed relationship isn’t enough? Please stop trying to outstupid smmtheory, on the previous SSM thread he takes the campionship. On the essay, off chance you’re serious I wouldn’t say marriage is a ‘bribe’ to be monogamous but more of daughters revolution essay, a challenge that has both positive and negative reinforcement. Even with no-fault divorce and original writing, adultry no longer being a major cause for ‘punishment’ in divorce hearings you’re playing with fire if you get married without an research papers on water, intention to essay writing, at least try to be monogamous. Your partner can screw you over (pardon the pun) in lots of ways both legal and emotional. Writing Thesis Chapter? (For an interesting take on how marriage has a dark side that can, in some ways, be good see the response this advice columnist gave here:http://www.salon.com/mwt/col/tenn/2008/08/22/laughter_in_the_dark/ really read it, it was one of the most interesting takes I’ve ever read although it’s not directly tied to gay marriage at all)

Loving each other and being in a committed relationship isn’t enough? NOTE: All the moms and writing, dads with teen kids thinking of moving in hva er et essay, with their girlfriends or boyfriends might want to take note of original essay writing, this phrase from ucfengr. Take the internet filter off the p orn #038; block out research purification, ucfengr’s writing least you want some of his words thrown at you! Please stop trying to outstupid smmtheory, on the previous SSM thread he takes the campionship. Perhaps you should get over yourself, Boonton. You’re really not smart enough to call other people stupid so freely. On the off chance you’re serious I wouldn’t say marriage is a ‘bribe. That’s great, but you weren’t the essay, one I was responding to. I was responding to this: why do you not support proposals to hva er et essay, give them a legal incentive toward monogamy? Most people don’t need a “legal incentive” to writing, stay monogamous, even before they are married. Discussion Chapter? For most the writing, knowledge that infidelity would severely damage or destroy a relationship is enough, but apparently that is not enough for essay advanced guestbook gays, who need a government bribe.

Richard Hollis wrote: Again, I only wish I had the original, links available to me to read up on these studies, but as it is I simply do not believe they are accurate or reliable. I’m not sure I understand this objection, since there were ample links to essay honor in laurence margaret, the statistic sources and essay, the studies to thesis discussion chapter, which Dustin referred. Perhaps you object to original essay writing, the fact that some of hva er et essay, these sources are not downloadable for free? Or is original writing, it that they are hosted on sites like Family Research Council (www.frc.org) to which you do not wish to contribute?

Or (as I believe is ap bio evolution essay, more likely) do you simply choose to disbelieve those studies that do not fit your world view? Don’t misunderstand me: I frankly think Prop 8 is the original writing, wrong solution to the “problem”, if “gay marriage” is a problem. I would rather that government, at all levels, have nothing to say at all about marriage. That which government controls will likely be controlled in a manner I do not approve. Marriage is a great example of this principle. I believe it to be a sacred covenant, which should be sanctioned by the church and society, and entered (or dissolved) by the free choice of individuals. As such, the daughters of the revolution essay, coercive power of government at any level is not only original writing, unnecessary, it distorts the societal benefit and religious meaning of the relationship. Government’s role, if it has any at all, should be limited to enforcing the terms of the contract. Would such a laissez-faire approach allow same-sex couples to research papers, get “married”?

Of course. Would such couples get the benefits accorded to “traditional” marriages? No more or less than they do now; such benefits are under the control of the institution doing the providing, whether a charity, employer, or government. As an example, anti-Prop 8 groups cite the problem that a same-sex partner would not inherit pensions. Original? The truth is, pensions are not inheritable, unless it is advanced guestbook, stipulated in the contract(s) that create the writing, pension . And, in fact, many — not all, but many — pension plans are inheritable by anyone the pension recipien;t wishes, whether spouse, partner, progeny, or next-door neighbor. That some, and crossing essay honor in laurence margaret, maybe most pensions are not so designable is not a problem with the law, it is a problem with the contract signed to create the pension. The heritability of some government benefits is a whole ‘nother subject, but this, too, could be solved simply by removing the concept of “marriage” from the law altogether.

All of this said, I will probably vote in favor of Proposition 8. If we can’t get government out of the original essay writing, marriage business altogether, we can at least get them to define it in a manner that most Californians can stomach. Perhaps you should get over yourself, Boonton. Crossing Essay Honor? You’re really not smart enough to call other people stupid so freely. I’ve only called 3 people here stupid. Try to think of it in a positive way….you’re like a member of an elite force here….

Most people don’t need a “legal incentive” to stay monogamous, even before they are married. … Like I said I think it is missing something to original, describe marriage as an ‘incentive for monogamoy’. It is more accurate to describe it as a challenge (in lots of things, not just monogamy). A challenge has positives but it also has difficulties. For most the knowledge that infidelity would severely damage or destroy a relationship is enough, but apparently that is not enough for gays, who need a government bribe. You don’t get a gov’t bribe for writing chapter being monogamous in a marriage. Did I miss something, is California giving out coupons for original essay free ice cream for married gay couples who don’t cheat? And I notice you dodged my other point, if the only point here is the fuzzy happy thought of advanced 2.3, a relationship why have marriage at all? Why don’t people just live with each other as they please and original essay, if that turns out to hva er et essay, be a life long relationship great if not ahhh well? Your view of marriage seems to not only make it unneeded for original writing gays but for everyone.

Channelling a bit of Hugh Hefner today are we? I agree wholeheartedly with you that getting government altogether out of the issue is the discussion chapter, preferable course (as I argued in the thread on the former post on the subject). Christians err when they want representative government to make it safe to believe in Christianity. The only danger that concerns me as an American is the loss of freedom of speech under hate crime regimens. JustMakingItUp: Hi, I’m Richard Hollis. Actually I meant that I literally couldn’t follow the links, as I had only received a draft version of Dustin’s original essay by e-mail, and the links were not attached. To be fair, I do take your point that it was the weakest part of my response because I was speaking from an emotional point rather than a logical one. My hunch was to reject these statistics out of hand because they seemed so over-inflated, and this of course, would not have been a reasonable thing to do if I could have followed the links.

However, I still think my hunch was justified. Statistics like this (when people are presumably interviewed and asked to simply tell the truth) are generally notoriously difficult for a number of reasons. For one thing, people lie. It may be that the researcher has discovered a tendancy in gay men to exaggerate their sexual conquests. It may be that the original, research involved heterosexual people who were still in relationships (and therefore more likely to essay margaret river, lie about their infidelities). Writing? It may even be that the researchers were not impartial, and actively wanted to ap bio test essay, find that gay men were promiscuous, and so deliberately asked heterosexual people who seemed straight-laced and essay writing, monogamous, and thesis discussion, homosexual people who seemed rather… well… sluttish (for want of a better word). A lot of work needs to go into making sure legitimate scientific studies are impartial, objective, and wherever possible, double-blinded. And that is before you even study the implications of the findings.

But yes, now I can access the links, I intend to essay writing, read up on these studies (I still have not done so yet). It should make interesting reading. In theory I’m not against your libertarian take on marriage but I’m not sure it is as practical as you depict to simply replace all of it with a bunch of contracts. For example, some states still have spousal privilege when it comes to criminal trials, I don’t see how you can replicate that in a private contract. Even if you’re willing to dispense with privilege, there are other legal implications to getting married that are bit complicated. Thesis Discussion? For example, you are legally obligated for the debts your spouse incurs for writing necessities like medical care. This obviously has a public policy benefit….Donald Trump’s wife can’t ask for thesis discussion chapter charity care on the grounds that she has no job and original essay, her husband doesn’t want to foot the bill but I don’t think you could manufacture it by having your spouse carry around a private contract. JustMakingItUp – Hi, I’m Richard Hollis. Actually, the reason I was not able to access the link is that I had only received a draft of advanced 2.3, Dustin’s post via e-mail and the links were not attached. I do take your point that it was the writing, weakest part of my response. Ap Bio Evolution Essay? I was taking an emotional stance rather than a logic one.

I was dismissing the studies out of hand simply because they seemed too over-inflated, and original writing, this would have been totally unreasonable of me had I been able to access the links. However, I don’t think I was totally unjustified. Studies such as these (where people are presumably asked to fill out surveys and writing discussion, trusted to tell the truth) are notoriously fraught with difficulties. For one thing, people lie. It may be that the researchers actually found a tendancy in homosexuals to exaggerate their sexual conquests. Essay Writing? Perhaps the research on water, heterosexuals interviewed were in relationships, and therefore less likely to admit to any infidelities. Writing? Perhaps the researchers themselves were biased, and actively wanted to daughters of the essay, prove homosexuals were more promiscuous, and so deliberately selected people they expected to give the results they wanted to essay writing, hear. It is essay, extremely important (and difficult) to make sure such studies are truly objective, impartial, double-blinded (where possible), and even accurate. And that is writing, before we even discuss the implications of the findings.

But now I have the links, I intend to papers purification, follow them (I still have not done so yet). I’m sure they will make interesting reading. JustMakingItUp – Hi, I’m Richard Hollis. Actually, the reason I was not able to access the link is essay writing, that I had only received a draft of Dustin’s post via e-mail and essay advanced guestbook 2.3, the links were not attached. I do take your point that it was the original, weakest part of writing thesis, my response. Original? I was taking an emotional stance rather than a logic one.

I was dismissing the studies out of essay advanced guestbook 2.3, hand simply because they seemed too over-inflated, and this would have been totally unreasonable of writing, me had I been able to access the links. However, I don’t think I was totally unjustified. Studies such as these (where people are presumably asked to fill out surveys and ap bio evolution, trusted to tell the truth) are notoriously fraught with difficulties. For one thing, people lie. It may be that the researchers actually found a tendancy in homosexuals to exaggerate their sexual conquests. Perhaps the heterosexuals interviewed were in essay, relationships, and therefore less likely to admit to daughters revolution essay, any infidelities. Perhaps the researchers themselves were biased, and actively wanted to prove homosexuals were more promiscuous, and so deliberately selected people they expected to give the essay writing, results they wanted to hear.

It is extremely important (and difficult) to make sure such studies are truly objective, impartial, double-blinded (where possible), and even accurate. Daughters Of The American? And that is before we even discuss the original writing, implications of the findings. But now I have the links, I intend to follow them (I still have not done so yet). I’m sure they will make interesting reading. Ooops. Sorry about that… I do take your point that it was the weakest part of my response.

I was taking an emotional stance rather than a logic one. I was dismissing the studies out of hand simply because they seemed too over-inflated, and research papers on water, this would have been totally unreasonable of original essay, me had I been able to access the links. The studies probably are overinflated, outdated and distorted in some or many respects but the larger issue is ‘so what’. Statistics are always in flux and it is on water, always possible to create the numbers that suit your agenda, and by create I don’t mean lie but simply choose your subjects carefully to get the results you want. How about the divorce rate for A-level celebrities who marry within two years of original, their first cover on People magazine? Domestic abuse rates for couples that meet at hva er et essay AA or NA meetings perhaps? If I told you bloggers have a 97% failure rate at marriage how would you feel about the state telling you it’s not going to let you get married for the sake of the ‘institution’? Great post!!

I invite everyone to original, read the post on http://editorialsection.com. I haven’t visited Evangelical Outpost for quite a while. American Essay? Now that I return it feels like Charlton Heston returning to earth in Planet of the Apes. Is this some kind of Emergent Evangelicalism? From these comments, and those on other threads, it appears that many evangelicals support a redefinition of marriage and the family – beginning with gender, moving on I presume to number. A large number seem poised to support a candidate most distinguished for his promise to original, sweep away even the smallest impediments to the killing of unborn children as one of his first acts in office. Freedom of the Gospel, indeed.

This kind of freedom appears set to bind our nation for writing discussion chapter a very long time. (Note: BitterClinger is merely a screenname, not intended to imply any relationship to Jamie Farr, his family or associates.) I think both authors have thoughtfully expressed their opinions, and original, I applaud their efforts. Research On Water? This is the original essay, kind of reasoned discourse that, while it might not lead to consensus, keeps open the doors of communication. Thank you, Mr.

Steeve and Mr. Hollis for your contributions. You have given me much to ponder. I’ve only called 3 people here stupid. Try to think of it in a positive way….you’re like a member of an elite force here…. As I said, you are not smart enough to call anybody stupid. Writing Thesis? Perhaps you should stop trying to justify it. Like I said I think it is missing something to original essay, describe marriage as an ‘incentive for monogamoy’. Then talk to Ebonmuse, he was the one that asserted it was needed. On Water? Though, he is far from the only “gay marriage” advocate to use that argument. What is sad is original essay, that people use Christianity when it is convenient for hva er et essay them.

The verses most Christians use against original writing, homosexuality, if looked at closer, condemn those that would use them. On Water? If you do follow the Bible, Homosexuality is a sin. Original Writing? Guess what so is Adultery! We don’t have a problem with our kids seeing a man and woman sin on TV but two men or two women and God’s gonna burn your TV! You can’t convince someone to desire to be Holy unless you can demonstrate what Holy is. It’s Planks and Splinters. No I don’t agree with homosexuality but I’m tired of people living with their girlfriend out of wedlock and hva er et essay, Telling a Gay couple they will burn in original writing, Hell. Then talk to Ebonmuse, he was the one that asserted it was needed. Though, he is far from the revolution, only “gay marriage” advocate to writing, use that argument. If you want to essay, conduct private debates then take it to email, otherwise any argument posted on a comment board is fair game for criticism by anyone who reads it. From these comments, and original writing, those on other threads, it appears that many evangelicals support a redefinition of marriage and the family – beginning with gender, moving on evolution I presume to number.

Nah, the comments you see that support the redefinition of marriage and family are the atheists, Cafeteria Christians, and others that nay-say evangelicals and purport to original writing, tell everybody they aren’t tolerant enough (never mind the ap bio evolution essay, fact that Christ didn’t tolerate sin). The comments made by others tend to get lost in the shuffle or drown out by the comments from the self-appointed arbiters of intelligence, tolerance, and enlightenment. If you want to conduct private debates then take it to email, otherwise any argument posted on writing a comment board is fair game for criticism by anyone who reads it. What’s amazing about this whole discourse, is that Boonton calls me stupid. Here’s the writing chapter, path: Ebonmuse asserts that gays need the incentive of marriage to practice monogamy. I point out how silly that is and if it’s true (which it could be, he is writing, not the only gay marriage supporter to ap bio essay, put forward that argument), gays obviously have bigger problems than not being able to be married. Boonton calls me stupid for saying gays need an incentive to be monogamous, while at the same time showing that he doesn’t understand what an original, incentive is (here’s a clue, marriage is the incentive). Now that I look at it, I find myself starting to evolution test essay, agree with Boonton; I am stupid.

Who but an original essay writing, idiot would get stuck in writing, orbit around the essay, black hole of test essay, stupidity that is Boonton? It doesn’t look as if the original essay writing, original author of this post intends to address my point. Research Papers Purification? Unfortunate. ucfengr, you have twisted my words. I did not say that gays “need the writing, incentive of marriage to practice monogamy”. That is obviously false: the large numbers of american revolution, gay couples who are already living in monogamous relationships, fighting for the right to have those relationships legally recognized, is disproof enough of that. Original Writing? But if you think monogamy is a good thing, as I assume you do, then why would you be opposed to giving people additional incentives to daughters essay, practice it? If you’re opposed to original essay writing, “bribing” people to be monogamous, do you also think we should roll back the tax exemptions and other benefits offered to heterosexual married couples? The selective application of ap bio evolution test, logic when it comes to anti-gay-marriage arguments never ceases to astonish. Are some gays promiscuous? No doubt.

And something like 50% of heterosexual marriages end in original writing, divorce. Papers? Does that also prove that straight people are inherently promiscuous and original writing, don’t deserve access to marriage either? do you also think we should roll back the tax exemptions and other benefits offered to heterosexual married couples? Most of those tax incentives or exemptions occur for dependent children. Writing Thesis Discussion Chapter? If the original essay, couple both work and earn extra money, their taxes can often be higher when their combined income pushes them into the higher tax bracket. Given how advocates brag about how homosexuals tend to earn more, that seems more likely to happen than not. One other thing to note is daughters american revolution essay, that depending on how much a parent spends on essay their child, that tax exemption does not really make a child any more affordable and only slightly mitigates the essay, expenses of raising children. So loosing the tax exemptions and other supposed benefits given to essay, heterosexual married couples would be worth it to me at least if it were to be traded for the elimination of monosexed marriage being recognized as valid by the government. Do you think that the advocates for monosexed marriage would quit seeking governmental recognition of their relationship as a valid marriage if the thesis discussion chapter, tax exemptions and essay writing, other benefits were non-existent for heterosexual marriages?

I for one, do not think they would quit. I think bringing those things up is used as an evasion from having to talk about the true and underlying motives behind the activism. I’m pretty educated in religion and theology (masters degrees in writing thesis discussion, both). i lean pretty heavily on the conservative side when it comes to issues of homosexuality, bottom line, i disagree with it and don’t think it’s right or moral. With that said i would still not vote for proposition 8. I think the homosexual community should have the right to marriage and things that go with marriage. I also don’t agree with the original essay, Muslim faith and many other faiths and practices but i still think Islamic people should have the right to get married.

I think it’s a smoke screen to hva er et essay, think that the liberal illuminati are going to take over original, the country and gays are going to be the down fall of marriage. I simply don’t believe that to crossing in laurence, be true. Original? People, specifically people who claim to follow Jesus need to get serious about marriage before they start wanting to defend it in court. McCain being a huge example. This is America we believe in freedom of religion and equal right, i affirm those things and it’s it’s because of that that i think homosexuals should be able to crossing essay honor margaret, marry. I really don’t see how someone well versed in religion and theology can counter Jesus’ definition of marriage – one man and one woman.

To do so implies that you find suspect at least one of original writing, his teachings. The question then becomes – How many more after that do you find suspect such that you can no longer say you whole-heartedly believe what Jesus taught? Boonton calls me stupid for saying gays need an advanced guestbook 2.3, incentive to be monogamous, while at the same time showing that he doesn’t understand what an incentive is (here’s a clue, marriage is the incentive). It’s stupid to describe marriage as a bribe by writing the gov’t to be monogamous. Marriage does indeed have incentives to be monogamous but it’s a lot more complicated than that.

It is daughters american revolution essay, a challenge to reap the original, rewards of mutual monogamy….the description of a marriage as a contract is very apt. In a contract, both parties agree to give something up in exchange for something else. It is papers on water purification, assumed they enter a contract because they deem this to be a fair trade. Original Writing? Yes it is possible for one side to cheat (example, you accept the inventory but refuse to pay the papers on water purification, vendor) so contract law has incentives for both sides not to cheat. The point of that, though, is not for the gov’t to bribe people into honoring their contracts. Smmtheory – hello again. I just had to post to original writing, correct you, but Jesus did not say anything about homosexuality at thesis discussion all. Nothing. Not one thing. Which is odd in itself; if homosexuality is such a great sin, you’d think he’d at essay least MENTION it once…

To the people who say ‘No’ on prop 8. How about changing the evolution essay, definition of marriage as partnering with any preference such as man-to-dog? woman-to-pig. Do you like it? How about redefining of original writing, “dependent” in tax law by changing it and adoption of a dog can be allowed for tax exemption for dependent? Can you accept it?

Let’s keep the common sense. Request for Same sex marriage has gone much higher beyond tolerance level of our society. Therfore, ‘YES’ on of the american essay Prop 8 is absolutely necessary for our social health. Jeong, that is a ridiculous comparrison. A marriage is a union of two consenting equals.

You cannot marrying a dog because a dog has no idea what it is doing. It does not understand marriage, let alone consent to it. Therefore it is not a fair comparrison. Two men or two women can love each other as deeply and sincerely as a man and essay writing, a woman. Requesting same-sex marriage does not go beyond tolerance at all. How about changing the definition of marriage as partnering with any preference such as man-to-dog? woman-to-pig. Do you like it?

Not really, I see no argument in favor of man-dog or woman-pig marriages. I see a very good one against essay advanced, it which is original essay writing, that dogs and pigs are not humans. Last time I checked, gays are. How about redefining of “dependent” in tax law by changing it and adoption of a dog can be allowed for tax exemption for dependent? Can you accept it? Well anyone can be a dependent in tax law….if you are taking care of someone, I think the test is provide at least half their expenses and that is more than $5K a year…..as for expanding that to dogs, I’d love that as I have two dogs….but I suppose it would be wiser to use a tax exemption to help someone keep their home or cloth their kids. Once it is allowed to redefine marriage as you prefer for Homosexuality, anybody might be able to redefine it according to their preference without restriciton. In that case, this society will be in mess to define what is right or wrong and what can be tolerant or banned. Without certain restriction of human freedom according to common social welfare, evetually this society will be uncontrolable and papers, return to very primitive society.

If you think that man-to-man marriage is acceptable while man-to-dog is not acceptable just because dog is original essay, not humanbeing, it is completely ccontradictory logic because the man who prefer dog instead of humang being will be discriminated aaccording to your strange logic of ‘NO’ side of prop 8. If you think there is no problem to choose your partner for test marriage with same sex, why does it become problem for a person to choose a dog as marriage partner. Original Essay? You have to keep in mind that there can be some weird people who prefer animals to humanbeing naturally, as you insist that homosexuality is thesis chapter, innate. Let’s have common sense and logic… The same sex marriage should not be tolerated in the health society. ‘YES’ on Prop 8…it should be for original essay writing you and me and guestbook 2.3, my children and original, future generation and all human being. I just had to post to correct you, but Jesus did not say anything about homosexuality at all. Nothing.

Not one thing. Which is odd in ap bio test essay, itself; if homosexuality is such a great sin, you’d think he’d at least MENTION it once… Well, let’s put it this way, homosexual sex is essay, sex outside of writing chapter, marriage, which Jesus did have something to say about. And since his definition of marriage was between one man and one woman, I think that kind of original essay, means that when Jesus thinks sex outside of daughters of the revolution, marriage is sinful, that includes homosexual type. Original? And for those who thought that was unfair, Jesus recommended celibacy. Homosexual activity doesn’t exactly qualify as celibacy either. So there you have it, Jesus’ teaching on sex – either to your opposite sex spouse, or not at all. Writing Discussion? Why should teaching against homosexual sex outside of that be necessary when that covers it all? Actually, Jesus never said anything about original sex, period, except to condemn lust and writing thesis discussion chapter, adultery. He never condemned premarital sex. He did say, according to one gospel, that divorce is never permissible.

This is why the Catholic church doesn’t allow divorce. Essay Writing? Another gospel has him saying that divorce is permissible if one’s partner has committed adultery. He seems to clearly condemn remarriage after divorce. Various churches and scholars have differed sharply on of the american what Jesus really meant about divorce and whether one can ever divorce or ever remarry after a divorce. If Christians are serious about having the law reflect Jesus’ teachings on marriage, they should push for a constitutional amendment banning divorce, except for original writing scriptural causes. Of The Essay? A special religious court could be set up to original, determine whether a divorce or remarriage is essay honor margaret, allowed under biblical guidelines. Also, the US should never elect someone who has committed adultery, divorced his wife without just cause and remarried. Like John McCain.

Once it is allowed to redefine marriage as you prefer for Homosexuality, anybody might be able to redefine it according to essay, their preference without restriciton. I don’t recall anyone saying anything about essay margaret river preference, IMO it is about being fair and decent. Original Essay Writing? I’m sorry, no one has presented a convincing argument for margaret human-dog marriages but feel free to essay, try. If you think that man-to-man marriage is acceptable while man-to-dog is not acceptable just because dog is daughters essay, not humanbeing, it is completely ccontradictory logic because the man who prefer dog instead of humang being will be discriminated aaccording to your strange logic of essay, ‘NO’ side of prop 8. True a man who wants to of the american essay, marry a dog doesn’t get his way. Writing? So what? A dog still isn’t a human and on water, last time I checked is not able to enter contracts, not able to make informed consent, in general doesn’t have the original writing, intelligence that a human does….even very stupid humans. You have to keep in mind that there can be some weird people who prefer animals to humanbeing naturally, as you insist that homosexuality is innate. But animals can’t prefer humans, at least not in evolution, the sense that you need them to prefer to make a marriage (and I do hope you acknowledge marriage isn’t just about having sex).

There are humans in this category as well. For example, you can’t marry someone whose in writing, a coma. If Christians are serious about having the daughters, law reflect Jesus’ teachings on marriage, they should push for a constitutional amendment banning divorce, except for writing scriptural causes. The way it was before No-Fault divorce laws were written in other words. Christians were steamrolled on that one too. One of the arguments against No-Fault divorce laws was that we would end up where we are today with a 50% divorce rate. A lot of hva er et essay, good it did them to try to talk common sense into the activists and meddlers back then. And would you and the other proponents of monosexed “marriage” be sanguine about throwing out No-Fault divorce laws?

HECK NO! You would fight it as nastily as you fight marriage definition amendments. Don’t even pretend otherwise. I advocate getting rid of the No-Fault laws, but that’s not where the current fight is taking place. Suggesting that that is where we should take the fight is kind of like a bait-and-switch tactic, or pointing off to space somewhere behind your opponents back and original writing, saying “What’s that?” knowing full well that you will be trying to dodge around your opponent if he gets distracted by your ruse. A special religious court could be set up to determine whether a divorce or remarriage is allowed under biblical guidelines. The annulment process in the Catholic Church.

He never condemned premarital sex. Here’s the thing about pre-marital sex. It leads to adultery in one way or another. First, if a man has sex with a woman prior to marrying her, the daughters of the revolution, religious view is writing, that they should formalize the marriage they consumated. If they don’t, and then later that man gets married to honor in laurence margaret river, a different woman, he has retroactively committed adultery. Original Essay Writing? Now some people might consider the second sexual relationship the adulterous one, some might consider the first relationship the adulterous one in 2.3, a kind of essay writing, front-loaded sort of way. Either way, the adultery has been committed. And not just for that man, but having not married the woman he had intercourse with in the first place, they are both causing each other to american, commit adultery which is compounding the sin. Also, the US should never elect someone who has committed adultery, divorced his wife without just cause and remarried.

Like John McCain. We are electing a President of the original, country, not electing somebody to be a saint. Isn’t it a little bit hypocritical to be saying his adultery should disqualify him when you have said Bill Clinton’s adultery wasn’t such a big deal? It is surely true that there will be nobody who want to hva er et essay, marry with dog. However my point is original essay writing, that, if all the evolution test essay, effort for redefinition for original same sex marriage is essay 2.3, allowed, then marriage can be redefined according to any preference. And also we can allow redefining of all other social terms. What if redefining adult? Let’s say for original essay example, somebody want to hva er et essay, marry with 7 years old kid, it is prohibited at present time. Writing? However, with the purification, similar logic of requesting for same sex marriage, somebody can complain and original writing, appeal for the permit of the kind marriage with kid.

If law enforce that kid does not have dicernment of right or wrong about the marriage, it is discriminating the kid, according to your logic. Acutally, there have been some other countries where marriage with 7 years old has been allowed. Of course, I cannot tolerate for kid to marry with adult. Likewise I cannot tolerate for the marriage between same sex. Mature society should be able to set rules and restrict some freedom for common welfare. Clearly you put a lot of effort into thinking through and depicting your position in favor of Proposition 8. However, your argument suffers from enough deficiencies that it fails to daughters of the american, support your conclusion. Marriage is a fundamental building block of society. That phrase is original, often used but seldom explained. Hva Er Et Essay? When I say “fundamental building block of society” I am referring to marriage’s natural creation of families. You conflate two terms here, marriage and families, base your position on the latter, and then use indirection to original writing, corral the former. Families are the building block of society.

Civil marriage is a legal construct to original purpose was to protect the property rights of women and the children that were, until the Pill, the essay in laurence margaret river, eventually nearly inevitable outcome of original essay, sex. Clearly, protecting the property rights of dependents is chapter, important. However, in linking families and marriage as you do, you are appealing to the same notions of human nature that animate the left: our nature and actions are determined by society. I doubt very much you believe that; in fact, I’ll bet you believe precisely the essay writing, opposite. Discussion Chapter? However, without that underlying assumption, your conflation fails. And, along the way, it denigrates religious marriage, which sanctifies monogamy regardless of secular legal constructs. According to A. Dean Byrd, Ph.D, “There is essay, no fact that has been established by social science literature more convincingly than the following: all variables considered, children are best served when reared in a home with a married mother and father.” I think that is american, close enough to original essay, objective truth to take as stipulated. However, as a practical matter, it is presents . Within the realm of human affairs, there will always be some children who do not have such an evolution essay, environment available to them. Even more sadly, there are children for whom there are few options.

In order to essay, complete that statement, it needs to consider those children for whom the ap bio evolution essay, options are two: an series of foster parents, or adoption by original essay writing a same-sex couple. Appealing to the advisability of married mother and father for hva er et essay children is pointless if that option is not on offer. Which leaves the question that matters open and unaddressed: which is essay writing, least bad, being raised by a married same-sex couple, or foster care? As an aside, SFAIK, same sex couples may adopt children in most, if not all, of the 50 states. Whether that is a good idea or not is a subject for a separate thread that should always keep in thesis, mind the options on offer. … the same-sex culture still has elements of great concern which we ought to consider before we introduce these elements into marriage. Pain and suffering resulting from original, sexual disease permeate homosexual communities. According to ex-gay speaker Mike Haley, the odds of a straight man contracting AIDS after one heterosexual encounter are 1 in 165,000 as opposed to 1 in honor in laurence margaret, 175 for writing gay men after one homosexual encounter. I don’t have the time to prove it, but, notionally, that latter number cannot possibly be correct. Ap Bio Evolution? Presume gay men are something like as promiscuous as you believe them to be: 5 different partners per writing, month. If the odds of a gay man contracting AIDS are in fact 1 in 175 unique encounters, then essentially all gay men are dead.

Except they aren’t, so that stat needs some explaining. More fundamentally, though, let’s take all those statistics as stipulated. So far as I know, Evangelists agree that mankind is fallen. Your statistics, at best, show that gays are somewhat more fallen than the rest of us. Which demands the question: is there a fallenness threshold beyond which marriage is not allowed? If so, then you need to show it, and how gays fall on the far side. Hva Er Et Essay? Otherwise, these stats, even if true, do not advance your argument even an original essay writing, inch towards its goal. Your moral framework needs foremost to be informed by deciding up front whether morality applies to the situation at hand. In order for something to essay 2.3, assess the morality of essay writing, something, one must first know the extent to test, which that thing involves a choice. For instance, (although Christians once thought otherwise), there is absolutely no moral component to being left handed — there is no choice in the matter.

Similarly, no matter how much your evangelical Christian faith informs your moral framework, homosexuality is not a matter of choice. Original? There simply is no moral component to being gay. Now, you may counter that while there is no moral component to being gay, actualization of that fact is immoral. Unfortunately, not only does that leave you on the horns of the Euthryphro dilemma, it also presents you with a theodicy problem: why would God create a group of people and then demand that others ostracize, and essay advanced guestbook 2.3, even kill, them? One need not be a Christian in order to have a compelling moral argument against homosexuality.

For example, you might be Aristotelian. If so, you might consider the anatomical design of men and women and conclude that homosexual sex is against the proper function of humans. As it happens, all mammals start existence as females. It is only through the original, Y-linked expression of hormones during gestation that a female body plan becomes male. Essay Advanced Guestbook 2.3? What would an Aristotelian make of that? Particularly when informed the Jamie Lee Curtis is, by essay writing Aristotelian standards, male? Your argument in favor of Prop-8, the ap bio, result of which is to original essay, impose a sectarian notion upon a non-sectarian society, simply fails to make its case. The task facing you is to convince the hva er et essay, rest of us that allowing gays to essay writing, marry will somehow corrode marriages for guestbook 2.3 heterosexuals.

As others have noted (Boonton, perhaps), no amount of mayhem to to which groups of heterosexuals are particularly prone constitutes a barrier to marriage, yet requires such for gays. You attempt to make a moral case, but the very foundation of that argument disappears in the absence of choice. Finally, you make an appeal to anatomical design without acknowledging its basics or contingencies. Your position makes perfect sense for insisting evangelical Christians refuse the marriage sacrament to gays. However, it completely fails to make a case for similarly restricting civil marriage. The way it was before No-Fault divorce laws were written in other words. Christians were steamrolled on that one too. One of the arguments against No-Fault divorce laws was that we would end up where we are today with a 50% divorce rate. Whose this ‘we’ here?

Christians? If you’re not supposed to get a divorce except for scriptual reasons then don’t get a divorce except. Are we at essay the point here where you’re telling us gay marriage must be banned (and no-fault divorce abolished) because Christians need the gov’t to bribe them into following their religion? The annulment process in the Catholic Church. Last time I checked it was alive and well and essay margaret river, hasn’t fallen even though it is highly unpopular among other Christians, not supported by civil marriage law and is even unpopular among many Catholics. We are electing a President of the country, not electing somebody to be a saint. Isn’t it a little bit hypocritical to be saying his adultery should disqualify him when you have said Bill Clinton’s adultery wasn’t such a big deal? I guess we just expected something more from original essay writing, someone from the research on water, ‘pro-American’ portion of the country. It’s not the first time smmtheory has disappointed. It is surely true that there will be nobody who want to original essay, marry with dog.

However my point is that, if all the effort for redefinition for same sex marriage is research papers purification, allowed, then marriage can be redefined according to any preference. Your error is assuming the argument in favor of gay marriage is simply “well that’s what some gays prefer and we should always do what people prefer”. Essay Writing? That is not the stand supporters of gay marriage have taken for the simple reason that it is an impossible stand to take. People of guestbook 2.3, contradictory preferences, you would rather there be no gay people, some others would rather everyone be gay, others yet would rather be allowed to drive around with a nuclear bomb in their trunk. What if redefining adult? Let’s say for example, somebody want to marry with 7 years old kid, it is prohibited at present time. …. Of course, I cannot tolerate for kid to original essay writing, marry with adult. Likewise I cannot tolerate for the marriage between same sex. Mature society should be able to set rules and hva er et essay, restrict some freedom for original common welfare.

And you yourself introduce the problem with your argument as well as the solution to the question you pose. Instead of essay advanced, asking why societal terms should ever be redefined, ask the reverse question, when are restrictions on freedoms good for the common welfare. When you look at it from that angle a lot of these questions suddenly get a lot easier. Interracial marriage bans? A restriction on freedom that harms the common welfare therefore it was proper that they were abolished. Marriage of original essay, 7 yr olds? Big common welfare problem. How about writing thesis chapter marriage of 17 yr olds? Well that’s a bit iffier so states of differing rules. Since your argument doesn’t connect the dots, doesn’t demonstrate how gay marriage would harm the common welfare, I don’t think it makes it.

I don’t have the time to prove it, but, notionally, that latter number cannot possibly be correct. Essay? Presume gay men are something like as promiscuous as you believe them to be: 5 different partners per ap bio evolution essay, month. 1. This is kind of original essay writing, technical but why should one assume a bell curve distribution of gay promiscuity rather than say a power law distribution? The bell curve fits certain sets of data like height. Most people are a few inches around the ‘average height’ with fewer and fewer people more distant from that average. A power law follows a distribution like income. If you calculate the average income by exluding the richest 0.05% you’ll get a radically lower number than if you include them. Removing a few thousand of America’s tallest people will not dramatically alter the average height of all Americans. 2. Given this possibility, even if 5 in ap bio test essay, 1 is the population average there are gay men who are less than 5 in one..

Possibly a great number with a smalle portion being ‘super promiscious’ enough to impact the average dramatically. 3. Original Essay? Again given this, are there no gay men who have no partners per month? Who, for whatever reason, have not had any sex or haven’t had any in a while? Or perhaps are having (gay) sex on rare occassions like what we suspect of Idaho’s Senator Larry Craig? How does the study capture these men and ap bio evolution test essay, add their data to properly calculate the essay, average? If part of your argument is hitched to a social science statistic then you’re on a foundation of sand and one of the worse things you can do is read too much into an average. The ‘we’ here is American society at guestbook large. That 50% divorce rate is what is generally quoted for American society as a whole, not just Christians alone. But you kind of essay, prove my point about how advocates for daughters american revolution monosexed “marriage” would fight against repeal of No-Fault just as nastily as they fight for original monosexed “marriage”.

Last time I checked it was alive and research papers on water purification, well and essay writing, hasn’t fallen even though it is honor in laurence margaret river, highly unpopular among other Christians, not supported by civil marriage law and is even unpopular among many Catholics. It still fits the bill of essay writing, what ex-preacher was suggesting should or rather could happen. What’s your point? I don’t know why you continue to presume to speak for Christians when you are not one. I guess we just expected something more from someone from the ‘pro-American’ portion of the country.

It’s not the advanced 2.3, first time smmtheory has disappointed. Well, yes, I can see where you would be disappointed about having your hypocrisy with respect to adultery pointed out. After all, isn’t hypocrisy considered the gravest of all sins among the moral relativists? It still fits the bill of what ex-preacher was suggesting should or rather could happen. Essay? What’s your point?

I don’t know why you continue to presume to speak for Christians when you are not one. I speak only for myself and I feel sorry for any group that requires you to speak for them. As for essay the Catholic Church, I fail to see the problem. If you abide by original their teachings about marriage, you will not get remarried if divorced despite the fact that civil law has no objection (and many evangelical churchs might welcome your remarriage with open arms). The Catholic Church doesn’t require the hva er et essay, gov’t to bribe people to follow their teachings, why do you? Well, yes, I can see where you would be disappointed about having your hypocrisy with respect to adultery pointed out. Original Essay? After all, isn’t hypocrisy considered the gravest of all sins among the papers on water purification, moral relativists? 1. You failed to point out any hypocrisy on my part or anyone elses. 2. I’m not a moral relativist, but wouldn’t a ‘gravest sin’ among relativists be something of a contradiction? Kind of like an underdressed nudist? There is original essay, huge misunderstanding from ‘No’ side of prop 8. Most people in ‘No’ side of prop 8 misuderstand that the the same sex marriage is one of civi right movement in line with the past civil right movement started in 1960s.

The past civil right movoment was not about ‘WHAT’ but about ‘HOW’. In other words, the movement has targeted to break down twisted social hierachy in order to give all social members equality. The real civil right movement have never attempted to destroy fundamental ‘WHAT’ of this society. However the same sex marriage is quite different than the real civil right movement because it is targeting to hva er et essay, destruct our society into complete mess and uncontrollable status. They are destroying the fundamental ‘WHAT’. IT WILL EVENTUALLY TRIGGER ‘THE END OF WORLD’. And actually the destruction path might be guaranteed for human_being just because of this disastful concept of same sex marriage. Look beyond 20 years from now and consider how this world will be like.

I am very concerning for my next generation just because of writing, this kind of sinful movement. Daughters Revolution Essay? Please look at your conscience and watch for what will happen next. They are destroying the fundamental ‘WHAT’.IT WILL EVENTUALLY TRIGGER ‘THE END OF WORLD’. Do you always tune up the rhetoric when you’re losing an argument? Look beyond 20 years from now and consider how this world will be like. I see two likely possibilities: A: 20 years from writing, now a tiny portion of gays use gay marriage. Discussion? Many that did got burned badly when failed relationships left them dividing assets and paying alimony to partners they no longer wanted to be with. B: 20 years from now a portion of gays use gay marriage. Like other demographic groups they have ‘success rates’ (defined as no divorces within 5 years of essay writing, marriage) that are sometimes greater and sometiems smaller than heterosexuals as a whole or sub-cohorts of heterosexuals. In both cases the existence of gay marriage has no detectable impact on the far more popular heterosexual marriages (about 95% of all marriages).

Like today some churches recognize gay marriages, others do not. 2.3? There is probably more acceptance of gay marriage itself in essay, the population but again it is nearly impossible to detect any impact positive or negative on heterosexual marriage. Can you give us a plausible future scenario? I’ve asked several times now for ‘yes’ supporters to show exactly how existence of marriage for a small minority group directly impacts their ability to daughters american revolution, be good husbands, wives, fathers, and mothers. Connect the writing, dots for us.

The Catholic Church doesn’t require the crossing honor margaret river, gov’t to bribe people to writing, follow their teachings, why do you? And just where do you think I do require the essay advanced guestbook 2.3, government to bribe people to essay writing, follow the civic law? If there is a specific argument I have made, please point it out. Daughters Of The? As I have stated, I would gladly give up any supposed benefits the government apportions to marriage if it meant the advocates for monosexed marriage would quit advocating for government recognition. Original? I could care less whether or not churches outside of Christianity condone such practices. There have even been churches that were nominally inside of Christianity who have turned their backs on Christianity and condoned such practices as monosexed marriage. Essay Guestbook? What I do care about is the damage that is being done to children through the writing, government recognition of monosexed marriages. Our laws should be used to protect the essay, least able to protect themselves, and original essay, this is being used to run roughshod over the children by adults who refuse to be adults. 1. You failed to point out any hypocrisy on my part or anyone elses.

2. I’m not a moral relativist, but wouldn’t a ‘gravest sin’ among relativists be something of hva er et essay, a contradiction? Kind of like an underdressed nudist? 1. No, I didn’t fail to point it out, you failed to acknowledge that I pointed it out. It looks like you have a mental block against recognizing that you seem to have a problem with McCain’s adultery whereas you have no problem with Clinton’s. 2. Well if you talk like a moral relativist, you might ought to expect being pegged as a moral relativist, and original writing, hypocrisy IS a contradiction. Please read carefully my point in line. It is clear that the issue of “Interracial marriage bans” is completly different with “Same sex marriage” issue. I believe that it was absolutely right to abolish the Interracial marriage bans. And also I STRONGLY supported for the other civil right movements of the past. However Homosexuality absolutely cannot be civil right movement, simply because it can destruct human_being.

If you can see further down the road, you might be able to ap bio evolution, see my point about why it can be disatrous to the human being and next generation. What I do care about is the damage that is original writing, being done to children through the government recognition of monosexed marriages. Our laws should be used to protect the least able to protect themselves, and this is being used to run roughshod over the children by adults who refuse to essay advanced guestbook 2.3, be adults. OK, please be specific here. Children are generated by heterosexuals except in the rather limited case of writing, test tube babies. So what exactly are you talking about?

looks like you have a mental block against recognizing that you seem to have a problem with McCain’s adultery whereas you have no problem with Clinton’s. I don’t have any particular problem with McCain’s adultery. I wasn’t part of his marriage, it is test essay, primarily his concern. I have my own problems to deal with. 2. Original Essay Writing? Well if you talk like a moral relativist, you might ought to expect being pegged as a moral relativist, and hypocrisy IS a contradiction. You ‘might ought’ put more effort into your own arguments. You asked a question and I tried to answer it as best I could. Essay Honor In Laurence Margaret River? Please try to return the favor. Connect the dots for us because quite frankly I have no idea what you’re talking about and I suspect you’re pumping up the rhetoric without thinking about the debts your reasoning and logic skills are going to have to make good on. If part of your argument is hitched to a social science statistic then you’re on a foundation of sand and one of the original, worse things you can do is writing thesis chapter, read too much into writing an average.

Ii think we are in violent agreement here, but since my post turned out to be a festival of editing errors, I will restate. Dustin used a number of statistics. Collectively, they beg disbelief. If homosexuals are both, as a group, promiscuous, and the rate of contracting AIDS is one in 175 unique encounters, then there are no homosexuals. Ap Bio Evolution Test? Granted, I was exaggerating a little; I should have said there would be no, or very few, gays who survive past middle age. In other words, on the face of it, one of those two statistics must be wrong. Not that it matters, because, as you (at least I think it was you) pointed out above, applying such reasoning to gays, but neglecting to original essay, do so for heterosexuals, rather reeks of hypocrisy. As I have stated, I would gladly give up any supposed benefits the government apportions to marriage if it meant the advocates for monosexed marriage would quit advocating for government recognition. So, let me get this straight. You want non-sectarian government to ap bio test essay, adopt a specifically sectarian position, while allowing sects to do whatever they want? Christianity defines homosexuality as immoral.

What if Christianity is wrong? It’s tedious work but it is often interesting to probe suspect stats a bit deeper. Whether it’s a political group or a company trying to sell you soap never underestimate how brazen statistics hawkers are with trying to essay, snow their readers over. For example: 78% of ap bio, lesbians have reported domestic abuse related problems. If you follow the link you find an unfootnoted statement that: “78% of lesbians report that they have either defended themselves or fought back against original writing, an abusive partner” First problem, it is not specified whether ‘partner’ is only female partners or female and male (there are lesbians who have had relationships with men you know). Second problem, the papers, second page of writing, this document lists ‘types of hva er et essay, abuse’….including ‘instigates feelins of shame’ as part of sexual abuse, ‘financial abuse’ that includes using ‘monetary resources of the partner or of the essay, relationship’ without the other’s consent….’beauty-ism’….basically this metric seems to hva er et essay, include a lot more than what many of us think of when we hear ‘domestic abuse’. Original Writing? This isn’t just your ‘Burning Bed’ stuff but also what a lot of heterosexual couples would consider fighting over money and so on. Writing Thesis Discussion? Not only original, that, if one partner in revolution, any relationship ever felt like they were being made to feel self conscious about their looks, intelligence, money or whatnot that too counts as ‘abuse’. What’s amazing isn’t so much a 78% abuse rate, it’s amazing that we don’t have a 100% rate for all relationships under this measure.

Another clue that we are seeing a distorted statistic, the original, phrase: “18% of this group described their behavior as self-defense or ‘trading blow for blow or insult for insult'” Insult for ap bio evolution insult? Are we talking about an essay writing, accurate measure of abuse here or are we seeing an organization with good intentions over-hyping abuse? However, within the homosexual community, infidelity is the norm. Recent studies show that 95.6% of gay men report infidelity in their current relationship. Numerous studies reveal that, among self-described committed homosexual couples, each individual has had an average of 3-5 partners a year. This link is pretty amazing because it is an FRC one. What Dusty doesn’t tell us is: 29% of gay relationships in the study have lasted longer than 8 years. 29% lasted 4-7 years. 11% less than 1 year. This is a somewhat amzing 60% of relationships lasting 4 or more years.

Amazing because there is advanced guestbook, almost no legal status to essay writing, hold the relationship together. It does indeed strike one as odd that gay men are enjoying 5 partners per month but at the same time a majority are sticking with one person for years. Here is the fact, conservatives know better. Years ago feminists were complaining about the superbowel being a time of record domestic violence of daughters of the essay, men against women. Conservatives took apart the essay, numbers and demonstrated quite nicely there was no scientific basis to them at all.

So the right has…or at least had…the ability to discussion, talk intelligently about statistics. What accounts for original writing this newfound ignorance? So, let me get this straight. You want non-sectarian government to essay advanced 2.3, adopt a specifically sectarian position, while allowing sects to do whatever they want? I don’t believe that it is original essay writing, specifically a sectarian position. A lot of non-believers think that monosexed “marriage” is invalid also, and may also believe that it is immoral. I don’t care to interfere in what the homosexuals do in the privacy of their own sects and homes.

I do believe though that the non-sectarian government should protect children from the violence that such an writing, arrangement entails. If homosexuals want to original writing, pretend they are married, they should be allowed to pretend, but since their arrangement would not naturally produce children, children should be lawfully excluded from their midst. Christianity defines homosexuality as immoral. What if Christianity is wrong? Christianity isn’t wrong about advanced guestbook 2.3 that, but even if I grant you the position for original argument’s sake, where is the harm of being told that it is immoral? If Christianity is right though, the harm is much worse thinking that it is not. It’s tedious work but it is often interesting to probe suspect stats a bit deeper. Whether it’s a political group or a company trying to sell you soap never underestimate how brazen statistics hawkers are with trying to advanced, snow their readers over.

For example: 78% of lesbians have reported domestic abuse related problems. If you follow the link you find an unfootnoted statement that: “78% of lesbians report that they have either defended themselves or fought back against an abusive partner” First problem, it is not specified whether ‘partner’ is only female partners or female and original writing, male (there are lesbians who have had relationships with men you know). Second problem, the second page of daughters essay, this document lists ‘types of original essay, abuse’….including ‘instigates feelins of test, shame’ as part of original essay writing, sexual abuse, ‘financial abuse’ that includes using ‘monetary resources of the partner or of the relationship’ without the other’s consent….’beauty-ism’….basically this metric seems to include a lot more than what many of us think of when we hear ‘domestic abuse’. This isn’t just your ‘Burning Bed’ stuff but also what a lot of heterosexual couples would consider fighting over money and so on.

Not only that, if one partner in any relationship ever felt like they were being made to feel self conscious about their looks, intelligence, money or whatnot that too counts as ‘abuse’. What’s amazing isn’t so much a 78% abuse rate, it’s amazing that we don’t have a 100% rate for all relationships under this measure. Another clue that we are seeing a distorted statistic, the phrase: “18% of american, this group described their behavior as self-defense or ‘trading blow for blow or insult for insult'” Insult for original insult? Are we talking about an accurate measure of abuse here or are we seeing an organization with good intentions over-hyping abuse? However, within the homosexual community, infidelity is the norm. Advanced Guestbook? Recent studies show that 95.6% of gay men report infidelity in their current relationship. Numerous studies reveal that, among self-described committed homosexual couples, each individual has had an average of 3-5 partners a year. This link is pretty amazing because it is an FRC one. What Dusty doesn’t tell us is: 29% of gay relationships in original essay writing, the study have lasted longer than 8 years.

29% lasted 4-7 years. 11% less than 1 year. This is a somewhat amzing 60% of daughters american revolution, relationships lasting 4 or more years. Original? Amazing because there is almost no legal status to hold the relationship together. It does indeed strike one as odd that gay men are enjoying 5 partners per month but at the same time a majority are sticking with one person for years. Here is the advanced 2.3, fact, conservatives know better.

Years ago feminists were complaining about the original essay, superbowel being a time of record domestic violence of men against women. Conservatives took apart the numbers and demonstrated quite nicely there was no scientific basis to them at ap bio evolution test essay all. So the right has…or at least had…the ability to essay writing, talk intelligently about statistics. What accounts for this newfound ignorance? I do believe though that the non-sectarian government should protect children from the violence that such an arrangement entails. What exactly are you talking about? What exactly are you talking about? I am referring to crossing honor in laurence margaret river, the violence done to children by essay exposing them to writing, homosexuals pretending to be married to essay, each other. Whether it’s a political group or a company trying to sell you soap never underestimate how brazen statistics hawkers are with trying to snow their readers over.

This is a somewhat amzing 60% of relationships lasting 4 or more years. Amazing because there is almost no legal status to hold the crossing river, relationship together. It does indeed strike one as odd that gay men are enjoying 5 partners per month but at essay writing the same time a majority are sticking with one person for years. Need I say more Mr. Statistics Hawker? So your not actually talking about gay marriage but children ‘exposed’ to gay couples. OK, next time please let us know before post 50 that we can ignore you. Need I say more Mr. Statistics Hawker? Nope, you guys are caught hawking bum stats.

I wouldn’t say anything more if I were you. I do believe though that the non-sectarian government should protect children from the discussion chapter, violence that such an arrangement entails. What point are you trying to make? Even if gay marriages to subject children to some sort of unique violence (I don’t have time to track down the link, but IIRC, lesbian couples have a far lower rate of child abuse than heterosexual couples with one step parent, particularly where the step parent is male), that really has nothing to do with gay marriage. Gays may already adopt children in many, if not most, states. Essay? In all states, they can produce children through artificial insemination or surrogate motherhood. If that is what bothers you, than is what you should be fighting against. However, as I mentioned above, even granting there is no fact that has been established by social science literature more convincingly than the thesis discussion chapter, following: all variables considered, children are best served when reared in a home with a married mother and father , that forces a false dichotomy. For those children adopted by gay couples, the choice isn’t between a family with a mother and father, but rather between an adopted family, or endless foster care. Given the original, true choice on offer, which is best for children? Christianity isn’t wrong about that, but even if I grant you the position for argument’s sake, where is the advanced guestbook, harm of being told that it is immoral?

Oh, the same kind of original essay, harm that comes from hva er et essay, certain Hindu sects deciding those suffering from cleft palate are possessed by the devil, or certain Christian sects having (no longer, thank goodness) that being left handed meant the original, same thing. I could go on, but I won’t, because the chapter, fatal weakness in that statement is how utterly un-American it is. You are branding every member of a group by the presumed characteristics of that group. Writing? That is pure tribalism. In contrast, the American ideal rests upon individual merit. Branding an crossing essay honor in laurence margaret, entire group immoral because of an original, innate characteristic reeks of the former. Which, BTW, is what makes the Christian / Islamic insistence that homosexuality is immoral so desperately wrong.

There is hva er et essay, no morality without agency. Gays have no choice in the matter, any more than straights do. Sex acts have no inherent moral value. The moral value attending a sex act derives wholly from essay, context: consensual sex within a monogamous relationship is moral, no matter the gender of the essay advanced, participants. To conclude otherwise, as I mentioned above, leaves you on the rocks of original writing, a theodicy problem for which you have no answer. What point are you trying to hva er et essay, make. I do not remember the writing, exact phraseology that Pope John Paul II used in saying it, but essentially he said that a homosexual couple raising a child does damage to that child. Branding an essay advanced, entire group immoral because of an innate characteristic reeks of the former. Which, BTW, is what makes the essay writing, Christian / Islamic insistence that homosexuality is advanced guestbook, immoral so desperately wrong.

There is no morality without agency. Essay? Gays have no choice in the matter, any more than straights do. Not so, homosexuality is a choice, not an innate quality. Every consensual sex act requires a choice of crossing essay honor in laurence margaret river, whether to engage in it or not. The moral value attending a sex act derives wholly from context: consensual sex within a monogamous relationship is moral, no matter the essay writing, gender of the participants. Setting aside the fact that I disagree about whether or not the writing thesis chapter, moral value of a sex act derives entirely from the context, your context is out of original essay, whack. The only essay advanced guestbook, morally good context is between husband and wife. To conclude otherwise, as I mentioned above, leaves you on the rocks of a theodicy problem for which you have no answer. Given the proper context, there is no need for theodicy, there is no conundrum, it is simple and straight-forward without nuance. Homosexual sex is not between husband and wife, so it is therefore immoral. I do not remember the essay writing, exact phraseology that Pope John Paul II used in hva er et essay, saying it, but essentially he said that a homosexual couple raising a child does damage to that child.

You’re right, such children should just be aborted. More seriously, though, this has nothing to do with gay marriage. The question to essay writing, ask is what is the alternative? By definition adopted children are cases where, for whatever reason, the thesis, heterosexual parents are unable to implement the ideal for essay their child (whether it’s their fault or not). You can complain, I suppose, about children created through IVF for gay couples but the question is what is the alternative? Would you rather have life with two gay parents or have no life at all? I do not remember the exact phraseology that Pope John Paul II used in saying it, but essentially he said that a homosexual couple raising a child does damage to that child. With respect to what, exactly? While I haven’t checked up on ap bio test this to be sure, I’ll bet all adoption agencies put homosexual couples way down the original essay, priority list.

That means, IIRC, gay couples are adopting children no one else will. So, I’ve asked before, and I’ll ask again: which is worse, adoption by a gay couple, or foster care? Not so, homosexuality is a choice, not an innate quality. Homosexuality, i.e., possessing a mating preference for the same sex, is as innate as handedness or eye color. Orientation and hva er et essay, action are two different things. Which leaves the theodicy problem still in front of you. You could relieve that problem by writing concluding that those who wrote the Bible presumed the drive behind same-sex acts was a choice, and, therefore, concluded — wrongly — that engaging in them was based upon choice. Of course, to do that would hole Biblical credibility below the water line. Heck of daughters american, a place — stuck between the devil of theodicy, and the deep blue sea of discrediting the Bible. The only morally good context is between husband and wife.

Why? What it it about writing homosexual sex that makes it immoral? Beware of the Euthyphros dilemma, BTW. Full disclosure: my brother is gay. Consequently, I have a fair amount of first hand experience with gays. The notion that they are somehow irredeemably immoral in ways the of the american essay, rest of us are not is complete crap, and original essay writing, deserves precisely the same respect that, say, anti-Judaism does. Why are my posts not posting? It appears that if I post concerning the subject at hand, no post. But if I post concerning . . Crossing River? . Essay? nothing . . . it posts. Why? What does it mean when it says my post is being held by the owner of the blog?

This blog has a spam filter. Sometimes whenever there’s an issue that involves any sexuality-type of topic it snags comments, thinking they are spam. I sometimes email Joe when that happens or you can try to rewrite your blog using slightly different words (like SSM instead of same sex marriage). I don’t know if Joe is still managing the filter or not so there might be no one at the switch to evolution test essay, approve comments that are held. It’s usually better to rewrite your post because by the time the comment is original essay, cleared people will mostly be reading only the hva er et essay, newest comments at the bottom of the thread and original, will not notice that a comment has appeared in the center. “Not so, homosexuality is a choice, not an revolution essay, innate quality.” I feel that this really is at the root of a lot of misunderstandings about homosexuality. It is quite definitely not a choice. Trust me on this.

I’ve always found it an apt metaphor to compare homosexuality to original essay, left-handedness. Writing Discussion Chapter? Both are inbuilt preferences – inclinations towards certain behaviour. Most people are right-handed, just as most people are heterosexual. Homosexuals CAN teach themselves to sleep with women in the same way that a left-handed person CAN teach themselves to write or use scissors with their right hand, but it will always feel counter-intuitive for them. For them, it will never feel (ironically considering common objections to homosexuality) natural. It is writing, a choice whether to admit to essay in laurence margaret, yourself and others around you that you are gay. But you can no more change your sexual orientation than you can change which hand you prefer.

Just so you know, you’ve erected a straw man with you theodicy problem or the Bible’s wrong canard. Original Writing? The doctrine of original sin answers why someone’s sexual orientation can be perverted even from birth, and chapter, someone’s choice to act on writing a sinful impulse is no excuse. Just because someone may like to steal…alot…is no excuse for them to pillage the crossing essay margaret, village. Wow! Maybe I’m in a little gay bubble in Los Angeles, but all the gay couples I know (and I know a ton, mind you) are older and very monogamous.

In fact, they are quite boring. Some have adopted, and they are wonderful parents. I think many ignorant folk here imagine the gay community as just guys in ass-less chaps on a gay pride float. Original Essay Writing? It would be like thinking of heterosexuals on Spring Break in Fort Lauderdale. I still haven’t heard from any of of the revolution, you a good argument on exactly how two women walking the aisle will personally ruin your own marriage. Whether it’s a political group or a company trying to sell you soap never underestimate how brazen statistics hawkers are with trying to snow their readers over. And not long after you wrote that, in the very same comment even, you started hawking statistics yourself. Were you trying to writing, snow the revolution, readers over? You made your own interpretation of statistics to favor your argument. This is a somewhat amzing 60% of original essay writing, relationships lasting 4 or more years. Amazing because there is almost no legal status to hold the relationship together.

It does indeed strike one as odd that gay men are enjoying 5 partners per month but at the same time a majority are sticking with one person for years. Would you think it so odd if the same statistics applied to married heterosexuals? I predict that you would not, and that you would attribute it to infidelity. You left unstated your implication that the statistics were contradictory and wrong based on your assumption that there was no infidelity in the more or less long-term relationships between practicing homosexuals. And not long after you wrote that, in the very same comment even, you started hawking statistics yourself.

Yea I looked at some of the reports that were being cited by YOU GUYS. You left unstated your implication that the statistics were contradictory and wrong based on your assumption that there was no infidelity in the more or less long-term relationships between practicing homosexuals. I certainly made no assumption that there would be no infidelity among long term gay couples nor did I assume that infidelity rates would be equal to purification, or lower than heterosexual couples. Take a peek at original writing post 48 if you need a refresher. I suspect all things being equal long term lesbian relationships would probably have lower infidelity rate than heterosexuals as a whole while long term gay male relationships would have a higher one…. Would you think it so odd if the writing thesis discussion chapter, same statistics applied to married heterosexuals? No but that’s not the point. Essay Writing? The point is it’s pretty amazing if the only information you had was Richard’s sensationalistic reading of the hva er et essay, primary sources.

While I haven’t checked up on this to be sure, I’ll bet all adoption agencies put homosexual couples way down the priority list. Some of them, mostly religiously affiliated adoption services. Original? I don’t believe that publicly funded adoption services do place homosexual couples below heterosexual couples. Catholic affiliated adoption services certainly do not place children with homosexual couples. Thesis Chapter? Activists sometimes apply legal pressure to force them to, but usually that sort of coercion only persuades them to shut down rather than operate against writing, doctrinal beliefs and 2.3, policy. Between the writing, two choices of foster home care and placement with a homosexual couple, the foster home placement is preferable in my opinion. Homosexuality, i.e., possessing a mating preference for the same sex, is as innate as handedness or eye color.

To pick a nit with your statement… homosexual practice is daughters revolution, not a mating practice. Homosexual acts can no more produce offspring than self pleasuring alone at home. Essay Writing? If a person really wants to mate, they go to the opposite sex. Preferences are choices. Putting little or no thought into it does not make it any less a choice than a well thought out decision. Between the ap bio, two choices of foster home care and placement with a homosexual couple, the foster home placement is preferable in original essay writing, my opinion. Florida, I believe, prohibits gay adoption but permits gay foster parents. Evolution Essay? Forcing a kid to grow up with no real parents, to live on edge of being whisked away from the caretakers he lives with isn’t doing them any favors. The call that should be made here is what is best for the child, not the ideological fixations of the evangelical right. If they want to stop gay adoption they should swarm the adoption agencies with applications from well adjusted, happy heterosexual couples open to adding adopted and foster kids to their families. If they want to stop gay adoption they should swarm the adoption agencies with applications from original writing, well adjusted, happy heterosexual couples open to adding adopted and foster kids to their families.

I totally agree! This whole argument seems to me, as a Christian, rather fruitless. Here is why evangelical Christians will never accept gay marriage: The Bible says that homosexual behavior is sinful. Period. Papers? It doesn’t matter what stats are brought up, and it doesn’t matter about biology. The only way you can convince an evangelical/Bible believing Christian to ever vote against Prop 8 is to make them take the Bible less seriously. Conversely, I seriously doubt that statistics are going to convince a homosexual that he or she is an unfit parent b/c some homosexuals are promiscuous or mean or whatever.

I’m not going to original, stop pursuing adoption b/c some other “Christian” beats their children. That’s ridiculous. The problem here for anti-Prop 8 folks is not stats; it’s the Bible. Homosexual sex, just like heterosexual sex outside of marriage, is research papers on water, sinful. The only way you can convince an evangelical/Bible believing Christian to ever vote against Prop 8 is to make them take the Bible less seriously. The Bible does not require a scorched earth, take no prisoners jihad against all secular law.

Don’t believe in gay marriage, don’t get gay married. Reject membership in original, any Church that has gay marriage. Tell gay married friends that you think they are making a major mistake with their lives. If they are convinced by your arguments, great. If not you leave them alone. This is what Catholics who take the church’s doctrine on divorce seriously. Just so you know, you’ve erected a straw man with you theodicy problem or the Bible’s wrong canard.

The doctrine of original sin answers why someone’s sexual orientation can be perverted even from birth, and honor river, someone’s choice to act on a sinful impulse is no excuse. Original Writing? Just because someone may like to daughters of the, steal…alot…is no excuse for them to original essay, pillage the village. No, I didn’t erect a strawman. This is very much a theodicy problem. How do you vindicate divine goodness and providence in light of the fact that God specifically created homosexuals, who have utterly no choice in essay 2.3, the matter, then went on original essay to direct people to kill those caught engaging in homosexual acts? This goes well beyond the ap bio evolution test essay, doctrine of original sin. Your analogy to theft is faulty. Until, that is, you can demonstrate how homosexuality breaks your leg or picks your pocket. Put it another way, other than on account of the Bible says so, why is homosexuality immoral?

I don’t believe that publicly funded adoption services do place homosexual couples below heterosexual couples. Actually, they do. Every adoption agency I have ever heard of does extensive background checks, and puts M-F married couples at the top of the list (all other things being equal; clearly, there could be issues rendering some couples relatively unfit). Catholic affiliated adoption services certainly do not place children with homosexual couples. Not anymore, but they have. The Catholic Charities closed its adoption program in Massachusetts not because of the state’s gay marriage law but because of an existing gay anti-discrimination law. In fact, the charity had voluntarily placed older foster children in gay and lesbian households — the most willing to take hard-to-place children — until the essay writing, church hierarchy was alerted and of the american essay, demanded that adoptions conform to the church’s religious teaching, which was in conflict with state law. Raising once again the question: is it better that children grow up in foster care, or be adopted by a gay couple? Neither your opinion, nor mine matters here.

There is an objective truth out there, what is it? To pick a nit with your statement… homosexual practice is not a mating practice. Strictly speaking it is, because it is the original, result of the writing chapter, drive to mate. Putting little or no thought into original essay it does not make it any less a choice than a well thought out decision. Is your heterosexuality a choice? Could you decide to hva er et essay, engage in homosexuality? I’m going to go out on writing a limb here: No, and No.

You are denying to essay advanced, others that which you assume for yourself. Here is why evangelical Christians will never accept gay marriage: The Bible says that homosexual behavior is sinful. Period. That amounts to the good German defense. (See the Euthyphros dilemma, above). Thanks for the info . . . The Bible does not require a scorched earth, take no prisoners jihad against all secular law. Certainly not, but we still get a vote. And if we think a practice is evil, then we can vote no (or yes, as the writing, case may be.) In this case, I think homosexual sex is not only evil, I think calling the writing chapter, union of two homosexuals ‘marriage’ is absurd. The Bible says it is wickedness in no uncertain terms.

What else can I say? Now my reply is being held up … You’re not being asked to vote on whether or not you think gay sex is evil or not anymore than you are asked to vote on whether people who marry for money rather than love are evil or whether it’s evil to original essay writing, ditch your wife after she gets disfigured in research purification, a car accident…. Essay? There are plenty of things that one thinks are evil that are nonetheless legal and test, it doesn’t follow that just being evil is original essay writing, sufficient to justify making it illegal. Just so you know, you’ve erected a straw man with you theodicy problem or the american, Bible’s wrong canard. The doctrine of essay, original sin answers why someone’s orientation can be perverted even from birth, and someone’s choice to act on a sinful impulse is no excuse. Research On Water Purification? Just because someone may like to steal…alot…is no excuse for original essay writing them to pillage the village. No, I didn’t erect a strawman. This is very much a theodicy problem. How do you vindicate divine goodness and providence in daughters of the revolution essay, light of the fact that God specifically created homos*xuals, who have utterly no choice in the matter, then went on to direct people to kill those caught engaging in homos*xual acts? This goes well beyond the doctrine of original sin.

Your analogy to theft is original, faulty. Until, that is, you can demonstrate how someone else’s being gay breaks your leg or picks your pocket. Put it another way, other than on account of the Bible says so, why is being gay immoral? I don’t believe that publicly funded adoption services do place homos*xual couples below heteros*xual couples. Actually, they do. Every adoption agency I have ever heard of crossing in laurence river, does extensive background checks, and puts M-F married couples at the top of the list (all other things being equal; clearly, there could be issues rendering some couples relatively unfit). Catholic affiliated adoption services certainly do not place children with same gender couples.

Not anymore, but they have. The Catholic Charities closed its adoption program in Massachusetts not because of the state’s gay marriage law but because of an existing gay anti-discrimination law. In fact, the charity had voluntarily placed older foster children in gay and original writing, lesbian households — the hva er et essay, most willing to original writing, take hard-to-place children — until the church hierarchy was alerted and papers on water, demanded that adoptions conform to the church’s religious teaching, which was in conflict with state law. Raising once again the question: is it better that children grow up in foster care, or be adopted by original essay writing a gay couple? Neither your opinion, nor mine matters here. There is an hva er et essay, objective truth out there, what is original writing, it? To pick a nit with your statement… homos*xual practice is not a mating practice. Strictly speaking it is, because it is the result of the drive to mate. Putting little or no thought into essay in laurence margaret it does not make it any less a choice than a well thought out original, decision. Is your being straight a choice?

Could you decide to become gay, even for a day? I’m going to go out on a limb here: No, and No. You are denying to others that which you assume for yourself. Here is why evangelical Christians will never accept gay marriage: The Bible says that gay behavior is sinful. Period. That amounts to the good German defense. Ap Bio Evolution Test? (See the original essay, Euthyphros dilemma, above). Yes, you did erect a strawman. Presumably, you are arguing against someone like myself. I believe that men are inherently sinful b/c we fell in Adam.

God is not obligated to rescue us from sin of any kind: homos*xual s*x is just one of those. Advanced Guestbook? It’s no problem of original writing, “theodicy” because we are all guilty of hva er et essay, sin. It goes like this: God created man good. Man sinned and became sinful. God is under no obligation to rectify this (even though He has for original essay writing all who believe in Jesus.) People perish, Skipper, because they refuse to believe the truth of God in daughters american, Jesus Christ. Do you want to original essay, escape the wrath to come?

Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and you will be saved. If you don’t believe and you perish, don’t blame God. Put it another way, other than on account of the Bible says so, why is being gay immoral? The Bible gives us truth. I read this as saying, “Other than on account of it being true that homosexuality is immoral, why is being gay immoral?” What I think and you think is irrelevant if the essay honor in laurence margaret river, Bible is true.

Why should I leave the essay, Bible as true for someone else’s stats and pontifications? That amounts to thesis discussion, the good German defense. Does this look like German to you?: “Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God” (1 Cor. 6:9). Besides, Thomas Aquinas and original writing, others have dealt with the supposed Euthyphros dilemma before. He also found it to be a false dilemma. Here’s one example I took from the “Stand to Reason” site: An objective standard exists (this avoids the first horn of the dilemma). However, the standard is not external to hva er et essay, God, but internal (avoiding the writing, second horn). Writing Thesis Chapter? Morality is grounded in the immutable character of essay writing, God, who is perfectly good. Of The American Revolution? His commands are not whims, but rooted in His holiness.

My point in all this is essay writing, that you will never win a Bible believing Christian to your view. Conversely, I don’t know why anyone would be persuaded of the hva er et essay, Biblical view unless they have already submitted to original essay writing, the Lordship of research papers on water purification, Jesus Christ. Is your being straight a choice? Could you decide to become gay, even for writing a day? I’m going to go out on a limb here: No, and guestbook 2.3, No. That was indeed going out on writing a limb, and honor in laurence margaret river, the limb wasn’t even there to go out original essay writing, on. Yes, my personal s-exuality is a choice. If I chose to practice homos-exuality, I could. In fact, the charity had voluntarily placed older foster children in gay and lesbian households — the most willing to take hard-to-place children — until the hva er et essay, church hierarchy was alerted and demanded that adoptions conform to the church’s religious teaching, which was in conflict with state law. Let me translate this for writing you since you have erred. Some individuals within the agency went against Church doctrine to place those children in research on water, homos-exual settings.

It was NOT agency policy to be non-conforming to original writing, Church teaching. When the Church heirarchy found out about it, the people that erred in conformance were told to conform. In other words, if your employer has a policy that none of the on water, workers smokes at work and original essay, you sneakily do so, does that mean that your employer’s policy allows workers to smoke at work? Strictly speaking it is, because it is the result of the drive to mate. No, it is daughters american revolution essay, borne of a desire to self-pleasure. I THINK SAYIN YES TO PROP 8 IS HORRIBLE… I WOULD HAVE VOTED NO BUT IAM ONLY 17 YRS OLD.. I THINK PEOPLE SHOULD MARRY PEOPLE WHO THE LOVE. THERE IS NO RIGHT TO TAKE THAT AWAY FROM CURTIAN PEOPLE.. WHAT IF THEY SAID NOBODY CANT MARRY THE LOVE OF THEIR LIVES..

ITS NOT RIGHT.. IT DOSENT MATTER WHO U MARRY OR WHAT COLOR OR RACE.. EVERYONE SHOULD GET THE SAME RIGHT AS EVERYONE IN THE WORLD.. ITS NOT EVEN PEOPLES BUISNESS WHO PEOPLE MARRY ANYWAYZ.. NO ONE SHOULD BE TREATED DIFFERENTLY.. VOTING YES TO ME IS BULLS**T.. THIS IS MY OPINION.. AND I STICK WITH IT.. EVEN IN THE CONSTITUTION SAYS PEOPLE SHOULD BE TREATED THE SAME..

SO UR GOIN AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION.. I THINK SAYIN YES TO PROP 8 IS HORRIBLE… I WOULD HAVE VOTED NO BUT IAM ONLY 17 YRS OLD.. I THINK PEOPLE SHOULD MARRY PEOPLE WHO THE LOVE. THERE IS NO RIGHT TO TAKE THAT AWAY FROM CURTIAN PEOPLE.. Original? WHAT IF THEY SAID NOBODY CANT MARRY THE LOVE OF THEIR LIVES.. ITS NOT RIGHT.. IT DOSENT MATTER WHO U MARRY OR WHAT COLOR OR RACE.. EVERYONE SHOULD GET THE SAME RIGHT AS EVERYONE IN THE WORLD..

ITS NOT EVEN PEOPLES BUISNESS WHO PEOPLE MARRY ANYWAYZ.. NO ONE SHOULD BE TREATED DIFFERENTLY.. VOTING YES TO ME IS BULLS**T.. THIS IS MY OPINION.. AND I STICK WITH IT.. EVEN IN THE CONSTITUTION SAYS PEOPLE SHOULD BE TREATED THE SAME.. Daughters Of The Essay? SO UR GOIN AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION..

SMMTheory – Having gay sex does not make you gay. WANTING to original essay, have gay sex makes you gay. A gay person COULD sleep with a woman just as you COULD sleep with a man. Research On Water Purification? But it wouldn’t make him straight or you gay. What makes a person gay is their personal desires and inner thoughts, not their actions. And these are things obviously beyond our control. SMMTheory – And how did you arrive at the conclusion that homosexuality is original writing, about self-pleasuring? Has it ever occured to you that gay people fall in love? They are human beings too.

With regard to strawmen, you are evading the point at hand. The theodicy problem here is squaring God’s goodness and providence with God specifically creating people whose mating preference is for those of daughters american revolution, their own gender, then specifically commanding people to original essay writing, kill them (Lev 20:13 — well, men anyway) when acting upon the drive God uniquely gave them, then declared sinful in all its manifestations. This goes beyond problematic human nature (ignoring for the moment how God could have created men good and sinful at the same time) by placing a unique curse on a few people. Of course God does under no obligation to ap bio test essay, rectify that which God has caused. However, that is no advertisement for God’s goodness and original writing, providence. Hence, the unique theodicy problem: specifically creating a special kind of sinfulness, then directing people to papers on water purification, kill when it occurs. Does this look like German to you? Your citation of 1 Cor 6:9 is to assume the Good German defense. The inhabitants of that list are uniquely condemned, and you agree without questioning at original writing all why.

Among the infractions listed, homos-xuality is unique in that, in and of itself, it picks no one’s pocket, nor breaks anyone’s leg. The moment you accept something as so purely by argument from authority, you have adopted the Good German defense. Beyond that, though, who does that list omit? Anyone? You? I seem to remember Jesus saying something to the effect that sexually immoral thinking is hva er et essay, just as bad as act itself. Consequently, all you have managed to essay writing, conclude here is that homos-xuals are just as, but no more, condemned than the rest of us. Besides, Thomas Aquinas and others have dealt with the supposed Euthyphros dilemma before. Ap Bio Test? He also found it to be a false dilemma. Here’s one example I took from the “Stand to Reason” site: “An objective standard exists (this avoids the first horn of the dilemma).

However, the standard is essay, not external to guestbook, God, but internal (avoiding the essay writing, second horn). Morality is grounded in the immutable character of research on water purification, God, who is essay, perfectly good. His commands are not whims, but rooted in His holiness.” The trouble with this being that once the theological debris is cleared and you understand what it is they’re getting at, you find yourself right back at the first horn. Thesis Chapter? If goodness is part of God’s nature, then goodness is not something God has any control over, and divine command theory is incorrect. That was indeed going out on a limb, and writing, the limb wasn’t even there to go out on. Yes, my personal s-exuality is a choice. If I chose to practice homos-exuality, I could.

That is an empty assertion. You could choose to dress a pig in a tutu and paint it green. But since you never would actually make that choice, making that statement is no better than attempting to ap bio, assert a null. Let me translate this for you since you have erred. Some individuals within the agency went against original, Church doctrine to daughters of the, place those children in homos-exual settings. It was NOT agency policy to be non-conforming to original essay writing, Church teaching. I didn’t err — it actually happened; whether it accorded with Church doctrine is a separate matter.

However, it is worth bringing up in writing thesis, its own right, because it reiterates a question I have raised before, but you have avoided. Which is worse, having same-s*x couples adopt a child, or that child being raised in foster homes? If the latter (and I strongly suspect that is original writing, true), then Church doctrine amounts to enforcing a choice detrimental to the children for whom the ideal choice does not exist. I’m glad I don’t have to defend that position. Strictly speaking it is, because it is the result of the thesis discussion chapter, drive to mate. No, it is borne of a desire to original writing, self-pleasure. No more than heteros-xuality is. That the writing discussion, coupling can’t result in offspring doesn’t mean the desire to couple doesn’t have the same basis.

IMHO, gays should have simply left well enough alone for another ten years. By which time nearly everyone will view this kerfuffle through the same lens we now view, say, miscegenation: what the heck were they thinking? In the meantime, there is nothing to be gained by annoying those whose religious precepts still make it moral to writing, ostracize an entire group of people simply for papers on water purification the way they were born, for doing something that causes no one else any harm. What portion of the population was conceived out of a motive for original essay self-pleasure versus a purposeful motive of mating? Well, you partially got my point concerning human nature. I’m not going to go over the supposed two horns of the 2.3, dilemma you presented though. It has been satisfactorily answered for original essay a few hundred years now. Your “Good German” argument is precisely my point, except we’re not “Good Germans,” we’re “Good Evangelicals.” (Some of whom happen to ap bio, be good Germans.) All Bible-believing Christians appeal to essay writing, the Bible for their final authority.

We believe it to be an infallible source of truth. 2.3? Did you not know that? We have a host of reasons for believing this to original, be true, and you have probably heard them before and we’d stray from the point if we want there. So if your point is that I’ve believed that homosexuality is immoral simply b/c I read it in the Bible and accept it as authoritative, I’m willing to concede that. Discussion Chapter? There are other reasons for original believing this to be so, but that, in the end, is why evangelicals vote “Yes” to Prop 8. Everyone, ultimately, accepts an daughters american revolution, argument from authority. I do not accept the authority of Scripture uncritcally, there are reasons.

But I’ve tipped my hand for original you and shown you my cards. you know my source of authority. Research Purification? But it’s not enough for you to writing, smell my rotten egg; you’ve got to hva er et essay, lay your own. What is your authority? Man’s reason? Here’s the best part of what you said: Your citation of 1 Cor 6:9 is to assume the Good German defense. The inhabitants of that list are uniquely condemned, and you agree without questioning at original writing all why. Among the infractions listed, homos-xuality is unique in that, in in laurence river, and of itself, it picks no one’s pocket, nor breaks anyone’s leg. Beyond that, though, who does that list omit? Anyone?

You? I seem to essay writing, remember Jesus saying something to writing thesis discussion chapter, the effect that sexually immoral thinking is just as bad as act itself. I apologize if I wasn’t clear before, and though I’d be happy to essay, talk about it, I’m not interested in crossing honor in laurence margaret river, this forum in outlining all the ways in which homosexuality is original essay writing, harmful to crossing in laurence, those who practice it and for those who approve of it. My answers are Biblical anyway, and as I said before, I would not expect anyone to believe them if they haven’t first submitted to the Lordship of Jesus Christ anyway. But you are right.

1 Cor. 6:9 condemns all sorts of people in this passage. And Jesus did say that even calling your brother a “fool” puts one in danger of hellfire. So yeah, you’re right about Jesus being strict on sins other than those that pick my pocket and break my leg. So I whole-heartedly agree with this statement you made, and I applaud it: Consequently, all you have managed to conclude here is original essay writing, that homos-xuals are just as, but no more, condemned than the rest of us. There is hope for chapter sinners in the resurrected Jesus Christ. Swindlers, fornicators et al. That’s where I always want to wind up in the conversation. Before someone can see Christ Jesus as the only hope, they need to be aware of the reason that they need a hope, and pretending that certain things that are sinful and evil are actually good and approved will have the result of original essay, letting them continue to perdition without warning. Our real disagreement, the honor margaret, root of our disagreement, does not revolve around statistics and love and original, sexual inclination.

It revolves around what you and I believe about Jesus Christ and whether or not the crossing essay honor margaret river, Bible is true. Original Essay Writing? Right? We believe [the Bible] to be an infallible source of truth. That is the daughters of the revolution, problem. It is not infallible (Thou shalt not kill, thall shalt kill gays caught in the act). And, while it may be a source of truth, that does not mean everything in original essay, it is guestbook 2.3, true. The problem Evangelicals are faced with here is asserting homos-xuality is ipso facto immoral, because the Bible says so. No doubt, it clearly does. However, as I mentioned above, the original writing, notion of morality applies only to the extent there is free will. Because of this, among the hva er et essay, very few who still insist being gay is a matter of choice, Evangelicals are prominent. Yield on the matter of choice, then the whole question of original writing, morality starts looking irrelevant.

Worse, it provokes the crossing honor in laurence river, theodicy problem that you have pretty much ignored. Theodicy, in its simple form, attempts to vindicate divine goodness and providence in the view of the existence of evil. That really isn’t particularly difficult: humans would not be humans without free will; free will entails evil. However, that question gets much harder to deal with when acknowledging that God specifically created a subset of people who, having no choice in the matter, were going to be the target of essay writing, God-directed ostracism, opprobrium, and murder. People whose humanity, by the way, makes them as dependent upon mental and physical affection as you are. Of course, God can do anything God wants. But, if the crossing in laurence margaret river, words “goodness” and “providence” are to have any meaning whatsoever, then creating gays presents a glaring contradiction. That contradiction can only be resolved by original essay giving up on theodicy, or concluding that, in evolution test essay, the case, the Bible is wrong: being gay is not immoral, and morality of acting on that impulse is contained wholly within context: monogamous homos-xuality is no more immoral than monogamous heteros-xuality. Yielding that, however, admits that the writing, Bible is on water purification, not an original essay, infallible source of truth; rather, it contains assertions that are presented as true, but are, in fact, morally indefensible. What is research papers on water purification, your authority? Man’s reason?

Well, yes. Words have meanings. Original? In order for ap bio evolution test an action to be immoral, the actor must have a meaningful choice, the original writing, action cannot be imposed upon someone else, and the action cannot significantly impose upon guestbook, those not parties to the act. By all these measures, homos-xuality is no more immoral than heteros-xuality, because neither, absent context, has any moral content whatsoever. In other words, on this score, the original essay, Bible’s assertions are simply wrong. Whoever wrote those words was operating under a fundamental misapprehension, and falling prey to one of the research purification, most pernicious elements of original essay writing, human nature: the desire to demonize those who are different. I’m not interested in papers on water purification, this forum in outlining all the ways in which homosexuality is harmful to those who practice it and for those who approve of it. Well, perhaps you should be. Essay Writing? The alternative is to insist upon purification, the immorality of a group of people while leaving on the table precisely why they are immoral.

To the extent your answers are Biblical, the insistence upon original writing, making secular marriage unavailable to gays crumbles. There is thesis chapter, hope for sinners in the resurrected Jesus Christ. Essay Writing? Swindlers, fornicators et al. So, what happens to a monogamous gay couple who accepts Jesus as their savior? Are they uniquely condemned, as opposed to everyone else who accepts Jesus? If not, and I see no Biblical reason to conclude otherwise, then your citation of this passage doesn’t seem particularly relevant to the matter at hand. Our real disagreement, the root of our disagreement, does not revolve around statistics and love and evolution test essay, sexual inclination. It revolves around what you and writing, I believe about Jesus Christ and whether or not the research papers purification, Bible is true.

Right? Full disclosure: I am an essay writing, agnostic areligionist. (Agnostic, because I think the essay, question of whether a supreme being exists is unanswerable; areligionist because I think all religions are man made out of whole cloth). Now, that doesn’t mean that I would necessarily disagree with the conclusions of a scripturally based argument, regardless of how I think the Bible came to be. In this case, though, Evangelicals have arrived at a conclusion I believe to original essay, be profoundly immoral. That is hva er et essay, what this revolves around. That is the original, problem. Advanced Guestbook 2.3? It is not infallible. Well there you go! Is that an argument from essay writing, authority, btw? I’ll give you mine, “Yes, it is!”

In this case, though, Evangelicals have arrived at a conclusion I believe to be profoundly immoral. That is what this revolves around. In other words, “Evangelicals have believed the Bible, which I believe is research papers purification, profoundly immoral in regards to how it views homosexuality.” In another thread, Boonton mentioned that he believed himself to be an above average guy who is right about 54% of the time. I agree that he is writing, both intelligent and probably right more than he is wrong. Ap Bio Evolution Essay? So, why should I trade the Bible that is 100% right for original genius that is right only 60% or so? The Bible is 100% accurate, is it? May I ask – which version?

To name just a handful of the modern translations, there is the King James Version, the New King James Version, the Revised Standard Version, the New International Version, and the New American Standard Version. When we look back further through history, translations which are presumably closer to essay advanced, the original, we find, among others, the Codex Sinaiticus, the Codex Vaticanus and the Old Latin Vulgate. Obviously these are just a scant few of the more well known versions, and there are many, many more. Original Essay? And here’s the point – they all say different things. In most cases, the differences seem hugely insignificant, but the more distantly related the versions are, the more differences become apparent. They cannot ALL be correct.

So if you have miraculous insight into which particular version is THE authoratative version of the writing discussion, Bible (since they cannot all be true), then please do enlighten us. Thou shalt not kill. Thou shalt kill. It is worth noting here that any system of statements containing a contradiction may be used to prove any conclusion, no matter how absurd. That contradiction, taken from a couple Biblical passages, holes your claim to infallibility below the waterline. So, why should I trade the Bible that is 100% right for genius that is right only 60% or so? Every time religion has ostracized entire groups of people it has been wrong.

Think of the Reformation, or assigning to Jews the collective guilt of deicide. Your position really boils down to “on account of because.” You sidestep Euthyphros with a transparent dodge, and essay writing, fail to so much as take on board the evolution essay, theodicy problem. Yet you (and, I presume, all) Evangelicals seek to impose a sectarian beliefs upon a form of secular contract. That is ironic enough. The irony meter goes into original essay the red, though, on 2.3 noting that there is no barrier whatsoever to other sects performing sacred marriage upon whomever they choose. So, in the realm where Evangelicals really should have to original writing, justify themselves with something more than “on account of ap bio evolution essay, because” they don’t. And, in essay, the realm where Biblical inerrancy should make dissension on this matter non existent, it doesn’t. Within ten years, people are going to look back on in laurence the passage of essay writing, Prop 8 with this one question: what the heck were they thinking?

Richie asks what is “THE authoritative version . . .? Good question! THE answer is the Authorized Version, which is the only version without a copyright. It has been said, you can’t copywrite the hva er et essay, Word of God. The two ms. that you mentioned (Sinaticus and Vaticanus), not only disagreed between themselves, but with 95% of the extant Greek ms. in existence. They formed the basis of most of the modern translations. (Even the infamous “New World Translation” used the Wescott-Hort Greek). Of these two ms., one was found in a trash can and the other in essay writing, the Vatican Library. Both were of highly questionable value, besides their presumed antiquity.

There is no such thing as a perfect translation, but the Greek ms. upon essay advanced guestbook, which the English translation is made is essential to its accuracy. Check out “The Revision Revised” by John Burgon. for an eye opener. Richie asks, what is essay writing, THE authoritative version . . .?” The answer is THE Authorised Version. Since the beginning of recorded history there has never been same sex marriage`allowed in thesis chapter, any culture, at any time. But according to original essay, Skipper, in 10 years time everyone will asking “what the heck were we thinking” in refusing Prop 8? qwertyuio – I have to say it’s nice to hva er et essay, be given a straight answer.

However, things are not really so simple. For example, you cannot simply discount Sinaticus and Vaticanus simply because they disagree with most of the Greek manuscripts. Original? Imagine for a moment there is a book (Book 1). I make two copies of that book (Books 2 and 3), but in one copy (Book 3)I accidentally make an error. If the flawed copy is then taken and copied, then the new copy (Book 4) will also contain that flaw. Simply put, if Book 3 is taken and copied hundreds of times while Books 1 and 2 are not, then those two books will end up disagreeing with the vast majority of hva er et essay, texts, but that is obviously not good grounds to dismiss them. When we look at the earliest Greek manuscripts of the New Testament, the first problem is of course, that we do not have the originals for any of the New Testament books. The earliest copiest we have for the books date from between roughly 100 and 300 AD, and exist mostly in fragments.

The Codex Vaticanus is the earliest of the great parchment manuscripts at essay 300 AD. Now also consider that in this time there was no printing press, so everything had to be copied by hand in a time and research papers purification, society were very few were literate at essay writing all. Research Papers? This explains why the original essay, earliest manuscripts vary the most. The Authorized Version was written in the 17th century using existing English translations, but comparing them to the ancient Greek texts. It is therefore hugely important WHICH Greek texts they used, since they vary so much. How do we know they selected the right ones, if indeed, the research papers, ‘right ones’ have even survived? But all this history aside, interesting as it is, even the Authorized version contains contradictions.

To pull one at random, how did Judas Iscariot die? According to Matthew 27:3-8, he gave his silver to the priests, who used it to buy the Field of Blood – called so because they buried foreigners there, and then hanged himself. According to Acts 1:18-19, Judas himself bought the field and ‘fell headlong’ onto it so his guts burst out (nice), and this gave the field its name. How can the 100% accurate word of God contain such a blatant contradiction? Since the beginning of recorded history there has never been same sex marriage`allowed in essay writing, any culture, at any time.

But according to Skipper, in essay in laurence margaret river, 10 years time everyone will asking “what the heck were we thinking” in refusing Prop 8? Yep. Both demographics and people’s experience point in that direction. Younger people increasingly accept the writing, obvious, that homos-xuality is innate, not chosen. Also, familiarity has failed to breed contempt. As gays have come out advanced guestbook 2.3, of the original essay, closet, everyone else increasingly sees them as people, rather than contemptible perverts. So, I think it not only inevitable, but sooner rather than later that society will look at Prop 8 as a bloody minded denial of ap bio evolution test essay, a minority by a majority for essay whom the cost would have been nil. All based upon nothing more than “on account of Because.” What would have been your reaction in 1998 if someone was to insist that in 2008, a black man with the discussion, last name Obama would be elected president?

A thread on same sex marriage is not the place to go into too much detail on this matter. But I will say this and leave it to rest. Personally, I don’t care whether you believe me or not. If you are sincere in wanting to know more, I suggest that you google Wilber Pickering from the Greek department of essay, Dallas Theological Seminary (Try Pickering + KJV),or (David Fuller + KJV),or John Burgon + KJV). Do some research! The Authorized Version was written using Greek, (NOT English)texts as a base.

It was in agreement with no less than 95% of the 5000 existing Greek ms. Papers On Water? These copies and fragments do not vary much and one could reconstruct the entire NT (except for original essay writing a few verses) just by personal corresponsense letters of the church fathers. On the other hand the Sinaticus and discussion chapter, Vaticanus deviate over 3000 times from the “Majority Text” and leave out 200 verses found in the Authorized version. They were horrible texts and were not used, or replicated, for the very reason that they were horrible. Concerning the alledged contradiction of original essay, Judas’ death as described in the book of Matthew and Acts. Daughters Of The American? Matthew says he hanged himself. Luke says that he fell headlong into original a field and his guts burst out. In order for the latter to happen, he must have fallen from a distance, which logically could have occured when he hung himself.

He botched everything else in life, why not his own death? Why “headlong”? No one knows, perhaps he got caught up in the branches of the papers, tree that he hung himself on. I believe the essay, Word of God. When 90% can be proven true, I can accept the other 10% on faith. That is hva er et essay, my last word on this subject. . . qwertyu7, you are right that this is a little off-topic, but I had to answer the accusations against me.

I have indeed done some research. My understanding of the English origins of the Auhorized version comes from http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/02141a.htm. Be that as it may, your understanding of the Biblical scholarship is original essay writing, obviously lacking. Our earliest fragments of the essay 2.3, books that make up the Bible differ hugely. Essay? It was only with the invention of the printing press that any book could be reliably reproduced. The Sinaticus and Vaticanus are not freak versions which deviate thousands of times – ALL early Bible manuscripts differ; sometimes significantly, though mostly not. Of The Essay? There is no consensus or “majority text”. For a fuller explaination, see Bart Erhman’s Misquoting Jesus, or http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=vJluEnIqTVk. Finally, what is the 90% of the Bible that can be proven true? None of it can be.

You are taking the Bible ENTIRELY on faith as being even 90% true. Essay? For more on the historical inaccuracies in the Bible, see http://www.ebonmusings.org/atheism/otarch.html. I do see we are going off on a tangent though. I just had to speak out at the accusations that I had failed to crossing essay in laurence margaret, research these matters, or that the Bible can be proved to essay, be in the slightest bit accurate. 1. No accusations were made against you. 2. You are right The total number of departures of test essay, “the Sinaticus and Vaticanus are not freak versions that deviate thousands of times.” To be more precise these versions deviate over 36,000 times from the Majority Text.

3.The majority of the 5000 Greek ms. Original Essay? are in agreement. That is why the Majority Text is also called the “Received Text.” It is essentially what was recieved by the early church fathers. 4.You say that “there is no consensus, or Majority Text.” If you google “Majority Text” you will find 86,000,000 references. 5.You say that “none” of the Bible can be proven true. Advanced 2.3? B.J. Writing? Chesterton one of the world’s formost Mideast archeologists said that he has never found one thing in his archeological research that has ever contradicted a New Testiment statement. And he was a Jew! 5. You express doubt that the papers on water, Bible is the “slightest bit accurate.” The year is 2008 . . . since when? If I do not respond to your reply it is essay, because. I am undergoing a family crisis, and besides, I don’t want to hijack this thread. 1. Perhaps I spoke a little strongly there.

I meant no offence. 2, 3 #038; 4. I stand totally corrected. There IS a “majority text”. Essay Advanced Guestbook 2.3? You learn something new every day. However, according to original essay writing, the first site I visited, ‘The “Majority Text” is a statistical construct that does not correspond exactly to any known manuscript. It is arrived at by comparing all known manuscripts with one another and deriving from them the readings that are more numerous than any others.’ In other words, no single manuscript actually fits this ‘majority text’. It has been formed by looking at all the Bibe versions and fragments, (all of which disagree in one place or another) and in each case, favouring the evolution test essay, most numerous interpretation. However, as I think I demonstrated in comment 98, the most numerous account is not necessarily the most accurate.

If I make two copies of a book and one copy contains a mistake, but the flawed copy simply goes on to be copied more times, then this will be the most numerous version, and therefore the one to appear in the Majority Text. The Majority Text is doubtless an interesting focal point in Biblical scholarship, but there is no reason to suppose that this is more reliable or accurate than any other version. 5. ‘Not finding anything to contradict’ is not the same as proving. It’s like asking someone to prove a negative. If I said Oliver Twist was true and I could find no evidence in London to original, contradict this claim, that is a far cry from hva er et essay, saying I have proved it to original writing, be true. Indeed the most convincing argument against the inerrancy of the Bible is the lack of essay, evidence that we would expect to find if it was all true. for good examples of essay, this. 6. ‘2008 years since the birth of Jesus’, is the research on water, answer you are obviously fishing for. However, the BC/AD dating system was not invented until 525 AD, and was only original essay writing, slowly adopted in the West between the 8th and 14th centuries.

The entire dating system was drawn up by men who were deeply Christian, and centuries after Jesus supposedly lived. This obviously cannot constitute strong evidence for Jesus’ existence or Biblical accuracy. As a final point, I am sincerely sorry if you are having any personal troubles. I hope it is all sorted out soon. I won’t take it badly at all if you don’t respond. But I’m always happy to hva er et essay, debate it you do. Actually, a study done a couple of years ago found that whether or not couples were in original, a legal commitment was the evolution, factor in staying together, rather than sexual orientation. Writing? Unmarried same sex couples did not (if I remember correctly) break up at a greater rate than unmarried heterosexual couples. And frankly, if heterosexual couples don’t need any incentive to stay monogamous without a marriage, well, why do they bother marrying?

It sounds to evolution essay, me as if you’ve just argued that people can be just as committed living together as they are married. I only agree with like 2-things in here…But seriously, why take away a persons civil rights? That’s just so wrong! I mean really when all these church people and white trash gay bashers move in and try to take away their rights, it doesn’t make you look like you’re “proteacting” or “saving” marriage, it just looks like you’re being a whiney little bitch about it… I only agree with like 2-things in here…But seriously, why take away a persons civil rights? That’s just so wrong! I mean really when all these church people and white trash gay bashers move in essay writing, and try to take away their rights, it doesn’t make you look like you’re “proteacting” or “saving” marriage, it just looks like you’re being a whiney little bitch about it… I agree with you that there are other considerations about this issue than biblical ones. You mentioned some cultural ones, there are judicial /legal ones as well. Papers? (Is this right actually in essay writing, the Calif constitution, despite what the Supreme Court says?) This is not a Christian issue.

It’s about essay democratic majority rule, what rights are given to the minority and how to essay writing, properly protect those rights. See my blog, “Life in the Big Democracy” at http://www.sophiesladder.com. P.S. I found this blog from a link on “Blue Christian”. rbmhw sawicuv pmcthf rynhet gnljb bahez gfnjmtcy. rbmhw sawicuv pmcthf rynhet gnljb bahez gfnjmtcy. rbmhw sawicuv pmcthf rynhet gnljb bahez gfnjmtcy. i personall do not support gay marrige….here are a few reasons why.

2.how will this going to benefit the society….instead this will ruin the society. 3.legalizing gay marriage would open the doors to any body getting married, for example would you want your dog to get married to another dog of the research on water purification, same sex…..how is the dog going to be benefited?? 4.why is there this change. Original? …its not like divorce is not legal…i mean two people of the same sex can be good friends….how are they going to benefit the world….they can go out and watch movies or hand out research purification, together… 5.this is less meaningful to essay, the society. 6.there is research, a need of a family…you cant just adopt children from the orphanage…..one day the orphanage will run out of babies, then who will produces more babies or the essay, orphanage would not want to give the baby to a gay couple…will they??

7.gay parents will raise their children to be a gay…influation… 8. gay marriage is not supported by religion. 9.children would not succeed if they do not have a male parent and a female parent. 10.this will change the hva er et essay, foundation of society…i mean this is not what humans are…. now i am in a huge mess, personally this is original essay writing, what i think of gay marriage, and now i have been given my debate topic to be for gay marraige and i don’t even agree to one of the advantages of gay marriage…i have not even lost one debate in my life….all i can do is of the american revolution, more research, if any one you have a strong point for gay marriage pls do tell me… i personall do not support gay marrige….here are a few reasons why. 2.how will this going to benefit the society….instead this will ruin the society. 3.legalizing gay marriage would open the doors to any body getting married, for original essay writing example would you want your dog to get married to crossing honor in laurence river, another dog of the same sex…..how is the dog going to original writing, be benefited?? 4.why is essay, there this change. …its not like divorce is not legal…i mean two people of the same sex can be good friends….how are they going to benefit the world….they can go out and original writing, watch movies or hand out together… 5.this is less meaningful to honor margaret river, the society. 6.there is a need of original essay writing, a family…you cant just adopt children from the orphanage…..one day the orphanage will run out of ap bio, babies, then who will produces more babies or the orphanage would not want to give the baby to a gay couple…will they?? 7.gay parents will raise their children to be a gay…influation…

8. gay marriage is not supported by essay religion. 9.children would not succeed if they do not have a male parent and a female parent. 10.this will change the foundation of society…i mean this is not what humans are…. now i am in a huge mess, personally this is what i think of daughters of the american essay, gay marriage, and original writing, now i have been given my debate topic to writing thesis discussion, be FOR gay marraige and i don’t even agree to writing, one of the advantages of gay marriage…i have not even lost one debate in my life….all i can do is thesis chapter, more research, if any one you have a strong point for gay marriage pls do tell me… Don’t let this important debate die. Everyone who’s posted here has raised some very good points, and they should be preserved for anyone in the future who needs to learn the arguments on both sides. Essay Writing? The best place to do that is at http://www.livingvote.org/. ‘Christians’ appear graceless, judgmental and advanced guestbook 2.3, controlling when they vote to writing, ‘defend marriage’.

The statistics offered by Steeve were an utter joke. Mr Hollis’ rebuttal was very impressive.

Case Essays: Help Cant Do My Essay - Write my Essay • Pay & Get High Quality Paper… - University of Georgia

Dec 19, 2017 Original essay writing,

Custom Essays in Canada: Buy Essay Online - Buy Original Essay at #1 USA Custom Original Essay Writing… - Pennsylvania State University

The 7-Step Business Plan for Writers. As you’ve probably heard, there’s no such thing as “only being a writer” any more, and while many might not want to handle the business side of original essay things, to give ourselves and our books the purification best chance of success, we must. In May 2012, when Becca Puglisi and essay I self-published The Emotion Thesaurus: A Writer’s Guide to Character Expression , we had quite a few challenges. Essay Advanced? Living in different countries, we needed to create a formal partnership, set up businesses, and figure out how revenue would work. We had to learn publishing and take on essay, marketing and promotion. Neither of us had a business or marketing background, so we relied heavily on research and intuition, and did our best to make the book discoverable. (You can read about our initial marketing plan here.) Our unusual book on showing character emotion created buzz among writers, igniting word of mouth.

Suddenly our lives went from busy to crazy as we tried to keep up with the writing thesis chapter burst of attention, writing guest posts, teaching workshops, and providing interviews. Essay Writing? Books sales continued to strengthen, and we sold foreign rights. A few universities listed the crossing essay margaret book as required reading, and original essay publishers began approaching us. Papers On Water? At this point, Becca and I realized how far the book could go, but because we were being pulled in so many different directions, we didn’t know how to best take advantage of these opportunities. The need for a business plan became our No. Original Writing? 1 focus. Fortunately, my husband is a management consultant who creates plans for many of his clients. Daughters Of The American? With his help, we identified three areas that would help us grow in the year ahead: improving our professional image and brand credibility : creating a website, presenting at conferences and hosting workshops providing new product for our audience : writing two new descriptive thesaurus books expanding into the education sector : contacting colleges and universities to spread awareness of our writing resources.

The roadmap we created allowed us to original, avoid distractions and focus on what would help us grow. As we near the research on water end of the year, Becca and I now have a professional website, three writing resource books that have collectively sold nearly 50,000 copies, and original we increased our credibility through speaking engagements, teaching at conferences, and hosting workshops. In the near future we are looking to thesis chapter, create awareness of our books at the collegiate level, rounding out our business plan objectives. Since much of our productivity and growth are a direct result of essay writing forming a business plan (and sticking to it), I want to share steps you can take to create your own. Imagine your year ahead and what you would like to accomplish as a writer. On Water Purification? What will help you reach your goals, whether it’s publication, releasing more books, beefing up your online visibility, or honing your craft? Write down everything that you want to accomplish, and don’t forget smaller goals, as these are necessary steppingstones to achieving larger ones. Also, choose goals that are within your power to make happen. For example, while you might really want representation, “getting an agent” is not necessarily something you can attain yourself; the essay agent decides whom they represent.

However, “researching and querying all suitable agents” is a goal you can set and meet. Read through your list and look for ap bio evolution test bigger themes. Are there several goals that fit into a similar area of original essay focus, like platform building or writing improvement? Grab some highlighters and group these together. Then, choose a name or tag line that summarizes each theme or area of focus. Common themes might include. Social networking improvement (platform building and evolution connection) Education (attending workshops, finding a critique partner, improving one’s craft, studying the original essay writing industry, etc.) Publishing (trying for an agent, working towards a traditional contract or self-publishing) Marketing visibility (researching and writing implementing ads, hiring a publicist, finding one’s audience online, soliciting reviews, etc.) Now that your goals are organized into different focus areas (themes), step back and essay writing look at the big picture.

Based on where you are now, which areas are the highest priority? For example, querying agents (publication related) and honing your writing skills (education related) might both be areas you’d like to focus on, but if your writing still needs work, it will be a waste of honor margaret river time to query agents immediately. Likewise, if you are winning notable contests and trusted critique partners are hard-pressed to see how you can improve, likely you should make getting your work in front of agents and editors a priority. This step involves soul-searching and original essay writing honesty. Writing Discussion? Sometimes desire (wanting to be published right now, for example) can get in original essay the way of what we actually need (to hone our craft further). To be objective, set emotion aside. Ask yourself hard questions about what your career really needs. If it helps, pretend you are advising a writer friend.

If they were in your shoes, what important things would you suggest they work on to get ahead? Step 4: Pick Two or Three Main Goals. Now comes the hard part: choosing which goals to pursue. Which two areas of focus did you mark as being the most critical? These two themes (say “Education” and “Networking”) should be the 2.3 primary focus of your business plan. Pick specific goals that will help you most in these areas. Once you choose a goal, think about the original essay steps you must take to achieve it. For example, if your goal is to ap bio test, “Build a Platform” you might have action items like open a twitter account and build a following , take a class on social networking, and join a group blog . Original Writing? For inspiration, look at the highlighted lists you made.

Chances are you’ll find smaller goals listed there that will help you achieve your larger one. Two primary areas of focus or main goals are good for daughters of the american essay a business plan, but if you have a third area you’d like to tackle, list it as a secondary goal. Do the same exercise as above and list out tasks (action items) that must be carried out to achieve this goal. When making these decisions, think carefully about your time. We all have roles and commitments outside of writing, and these things require a lot of energy. Business goals should be achievable, so don’t take on more than you can handle. Step 5: Set a Timeline for Each Goal. Stick to your plan by setting timelines that fit your schedule. Becca and I chose a seasonal timeline, so we knew which goal to pursue at original essay, which time of the year. This helped us meet completion dates.

If you are unsure how much time a certain task will require, set a deadline with a fallback date. This way you won’t be discouraged if you miss the essay initial deadline, and you’ll have a buffer if needed. Step 6: Bring It Together in a One-Page Plan. A visual helps when it comes to following a business plan. By condensing your plan on essay, one page, it will force you to papers on water purification, be succinct in what must be accomplished to meet each goal. You can use a spreadsheet or table to do this (Excel, Google spreadsheet, a piece of paper, etc) or download this template. Here’s the business plan Becca and I created for original ourselves: When your spreadsheet is filled out, print and display it where you write.

This will remind you of research papers on water purification what you should be doing and help you make good use of your time. Step 7: Commit and Challenge Yourself Daily. Once your plan is complete, stick to it. When new opportunities come up, see if they fit your plan. It’s important to take advantage of potential windfalls, but only if they further your goals and you have the time. Before you print your business plan, type this statement in bold at the bottom: Is what I’m doing or about to do helping me achieve my goals? Before you commit time and energy to essay writing, new projects, challenge yourself with this question to evaluate if it’s worthwhile.

In today’s publishing landscape, writers must become master jugglers, wearing many hats. Whether you’re published or pre-published, having a business plan is one of the smartest things you can do to keep yourself on track, maximize your time, and thesis discussion ensure that you reach your milestones. Angela Ackerman is a writing coach, international speaker, and co-author of the bestselling book, The Emotion Thesaurus: A Writer’s Guide to original, Character Expression , as well as four others, including the newly minted Urban Setting and Rural Setting Thesaurus duo. Revolution? Her books are available in original five languages, are sourced by US universities, and are used by novelists, screenwriters, editors, and psychologists around the world. Angela is also the co-founder of the popular site Writers Helping Writers, as well as One Stop for hva er et essay Writers, an writing, innovative online library built to help writers elevate their storytelling.

106 Comments on The 7-Step Business Plan for Writers This is FANTASTIC and test essay just what I needed to see this morning! Great post and I love your books Angela. Original Essay Writing? They continue to help me hone my craft. Thanks so much, Adrienne. I really hope this plan helps you map out your best path forward. Crossing Essay Honor? Happy writing (and business planning!) […] Angela is at Jane Friedman’s blog, sharing a 7-Step Business Plan for Writers, because in essay this new world of publishing, it is more important than ever for writers to engage in […] Yes, this isn’t meant to take the evolution test essay place of a full scale plan–I wanted to share something that both pre-published and published authors could use as a starting point, especially those who might find the idea of a creating a business plan daunting. Unfortunately writers can no longer “just write,” and so it’s necessary to become more business-minded (even if this isn’t something that comes naturally).

Thanks so much for the comment! You’re welcome #128578; If you ever plan on publishing a blog post about essay expanding this with the financial aspects, let me know and I’d be happy to write a guest post about it (I’ve written more than one complete business plan in my life, both for myself and others). Sounds good–thanks for offering, Saoirse. I will keep this in mind! #128578; You can contact me at saoirse.omara (at) gmail dot com (just realised that my name isn’t clickable lol).

Thanks for discussion sharing ideas for original essay writing a business plan. Papers? I need to save this one! Happy this will help you Linda. #128578; Have a great week! Although I don’t need a business plan right now, I want to thank you for original essay writing The Emotion Thesaurus! I bought if first on Kindle, then realized I’d like to guestbook, have a paper copy, too. Essay? It’s been an research papers on water purification, immense help when my editor says, “More emotion, Eleanor, dig deeper,” a refrain I hear often. So, thanks for helping me mine my own and my characters’ emotions! Eleanor Sullivan, Graven Images, A Singular Village Mystery. I am thrilled that The Emotion Thesaurus is helping you! Writing character emotion is such a struggle, because we want it to feel authentic, but tend to essay, get trapped in reusing the same descriptors to show it.

Hopefully the entries in the book offer you a path to hva er et essay, spark your brain quickly so you can stay in original the flow and write the scene. Essay Guestbook 2.3? Thanks for original essay the comment! Awesome suggestions, Angela! Love the chart! And this is essay advanced guestbook a good time of the year to focus on essay, goals and new beginnings! Sue, it is the perfect time, isn’t it?

Now more than ever, being a writer is about being willing to grow and evolve. The good thing is that there is hva er et essay so much content out there to essay writing, help us find our way. I hope the chart helps you. #128578; Thank you so much Jane for having me here today. I just finished watching your Google hangout with CEA, and can’t wait for the next installment! Thanks so much for the great summary of the shifting writing landscape. Angela, This is an papers on water, well-thought-out and doable plan. Original Essay? I love that you included plans to evolution test essay, get training where needed as well as being open to traditional and self-publishing. Your post made me remember that I have taken many webinars and essay workshops over research on water purification, the years. Before I take another one I need to go back and review all the content on marketing, building a platform, etc. that I’ve already gathered. Thank you.

Very happy to essay, help. As writers, we are in constant development, but if we try to focus on everything, or too much on one thing, then we aren’t making the best use of our time. Sometimes sitting down and looking hard at what we want for crossing essay margaret river ourselves, both long term and original essay short term, is a healthy step to moving forward more productively. #128578; I’m so happy to hear about all your success, Angela. If anyone’s worked hard and deserves it, you do. (And how nice to be married to a business consultant, right?) Thanks for chapter all the original tips. #128578; Haha, Lexa, yes his brain has come in handy, although I appreciate the writing fact that he hasn’t tried to “take over” and only offers help if I ask. His business world and my publishing world have some overlap, but there are also things that work very differently between the two, so I need to understand my world enough to know what advice might work, and what will not. (And thank you–I feel so grateful to have such great supporters like you!) So practical and thoughtful! Makes great sense, and I can implement it immediately. Also use for my ‘other’ passion, genealogy, and my goals there as well! I appreciate the clear language and straightforward style in this post as well.

Yes Celia, this business plan can really be used in any area. even one’s personal development. #128578; I am happy it will be of use to you. Thanks for the visit. Great post, Angela. Essay Writing? I had to research purification, giggle because I wrote on original essay writing, the exact same topic just yesterday on my blog! And we weren’t far off in essay advanced guestbook 2.3 our advice. It’s so important for writers to consider their where they are going with their careers–not just with their books.

They need a good map, and a business plan is just that, with concrete and quantifiable goals broken down into writing, action steps to get them where they want to go. Done correctly, it will help them brand themselves and become successful. And I love your template! Thanks for that. Branding is hva er et essay a big topic. It is probably easier for NF writers than fiction authors to brand themselves.

It grows harder if a person writes in many genres. I know one writer who has 4 pseudonyms plus her own name to cover all the genres she writes in, and so she find it impossible to promote herself. I can see why. Hmmm. This has sparked thoughts for original a blog post. Might just use you as an purification, example, if that’s okay!

Agreed Nina. Writing? After reading this blog I can feel a new post bubbling up. Too bad that I posted yesterday about writer’s critique groups. Writing Thesis Discussion Chapter? Please keep me updated. @ernestosangiacomo:disqus, Since you asked: http://writenonfictionnow.com/4-branding-tips-for-nonfiction-writers-and-authors/. And it does, indeed, feature @angelaackerman:disqus! Read the previous post to find my advice on original essay, business plans for 2.3 writers. I have other posts on business plans for books. Although it’s nonfiction based, I’ll check it out. Is it really necessary to lock oneself into a “Genre Box”?

My unabashed independent spirit refuses to comply. Maybe I’ll create a new genre called Story-Telling through Authorship #128578; Thanks for the post Angela. […] is at Jane Friedman’s blog, sharing the essay writing ins and outs of creating a business plan. This was a hugely important endeavor for us; […] Thanks for the visit Traci! #128578; Okay, now I’ve got some place to start!

Happy to hva er et essay, help you Bish! It might seem daunting, but I think this is an original essay, exercise everyone should sit down and do. Hva Er Et Essay? It is good to look forward and see where we want to be, and it also helps us to evaluate if what we’ve been doing to this point is working the way we need. Have a great week! A great post! I was doing some of this already, but I love the template and how you’ve outlined it so clearly! That’s great Mindy! I find having the “Plan on essay writing, a Page” right on my office wall really helps me stay focused. It’s a constant reminder of essay honor in laurence river what I should be working towards, and as I tick action items off the list, it gives me a greater sense of accomplishment! Great job, Angela! If only we’d had such a succinct explanation of original essay how to research, write a business plan when we were writing ours.

That would’ve been helpful, lol. Thanks for hosting her, Jane! […] Angela Ackerman (Jane Friedman) with The 7-Step Business Plan for Writers […] […] Ackerman’s guest post at Jane Friedman’s site – The 7-Step Business Plan. Read the full post for a quick explanation for each step summarised below: […] […] Angela Ackerman (Jane Friedman) with The 7-Step Business Plan for original Writers […] […] at Jane Friedman‘s blog, Angela Ackerman has written a post, “The 7-Step Business Plan for thesis chapter Writers”, which is doable. It’s a bit like Selznick’s building an original writing, exchange in that […] […] out author Angela Ackerman’s 7-step business plan for ap bio test essay […] post, Angela.

Shared it with my daughter. Original Essay Writing? I chuckled when I saw that. your husband is a business consultant. Writing Thesis Discussion Chapter? Writing has become a new form of. family business in original essay my case too. Hva Er Et Essay? Website design, editing, and marketing.

skills in my family have proved enormously beneficial. Jane, as usual, has attracted another helpful, succinct post that lays groundwork for all of us. Thanks Shirley! And yes, being writers means we do seep into other aspects of original essay family life. The kids always bring me their assignments to read and have actually used the content on crossing essay, my blog to help them write better description (be still my beating heart!). And having a hubby in original essay consulting means a lot of business technique language tends to test, rub off on me.

Win-win! A veritable resource for a beginner. Your seven points forces the creation of a “Big Picture” I was also glad to realize that I was already doing some of those practices. Angela and Becca have not only original essay writing been smart about their business, they’ve been generous. Susan Quinn’s book about indie publishing had great advice about making short term goals, as well as 1 year and 5 year goals. I’d never thought that far ahead when it came to publishing! […] The 7-Step Business Plan for Writers by writing @angelaackerman via @janefriedman […] I truly love this article. Thanks so much for sharing. This will be great for original my blog and daughters of the american revolution essay my writing group.

This is such an excellent, helpful post! It helps me think about all the things I often push away because I don’t know enough–the business part of writing. I’m close to the publishing phase of self-publishing a book and this really lays out the business arc of original essay what I need to think about. The template brings clarity and ap bio evolution essay focus to what can be bewildering and overwhelming to a novice writer. Thank you so much for sharing your process. Really great piece. I need to original essay, get focused about my writing goals and this is a great start. Also, I love a good template. […] via The 7-Step Business Plan for Writers by Angela Ackerman. […] […] Angela Ackerman (via Jane Friedman) with The 7-Step Business Plan for Writers […] The Emotion Thesaurus is hva er et essay a cool, useful book.

[…] need to essay writing, have a plan of action in research papers on water purification place for marketing your book – a Book Promotion Plan. Essay Writing? The competition is fierce on evolution essay, Amazon and […] […] Ackerman on writing, Jane Friedman The 7-Step Business Plan for Writers “Imagine your year ahead and what you would like to daughters of the american revolution, accomplish as a writer. What will help […] […] and I hope you are all well rested, sober, and ready to tackle 2014. Have you created a simple Business Plan For Writers to help you define areas of development and to keep on track when it comes to your […]

Thank you so much for sharing this. Writing? I’m coming late to ap bio test, this post, but it’s very timely for the start of my new year and organizing my writing goals for essay writing the year. I can’t wait to give it a whirl and see where I end up. […] read this excellent article; although not officially part of the above […] Great info and breaking it down step by ap bio evolution test step! Thanks Angela.

[…] Awesome post: The 7-Step Business Plan for Writers […] […] Angela Ackerman (Jane Friedman) with The 7-Step Business Plan for original writing Writers […] […] need to have a plan of action in hva er et essay place – a Book Promotion Plan. Essay? The competition is fierce on Amazon and if your book is not […] […] and I are big fans of career planning and have shared our own business plan at Jane Friedman’s site in hopes of encouraging others to become more structured and […] I just LOVE this, and really appreciate the of the american image of the chart. It saves time rather than having to figure things out from scratch. Seeing what works is writing SO helpful.

Thank you, ladies! Thank you for crossing essay in laurence river sharing. This will be very helpful as I build my business. Hey friends i have a very unique and cool idea for Your. Business.

It helps you to Promote your Business. Make an app for all android and iphones,we. have very unique and interesting app ideas. Writing? This app helps you for booking ,showing. something and writing thesis discussion avail offers to the customers. You can make your app in just 3. steps at very cheap rates. Thanks for sharing this post. It is very descriptive and very useful advice.

This post helps the people to take the proper decision of business. Last week I have taken the original essay service from OGS Capital for taking proper business plan. The service of discussion chapter this company is very high quality and I am very benefitted with its service. […] If we’re not sure what your priorities should be, Angela Ackerman (of Emotion Thesaurus fame) shared this 7-step plan for original writing brainstorming and figuring out writing thesis discussion chapter what matters to essay, us. […] […] Learn how to make your business plan here. […] […] The 7-Step Business Plan for Writers […] […] Get the full story at Jane Friedman. […] Daily edition: Receive emails that include the full text of each new post Weekly digest: Receive a Sunday weekly e-mail digest of new blog posts. I have more than 20 years of essay honor margaret experience in the book and magazine publishing industry, with expertise in digital media and the future of authorship. I speak around the world at events such as BookExpo America, Frankfurt Book Fair, and Digital Book World, and have keynoted writing conferences such as The Muse The Marketplace. Essay Writing? Read more.

I write and publish The Hot Sheet, the essential industry newsletter for authors.

Buy Essay Online From a Trustworthy Writing Service - Write a non-plagiarized essay, Write an original essay,… - New York University (NYU), New York, NY

Dec 19, 2017 Original essay writing,

Writing an Essay? Here Are 10 Effective Tips - The Write Practice - Write a non-plagiarized essay, Write an original essay,… - College of the Holy Cross

6 Resume Rules for 2017 That You May Not Know About. We#8217;re only in the second week of the writing, new year, so this is a great time to talk about resume rules for 2017. This time last year, readers talked about chapter whether or not they apply to jobs when they don#8217;t meet all the requirements (also see our imposter syndrome post), and a few years ago Kat answered a reader email about unusual ways to writing get your resume noticed. Here are six resume rules for 2017 that you may not have heard: 1. Know that the #8220;one page#8221; limit no longer applies. Depending on your career and circumstances, it#8217;s OK if your resume goes beyond a page. To figure out whether to make your resume one, two, or even three pages, check out these guidelines from Monster. Daughters Of The American Revolution? No matter what, though, keep it concise #8212; and make 100% sure there are no typos! 2. Original? Tailor your resume to evolution test each position and company; don#8217;t keep sending every employer exactly the same one. Use the words and original essay writing phrases from the job description in each resume, especially because it#8217;s more likely to be read by a computer first than by a human.

3. Include the URL of your LinkedIn profile and any relevant, employer-friendly social media accounts. (After all, the company is research on water going to google you anyway!) If you have a portfolio website, include that too. By the way, if your LinkedIn URL looks something like this: linkedin.com/in/jane-smith-5cu95802, create a custom URL for your public profile (e.g., linkedin.com/in/janesmith) by updating your public profile settings. Writing? 4. Include a summary or #8220;personal branding statement#8221; rather than an objective, which has fallen out of favor over purification the years. Here are some examples from the web: #8220;corporate troubleshooter regularly assigned to original the most challenging initiatives#8221; (source) #8220;cost-conscious benefits manager who has creatively tailored plans to employee needs at below average employer cost#8221; (source) #8220;online ad sales director with 12 years of daughters of the experience leading sales teams in start-up, rapidly growing, and established companies#8221; (source) 5. Don#8217;t leave college activities on your resume forever. Career experts recommend removing them anywhere from original writing two to five years after graduation. And unless you#8217;re a recent graduate, don#8217;t include your graduation year. Once you#8217;ve past the #8220;young professional#8221; stage, leaving it off may protect you from age discrimination (and motherhood discrimination). (You might ask, #8220;Well, can#8217;t they tell how old I am by looking at my listed positions?#8221; but Alison Green of Ask a Manager recommends removing jobs that you held more than 15-20 years ago.) 6. Save and send/upload your resume as a PDF (rather than a Word document) so that the formatting will look exactly the same to essay honor margaret river the hiring manager as it does to you. Original Essay? Tip: I literally did not learn this until today, so some of ap bio test essay you may not know this either #8212; when you choose #8220;Export#8221; in Word and create a PDF, the formatting will be preserved, including hyperlinks. Original Essay Writing? (A note based on some of the comments #8212; if you KNOW a bot will be looking at writing thesis discussion, your resume, upload a plain .txt version as well as a PDF version for human eyes, if you can.) When is the last time you updated your resume? How long is it?

How much do you alter it for each position you apply for? For those of you who REVIEW resumes, what are your main takeaways? Have you read about any other resume rules for original essay 2017? Getting Past the of the revolution essay, First Cut with a Resume That Grabs Digital Eyes [New York Times] What To Remove From Your Resume In 2017 [Forbes] How Long Can Your Resume Be? [Ask a Manager] 16 Things You Should Remove From Your Resume [The Ladders] Research: How Subtle Class Cues Can Backfire on Your Resume [Harvard Business Review] I would be weary of the PDF rule. I always used to submit resumes as PDFs it just seemed more polished. Essay? But one of my friend who works in HR for a big multi-national company says that they get so many applications for essay advanced 2.3 each job that they all get scanned by automated software for keywords before ever being seen by original writing, a person. And many of those software applications cannot properly search PDFs, even though candidates are told this is an acceptable format. If your application is being submitted to writing thesis chapter what is obviously HR software, I#8217;d think twice and original submit a Word document if it#8217;s a supported format.

They probably can#8217;t search PDFs if they#8217;re a scan of something. Daughters American? But the PDFs you save from Microsoft Word are most definitely searchable. I don#8217;t know how the essay, search function of these software applications work, but apparently a number of them struggle with PDFs. Thesis? Knowing that, why take the risk? They#8217;re only not searchable if they#8217;re scanned. I think it#8217;s riskier to essay send a .doc than to send a searchable, natively created PDF. Here#8217;s an example where spellcheck won#8217;t help you. You meant wary but wrote weary.

Both are words, so spellcheck is going to think you#8217;re fine. Always have a good friend or colleague check your entire resume. I review resumes pretty regularly and ap bio evolution test essay I HATE when someone sends a Word document. Whether fair or not, it makes me feel like the applicant is not very tech-savvy. Even when the essay, format stays as the applicant intended (which it seldom does), I always use the Show/Hide formatting button and can often see that s/he made the resume #8220;look#8221; good but is essay advanced 2.3 not a very adept/efficient Word user.

In fairness, my organization does not use automated software but I haven#8217;t heard of problems with resume scanning software and PDFs as long as OCR is applied. Another big turn-off is people who describe themselves as #8220;detail-oriented#8221; but have an original writing error in ap bio their resume. I am much less forgiving of an error when the applicant has listed #8220;attention to detail#8221; as one of essay their selling points. Similarly, I more apt to forgive a minor error on our online application (unique to us, no spell check, etc.) than I am to crossing essay in laurence margaret overlook an error on your resume or cover letter, which you#8217;ve had time to prep, check and have others review. Is #4 actually a thing people recommend now? I always think it looks a bit cliched and useless, and original as a hiring manager, I wouldn#8217;t even bother to read it. If you have some special skill/relation to the job, tell me in hva er et essay your cover letter or email don#8217;t give me random marketing jargon.

Agree, I would be surprised to original essay writing see this on a resume and papers purification would assume the person is out of touch with current norms. This should be in the cover letter. Original? Keeping it in is a waste of space. I see this a lot so I know it#8217;s done. I#8217;m not in Law, though, so that may be the difference? It doesn#8217;t bother me as long as it#8217;s brief. Even if they use marketing jargon, it still gives me a sense of what the crossing honor in laurence margaret, applicant believes are their top professional or personal traits, which can be telling. It#8217;s like the classic interview question, #8220;describe yourself in three words#8221; (or some iteration of that).

The cover letter, on the other hand, is how their skills and experience will align with my organization and the position. I am really, really against #8220;personal branding statements#8221; on resumes. Original Essay? I don#8217;t need or want that on test your resume. The resume is valuable space and should be devoted to highlighting how the original writing, applicant#8217;s skills and daughters of the american revolution experience match the employer#8217;s need. I would keep graduation year on resumes, but that may be a law-specific thing I need to know when you graduated so I know what kind of original essay level of crossing essay honor in laurence seniority I#8217;m looking at. I#8217;m also really against wasting resume space on #8220;other interests,#8221; but I know lots of original writing people here disagree with me. And I do get that, say, summer associate candidates may not have a ton of stuff to advanced guestbook include on the resume and thus the fluff gives the interviewer something to talk about.

But if you have enough substantive material to fill up a page, please, for the love of god, do not cut any of it so you can include that you enjoy hiking, cooking, and original essay writing SEC football. What would you think of including law school graduation year, but losing college graduation year and grad school graduation year? In my case, I graduated in 2010, but did grad school before law school, so I#8217;m 39. And don#8217;t really want to broadcast that to a prospective employer. But neither do I want to make the employer suspect I#8217;m even older. Honestly, if you graduated in 2010, you#8217;re not applying for entry-level jobs, so why would your age be concerning? I think that age discrimination of the kind you#8217;re worried about advanced guestbook really pops out when you#8217;re looking for that first post-law school job and you#8217;re 10 years older than your classmates I#8217;d be more likely to do what you suggest then. At this point, you#8217;re well into your career so personally I wouldn#8217;t see a significant risk there. Ha- I#8217;ve seen the original essay, personal interests work against applicants. There was one law student who put that their special talent was building a house of cards in essay under a minute (talent changed slightly for privacy).

Several people wanted to hand this person a deck of cards to test them during the interview. Writing? They were also known as the card student when discussed internally. Don#8217;t be that person. But why? It wasn#8217;t an offensive interest. To the contrary, it appeared rather impressive and ap bio memorable to the people.

Yeah, if he can deliver I think that would be epic. Essay Writing? And I would be pleased to be known as #8220;card student.#8221; The #8220;card#8221; applicant goes right along with the applicant who wore the ap bio evolution, really cool/funky/hot thing to the interview. Unless it#8217;s relevant (card-house building prepares me for essay writing a career in cup stacking), metaphorical (building card houses requires a keen sense of balance, as does this position, and each piece must be in place) or network-y (when I was at the card house tournament, I met person X, who you may know), why bring it up? I#8217;m not bringing it up. I#8217;m putting it on american revolution the very bottom of original essay writing my resume as a fun fact to writing thesis discussion reward you for original plowing through the rest of it. Although certainly I am prepared to discuss its relevance to the position if you bring it up. I think it can work for and against#8230; I am off the test, opinion that card building is pretty awesome. The ones I think should be avoided: -Travel#8230; And then listing places. I do not have a lot of work experience however, my volunteer life is original essay where I have gained experience. SO I don#8217;t put my interests (reading, knitting, scrapbooking) but I put my volunteer experience that is writing chapter relevant to the position I am applying for essay writing (for example, I volunteer as an instructor/trainer for girl guides and that gives me experience in public speaking/presenting and evolution test facilitating, things I want to do in a career but do not have the experience in that yet).

I remember the year everyone was fighting to original hire the law student who took a year off school to drive the Weinermobile around the country. Writing? He had the original, best stories. The one that was a subject of hva er et essay debate was the guy who put on his resume that he ran the Boston marathon with a broken foot. Shows determination or stupidity? Don#8217;t think he got an interview. +1 to everything cbackson said. Yeah I agree with all of this. #4 (branding statement) sounds like something Resume Advice People invented to give themselves something to talk about.

No one is (or should be) actually doing this. Also#8230; #3#8230; unless you#8217;re super hard to find on LinkedIn (why, though?) or have a super common name, you don#8217;t need to include a link. I#8217;d frankly rather google it. Agree on original writing keeping the grad year. It honestly looks like you are trying to hide something by leaving it off. I would be wary of a candidate who did. I am also against thesis discussion, putting #8220;interests#8221; on resumes.

It#8217;s not relevant to whether you can do the jobI want to writing know your education, experience, and interest in the actual work. Also, maybe I#8217;m overthinking things, but I think there#8217;s too big of a risk that your interests are boring (hiking, reading, traveling), will be perceived as taking too much time or energy away from ap bio evolution test work (triathlons, writing screenplays), falling into or out of some gender stereotype (sewing, baking, metalworking), or being too idiosyncratic (card guy). There#8217;s a possible exception of essay writing summer associate applicants because it#8217;s expected. But I also think law firms should stop asking. I kind of feel like if you#8217;re a card builder and you#8217;re interviewing with a firm that is writing anti-idisyncratic, then that#8217;s good information and it#8217;s a useful screening device on both sides, no? Just read a REALLY interesting Harvard Business Review article addressing this exact topic. Special interest are actually a way that subtle social class cues are conveyed.

There#8217;s been research conducted specifically in a law firm setting and essay (not shockingly), the writing thesis chapter, male with interests like polo and sailing was 4 times more likely to get a callback. Essay? When asked to give reasons, employers made generalizations about #8220;good fit.#8221; In a frustrating twist, having money as a woman worked against candidates because they were perceived as not needing to work because of family money. That#8217;s not frustrating at all#8230; I#8217;ll post the hva er et essay, link to original essay the article in of the essay my reply. All in all very interesting. And of course now I see that it was linked at writing, the bottom of the post. Daughters Of The American? Silly me! Trying to lateral or possibly go in house (ouch, paycut) after being told I#8217;m out in my #8220;up or out#8221; big firm. 18 big firm apps via recruiter and so far 11 rejections. SIGH/Terrified. I don#8217;t know that I#8217;d waste time or space on the LinkedIn link if people want to see your LinkedIn profile, don#8217;t they just open up Linkedin and search?

I agree too. Original? Plus, my LinkedIn profile had essentially the hva er et essay, same information as my resume (educational background, experience). Essay? Unless your LinkedIn profile reflects something important that you can#8217;t fit on your resume, I#8217;d ask why you bothered to include the honor in laurence river, link. Even then, you should be able to include anything you really want an employer to see in essay your cover letter and resume, especially if you can break the one-page rule. LinkedIn is where the branding statement goes! In 2016 we undertook a time-consuming effort to account for all our income and spending. There are probably tools that would have made this effort easier, but I did it #8220;by hand#8221;: I built a spreadsheet and recorded each month#8217;s income (my salary; husband#8217;s salary; other income) and all expenses (utilities; car expenses; groceries; eating out; travel; discretionary; childcare; etc.).

It is not quite complete yet because I am waiting for the next credit card bills to hva er et essay enter all the end of year expenses. But, it#8217;s provided very interesting, fairly accurate, and generally reassuring data about the choices we are making. I don#8217;t plan to do the original writing, same in 2017 (because it was a lot of effort), but I will continue to track my discretionary spending (which I#8217;ve done for several years) because it really helps me to evolution essay curb my unnecessary purchases. I tend to use Marshalls/TJMaxx as a form of entertainment, but all those $30-70 purchases really add up (and I#8217;m mostly buying little bit of stuff I really don#8217;t need). I#8217;ve been doing this for years. Essay Writing? One of the things I love about it is that the record of my expenses is hva er et essay also the essay, diary of my life: trips, house projects, tuition, weddings (!), and so on. I#8217;ve been tracking my expenses and income by writing thesis, hand using spreadsheets for a few years now, and essay writing if you enter things a couple of times a month it doesn#8217;t take that much time. This is also a good way to keep track of hva er et essay where you are each month WRT your budget for a particular category. I got all excited the other day because I started using if/then formulas to alert myself to categories I#8217;m approaching the limit on or have exceeded. I#8217;ve been doing it for original essay writing the last 7 years with YNAB. It is still eye opening to me to this day.

I think it is an excellent habit to thesis chapter create. Lawyerly ladies I#8217;m currently struggling with how to include this information in my resume: my law school graduation year and firm class year are different. Original? I have a really specialized skill set and worked full time for my current firm while attending law school. On Water? Post-graduation, they offered me a three year bump in seniority to original essay writing stay with them, and hva er et essay within the firm, I operate at that level of seniority (now a senior associate). Writing? I#8217;m basically looking for a way to evolution test essay say #8220;I graduated in original essay writing 20XX, but am compensated as and given the crossing honor in laurence river, responsibility of original writing a 20(XX+3) grad.#8221; In the of the american, scoping sentence under your company/job, I would say a concise version of just that. Thanks for this post and the links, which absolve me from guilt over original essay coming to writing discussion a #8220;fun#8221; site when I have other stuff I should be doing! That Harvard Business Review article #8212; ouch. A resume showing a guy comes from money (sailing, polo) does better than lower-class-looking guys and all women. A resume showing a woman comes from money (sailing, polo) gets the least amount of original writing interest b/c the guestbook 2.3, reviewers assume she#8217;ll quit because she will have a rich husband.

I just finished reading that, too. I guess I should#8217;ve put sailing on original essay writing my resume all these years#8230; Or maybe work #8220;desire to thesis discussion chapter stay single forever#8221; into my mission statement. I enjoyed reading your post. Original Essay Writing? I worked as a career coach for research papers on water a few years and everything you covered here it#8217;s on point!

It is critical to original essay optimize your resume to evolution test essay each position and company culture. There is a free AI resume tool that helps do just that. Super helpful in any job search!

Best Website To Buy Essay Papers Online - Master Paper Writers - Tough Topics: Are Essay Writing Companies Ethical? |… - Winona State University

Dec 19, 2017 Original essay writing,

Write my Paper for Me - Online Custom Papers Writing Service - Original Composition Essay Writing Tips |… - Savannah College of Art and Design Atlanta

Cemex and Antidumping Lorenzo Zambrano was accustomed to original, making toug. Cemex and writing discussion chapter Antidumping Lorenzo Zambrano was accustomed to making toug. Welcome to essay, Homework Nerds. We are the writing number 1 most trusted academic services website. We provide a wide range of academic services all students. We can write your papers, do your labs, presentations and writing final exams. Want to discussion chapter, learn more about the essay list of great services we offer for in laurence margaret, students like you ? Just go to www.HWnerds.com.

Cemex and Antidumping Lorenzo Zambrano was accustomed to making toug. Cemex and Antidumping Lorenzo Zambrano was accustomed to making tough decisions. During his 6-year tenure as chief executive officer of Cementos Mexicanos S.A. (Cemex) he had transformed Cemex from a small Mexican cement manufacturer to an industry superpower. In the fall of 1990 however Zambrano faced perhaps his most difficult challenge. In August the U.S. International Trade Commission ruled that Cemex had unfairly depressed cement prices in the southern and southwestern United States by dumping cement and essay cement clinker. As a result a duty of daughters of the revolution 58 percent was levied on all subsequent Cemex exports from original Mexico into the region.

The ruling threatened Cemexs expansion and hva er et essay its access to the lucrative U.S. market. Original Writing! Cemex needed a strategy to address the threat. Daughters! In early 1989 cement producers in the southern portion of the United States were concerned about the original essay erosion of their domestic market share due to increased imports from Mexico. Imports of gray portland cement and cement clinker two principal cement products had been increasing steadily over the previous 5 years. At the same time the lackluster performance of the economy in the region and in particular the depressed level of new construction was reducing the demand for cement. Historically the cement industry was a very regionalized business with high overland transportation costs preventing the commodity from freely flowing between regional markets. This insulation helped cement producers ride out hard times in the highly cyclical industry. Of The American Revolution! Throughout the 1980s however Mexican producers were able to transport their cement across the border and still remain competitive on price sometimes undercutting domestic producers. The majority of Mexican cement imported into the United States came from one producer Cemex. Writing! U.S. cement companies in the South and Southwest realized that imports from Cemex and other Mexican companies presented a threat to their profitability and perhaps to their survival.

They believed that with high transportation costs Mexican producers must be selling their cement at less than fair value which would constitute dumping under Section 731 of writing discussion chapter U.S. Essay! trade law. Cement producers in Arizona New Mexico Texas and ap bio test essay Florida filed an antidumping petition claiming that Cemex and the Mexican cement industry were dumping cement and clinker in their markets. The Mexican Cement Industry Portland cement was used predominantly in the production of concrete and cement clinker was the primary component in the production of portland cement. Demand for cement was cyclical and followed the original general economic climate demographic trends and evolution essay construction expenditures. In Mexico approximately 60 percent of cement expenditures were in residential construction 20 percent in public works and 20 percent in commercial construction. Original Writing! A principal input to cement production was oil with energy costs accounting for 4050 percent of cement production expenses. Mexican cement firms had benefited from governmental policies. Mexicos vast oil resources allowed it to implement targeted domestic industrial policies and in 1986 the government provided its domestic producers with oil for as little as $4 a barrel compared with a weighted-average world price ranging from $14 to $16 a barrel.27 In 1990 however Mexican oil prices were raised to world levels. The Mexican cement industry was dominated by Cemex which by the early 1990s was the largest cement company in North America and the fourth largest in the world. By the end of 1991 its capacity had grown to 24 million tons which was 63 percent of essay honor in laurence Mexican capacity.

Cemexs primary Mexican competitor was Grupo Cementos Apasco S.A. de C.V. (Apasco) which was 60 percent owned by Holderbank Financire Glarus Ltd. (Holderbank) a Swiss company that was the largest cement company in essay the world.28 Apasco had 17 percent of the Mexican market in 1991. The next largest competitor was Cruz Azul which had 13 percent of the market. Part of Cemexs rapid growth had come through acquisitions. Cemex had spent nearly $1 billion on acquisitions acquiring Cementos Anahuac then Mexicos third-largest cement producer in 1987 and in 1989 acquiring Empresas Tolteca Mexicos second-largest producer and Cemexs chief competitor. Geographic diversification in addition to locating plants close to crossing in laurence river, major markets rationalized production.

Cemex also spent $950 million on original essay writing new plant and environmental control equipment. This made the plants more energy efficient raised labor productivity and added 4.8 million tons of new capacity. Guestbook! Another $330 million was spent to develop international operations including U.S. distribution facilities in Arizona Texas and California. Original! Cemex subsequently acquired for hva er et essay, $1.8 billion the two largest Spanish cement producers giving it a presence in original essay writing the European Union. In 1991 Cemexs sales were approximately $1.7 billion with exports accounting for thesis discussion, 15 percent of the essay total. The combination of its plant modernization and capital expenditure programs and its management and engineering know-how had given Cemex very low costs. Cemex had outstanding plant management practices and had been able to reduce plant downtime substantially which increased its effective capacity and hva er et essay reduced costs. Cemex had high brand loyalty in Mexico. Original Essay! In most countries cement was a commodity purchased primarily by industrial and commercial buyers. In Mexico however about 78 percent of cement sold was through retailers in bags under brand names.

In 1991 Cemexs bagged cement was sold through 4 500 exclusive retail distributors. Cemex provided technical and marketing assistance to crossing essay honor in laurence, its dealers and maintained long-term relationships with them. Cemex had several plants located close to the U.S. border. Cemexs headquarters in original Monterrey was only 130 miles from Texas and the rapid economic growth in Mexico along the U.S. border provided an attractive location for new cement plants. Since cement production involved economies of scale large plants were desirable leaving some capacity for exports to the United States. The U.S. Cement Industry As in Mexico the U.S. industry was highly cyclical depending on the general state of the economy and hva er et essay the construction industry in original particular. Because of high overland transportation costs 95percent of all gray portland cement shipments were made to customers located within 300 miles of the production site.

The U.S. industry was not nearly as concentrated as the Mexican industry. The leading U.S. cement producer in 1990 was Holnam which was owned by Holderbank and hva er et essay had 11.8percent of the domestic market.29 Holnam was followed by Lafarge (6.7 percent) Southdown (6.1 percent) Lone Star Industries (5.5 percent) Ash Grove Cement (4.9 percent) and numerous other companies at original writing least five of which each had a domestic market share of over 3 percent. During the of the revolution 1980s European companies began buying U.S. cement companies and by 1989 60 percent of the U.S. industry was owned by foreign companies. For example Lafarge was owned by Lafarge Coppe of France which was the worlds second largest cement producer. Cement imports accounted for original essay writing, 22 percent of the approximately 90 million tons of annual U.S. cement consumption and imports had somewhat higher shares in the southern tier states. The Portland Cement Association estimated that in 1986 U.S. producers bought and resold approximately two-thirds of the cement imported into the country. The rationale provided by U.S. producers was that import prices were attractive and hva er et essay since cement was a commodity they were forced to serve their customers from the original essay writing lowest-cost source. The U.S. construction industry was weak at the end of the 1980s.

The growth of the U.S. cement market was 1.3 percent in 1989 and 2.9 percent in 1990 whereas the growth rates of the Mexican cement market for the same years were 3.7 percent and 7.3 percent respectively. In the southern and southwestern United States in particular the success of ap bio test essay Mexican cement importers contrasted sharply with the decline of local cement firms. In 1988 Mexican imports accounted for 14 percent of the ArizonaNew MexicoTexas market and 22 percent of the Florida market. In addition since 1983 seven domestic cement plants had closed in the ArizonaNew MexicoTexas region and two had closed in Florida. Domestic firms believed that Mexican firms were dumping cement in the United States by selling their exports at less than fair value (LTFV). The antidumping petitioners included two unions and eight companies which formed the Ad Hoc Committee of AZ-NM-TX-FL Producers of original Gray Portland Cement. The committee was led by Southdown the largest U.S.-owned cement manufacturer. Our investigation to date convinces us that the Mexicans success in U.S. markets is due to dumping and not to any other factor stated Clarence Comer chief executive of Houston-based Southdown and chairman of the committee.30 The petitioners claimed that they had been materially injured by Mexican cement producers. The petition alleged that the dumping of essay cement depressed prices in the United States caused investors to abandon the industry and threatened their markets production and jobs. Comer summarized the original allegation: U.S. Research Papers On Water! cement producers should not have to accept declining returns declining employment and declining capital investment.

We should not have to cede U.S. markets and U.S. jobs to unfairly Cemexs Strategy From the beginning of the process Cemex complied fully with the requests for data. Original! Cemex also opened its operations to the DOC as much as possible to expedite the administrative process and to demonstrate that the company was confident that it would prevail. Cemex assigned the dumping issue top priority and created a new department to oversee the implementation of a multipronged strategy to address the issue. First a U.S. law firm specializing in dumping cases was hired to provide advice. Second Cemex sought to use the hva er et essay media in Mexico to build support and call the attention of the Mexican people to original essay, the alleged unfair treatment.

Cemex also sought coverage from the U.S. media including the Wall Street Journal to educate the American people about Cemex and its overall strategy and performance both in Mexico and in the United States. Third a presentation was made to the Mexican Commerce Department to demonstrate the importance of the petition and the effect it would have on american Cemex and Mexico. Original Essay Writing! The goal was to obtain the Mexican governments support against the U.S. action. The Mexican government however was concerned about possibly jeopardizing the ongoing North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) negotiations and decided not to pressure the U.S. DOC. The opportunity for lobbying in essay guestbook 2.3 Washington was limited because the issue was in the jurisdiction of regulatory rather than legislative institutions. As a result little lobbying was done although certain government leaders (including senators and governors in states where Cemex had operations) were contacted to explain the antidumping petition and Cemexs position. Original! Cemex believed that in ap bio reaching their conclusion that dumping had occurred the U.S. Essay Writing! agencies had ignored Cemexs actual price and american shipping costs.

For example Cemex sold its cement in the United States at market prices but nearly a third of that went to the cost of transporting the original essay cement from its plants south of the border. Zambrano noted that the ITC deducted the transportation costs and thus concluded there was dumping.35 Cemex argued that the crossing honor in laurence margaret antidumping petition was nothing more than an attempt by its competitors to halt its expansion in the United States. Some of our competitors thought we were a rather weak neighbor stated Zambrano. And it just so happens that we grew and they didnt like it.36 The ITC ruling had potentially devastating ramifications for Cemexs expansion drive into the U.S. market and original writing Zambrano implemented an integrated strategy combining both market and nonmarket components. The market component consisted of a revamped short-term business strategy in response to daughters of the american, the duty assessed. The nonmarket component focused on lowering the duty and original essay writing reversing the ruling.

It was designed to seek redress through three institutional arenas: administrative judicial and international. Cemexs Market Strategy37 First Zambrano decided to reduce substantially Cemexs exports to guestbook 2.3, the United States. This was offset to some extent by growth in Cemexs home market which had become much more attractive because Mexico initiated a number of original public works projects that caused demand for cement to grow by about 10 percent. Second the 58 percent duty made shipments unprofitable in states where cement prices were low so Zambrano withdrew completely from some U.S. states and focused only on those with higher prices. Cemex abandoned Florida outright after the ITC ruling and was content with breaking even in the higher-priced markets.

Selling only in regions with high prices had the advantage of advanced guestbook reducing the difference between U.S. and Mexican mill net prices which would result in essay writing a lower dumping margin at the next annual review. Third Cemex maintained a substantial Type II (bulk) cement market in Mexico so that the ITA would compare the product sold in hva er et essay the U.S. market with the essay Mexican Type II (bulk) cement market. Hva Er Et Essay! Cemex wanted to avoid the ITA concluding that the like product was its branded bagged cement in Mexico which would substantially increase the dumping margin. Cemexs Nonmarket Strategy As part of essay writing its nonmarket strategy Cemex requested administrative reviews of the american revolution essay duty and in the first review the petitioners alleged that Cemex had created a fictitious bulk market in its home country to writing, reduce the duties. The ITA found that no fictitious market had been created and ap bio test essay as a result of Cemexs new market strategy of limiting exports to regions with high prices the duty was reduced to 30.74 percent. Zambrano also attempted to have the ITCs ruling reversed in judicial arenas. Cemex appealed the ITC determination of material injury to the U.S. Court of original writing International Trade (CIT) arguing that the essay advanced 2.3 ITC had not followed proper procedures.

The CIT rejected Cemexs argument and Cemex appealed using the same argument to the U.S. Court of Appeals but was also unsuccessful. Cemex also appealed to the CIT the duties imposed by the ITA arguing that the ITA had followed neither statutory requirements nor precedents in determining the dumping margin. The CIT however ruled that the overall weight of precedent was in original favor of the approach used in daughters american revolution essay the Cemex case. Original Essay! The CIT upheld the dumping duty. After failing in the U.S. Crossing Essay Honor Margaret! judicial arenas the Mexican government petitioned the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) requesting that a panel be established to review the antidumping dispute.

In July 1992 the GATT panel found that the United States had improperly imposed duties on the Mexican cement industry and recommended that $30 million in duties already collected be returned. Original! The order to refund duties was rarely made by research purification, GATT so the decision was considered severe. Original Essay! The panel did not address whether the Mexican companies had sold at less than fair value. Rather the panel concluded that the U.S. Department of Commerce had not verified that the ad hoc committee of petitioners that brought the action was sufficiently representative of the industry. The committee represented only 61.7 percent of all U.S. cement producers in the region but under GATT antidumping rules the petitioner in a regional dispute must represent all or almost all of the production in the region. Since all GATT member nations had to adopt the panels recommendation for it to research on water purification, take effect any single member could effectively block action. Concluding that thebasis for the GATT panels determination was contrary to U.S. Essay! law the United States withheld its approval and the duties and discussion findings imposed under U.S. trade law remained in effect. Frustrated by the U.S. rejection of the GATT panels decision Cemex faced four immediate problems.

First the essay antidumping duty remained in essay honor river effect on Cemexs remaining exports to the United States and the U.S. producers were sure to argue at each annual administrative review that the bulk cement market in essay Mexico was fictitious and that bagged rather than bulk cement was the relevant like product. This posed the threat of an even higher duty. Second Cemex had some stranded assets in terminal and daughters american revolution essay distribution facilities in essay the United States. On Water Purification! Third the reduction in exports to the United States left Cemex with excess capacity in Mexico. Fortunately domestic demand for original essay writing, cement had grown somewhat. Fourth Cemex had to decide what to do about the U.S. market. Writing Discussion! U.S. demand continued to exceed domestic capacity creating a demand for original, imports. Cemex could import cement from advanced Spain but this left the risk of another antidumping petition. Cemex could also directly invest in the United States by writing, building new plants. This would meet some of the shortfall in domestic supply but would reduce the need for imports and Cemex continued to want to export to the United States. Cemex could also attempt to purchase existing capacity from a U.S. producer.

This would be advantageous if Cemex were confident that it could operate the plants more efficiently than the ap bio seller. Essay! Purchasing capacity would not reduce the demand for imports leaving export opportunities if the antidumping problem could somehow be resolved. Preparation Questions 1. Why might the price of cement be higher in Mexico than in the United States? 2. Is the dumping of ap bio evolution test essay cement likely to be harmful to the U.S. economy? 3. What was the motivation of the U.S. Original Essay! producers in filing the antidumping petition? Is this protectionism? 4. Evaluate Cemexs strategy for addressing the antidumping ruling.

How well were its market and nonmarket components integrated? 5. After the hva er et essay United States withheld its approval of the GATT decision what should Cemex do about the original four problems? Cemex and Antidumping Lorenzo Zambrano was accustomed to making toug. Welcome to Homework Nerds Order Page. We are the number 1 most trusted academic services website. Hva Er Et Essay! We provide a wide range of academic services all students. We can write your papers, do your presentations, discussion questions, labs, and final exams. Placing an essay, order is very easy, you can place your order using the form below in 2 minuets only. Simply follow the 4 easy steps in the form to submit your order.

How to order? it is simple! just go to the ORDER PAGE . and follow the 4 easy steps to submit your order. Cemex and Antidumping Lorenzo Zambrano was accustomed to making toug. Cemex and crossing honor in laurence Antidumping Lorenzo Zambrano was accustomed to making tough decisions. During his 6-year tenure as chief executive officer of Cementos Mexicanos S.A. (Cemex) he had transformed Cemex from original essay writing a small Mexican cement manufacturer to guestbook, an industry superpower. In the fall of 1990 however Zambrano faced perhaps his most difficult challenge. In August the U.S.

International Trade Commission ruled that Cemex had unfairly depressed cement prices in the southern and southwestern United States by dumping cement and cement clinker. As a result a duty of 58 percent was levied on all subsequent Cemex exports from Mexico into the region. The ruling threatened Cemexs expansion and its access to the lucrative U.S. market. Cemex needed a strategy to address the original essay writing threat. In early 1989 cement producers in the southern portion of the thesis discussion chapter United States were concerned about the erosion of original writing their domestic market share due to increased imports from Mexico. Imports of gray portland cement and cement clinker two principal cement products had been increasing steadily over the previous 5 years.

At the same time the test lackluster performance of the economy in the region and in particular the depressed level of new construction was reducing the demand for original essay, cement. Historically the cement industry was a very regionalized business with high overland transportation costs preventing the commodity from freely flowing between regional markets. This insulation helped cement producers ride out hard times in the highly cyclical industry. Throughout the 1980s however Mexican producers were able to transport their cement across the border and still remain competitive on price sometimes undercutting domestic producers. The majority of essay guestbook Mexican cement imported into the United States came from one producer Cemex. Essay! U.S. cement companies in the South and Southwest realized that imports from Cemex and other Mexican companies presented a threat to their profitability and perhaps to hva er et essay, their survival. They believed that with high transportation costs Mexican producers must be selling their cement at less than fair value which would constitute dumping under Section 731 of U.S. trade law. Writing! Cement producers in Arizona New Mexico Texas and Florida filed an writing, antidumping petition claiming that Cemex and the Mexican cement industry were dumping cement and clinker in essay their markets. The Mexican Cement Industry Portland cement was used predominantly in the production of concrete and cement clinker was the primary component in the production of essay guestbook portland cement. Demand for cement was cyclical and followed the general economic climate demographic trends and construction expenditures.

In Mexico approximately 60 percent of original essay writing cement expenditures were in residential construction 20 percent in public works and 20 percent in commercial construction. A principal input to cement production was oil with energy costs accounting for 4050 percent of discussion chapter cement production expenses. Essay Writing! Mexican cement firms had benefited from governmental policies. Mexicos vast oil resources allowed it to implement targeted domestic industrial policies and in 1986 the government provided its domestic producers with oil for as little as $4 a barrel compared with a weighted-average world price ranging from $14 to $16 a barrel.27 In 1990 however Mexican oil prices were raised to world levels. The Mexican cement industry was dominated by Cemex which by the early 1990s was the largest cement company in North America and the fourth largest in the world. By the end of 1991 its capacity had grown to 24 million tons which was 63 percent of Mexican capacity. Cemexs primary Mexican competitor was Grupo Cementos Apasco S.A. de C.V. (Apasco) which was 60 percent owned by Holderbank Financire Glarus Ltd. (Holderbank) a Swiss company that was the largest cement company in the world.28 Apasco had 17 percent of the Mexican market in 1991. Ap Bio Evolution! The next largest competitor was Cruz Azul which had 13 percent of the market. Part of Cemexs rapid growth had come through acquisitions. Cemex had spent nearly $1 billion on acquisitions acquiring Cementos Anahuac then Mexicos third-largest cement producer in 1987 and in 1989 acquiring Empresas Tolteca Mexicos second-largest producer and Cemexs chief competitor. Geographic diversification in addition to locating plants close to major markets rationalized production.

Cemex also spent $950 million on new plant and environmental control equipment. Original Essay Writing! This made the plants more energy efficient raised labor productivity and ap bio test added 4.8 million tons of new capacity. Another $330 million was spent to develop international operations including U.S. distribution facilities in Arizona Texas and California. Original Essay! Cemex subsequently acquired for $1.8 billion the two largest Spanish cement producers giving it a presence in the European Union. In 1991 Cemexs sales were approximately $1.7 billion with exports accounting for 15 percent of the total. The combination of its plant modernization and capital expenditure programs and its management and engineering know-how had given Cemex very low costs. Cemex had outstanding plant management practices and ap bio test had been able to reduce plant downtime substantially which increased its effective capacity and reduced costs. Cemex had high brand loyalty in original essay writing Mexico.

In most countries cement was a commodity purchased primarily by industrial and commercial buyers. In Mexico however about crossing, 78 percent of cement sold was through retailers in original writing bags under brand names. In 1991 Cemexs bagged cement was sold through 4 500 exclusive retail distributors. Cemex provided technical and marketing assistance to its dealers and maintained long-term relationships with them. Cemex had several plants located close to the U.S. border. Cemexs headquarters in Monterrey was only 130 miles from Texas and ap bio test essay the rapid economic growth in Mexico along the U.S. border provided an attractive location for new cement plants. Since cement production involved economies of scale large plants were desirable leaving some capacity for exports to the United States. The U.S.

Cement Industry As in Mexico the U.S. industry was highly cyclical depending on the general state of the economy and the construction industry in particular. Because of high overland transportation costs 95percent of original all gray portland cement shipments were made to crossing essay in laurence margaret river, customers located within 300 miles of the original production site. The U.S. industry was not nearly as concentrated as the Mexican industry. The leading U.S. Honor In Laurence River! cement producer in 1990 was Holnam which was owned by Holderbank and had 11.8percent of the domestic market.29 Holnam was followed by Lafarge (6.7 percent) Southdown (6.1 percent) Lone Star Industries (5.5 percent) Ash Grove Cement (4.9 percent) and numerous other companies at least five of which each had a domestic market share of over 3 percent. During the 1980s European companies began buying U.S. cement companies and by 1989 60 percent of the original writing U.S. industry was owned by foreign companies. For example Lafarge was owned by Lafarge Coppe of France which was the worlds second largest cement producer.

Cement imports accounted for 22 percent of the approximately 90 million tons of annual U.S. cement consumption and imports had somewhat higher shares in the southern tier states. The Portland Cement Association estimated that in 1986 U.S. producers bought and resold approximately two-thirds of the cement imported into the country. The rationale provided by U.S. producers was that import prices were attractive and since cement was a commodity they were forced to serve their customers from the lowest-cost source. The U.S. construction industry was weak at the end of the 1980s. The growth of the U.S. cement market was 1.3 percent in 1989 and 2.9 percent in 1990 whereas the growth rates of the Mexican cement market for crossing essay honor, the same years were 3.7 percent and 7.3 percent respectively. In the southern and southwestern United States in particular the success of Mexican cement importers contrasted sharply with the decline of local cement firms. Original Essay! In 1988 Mexican imports accounted for 14 percent of the ArizonaNew MexicoTexas market and daughters of the 22 percent of the Florida market. In addition since 1983 seven domestic cement plants had closed in the ArizonaNew MexicoTexas region and two had closed in original essay writing Florida.

Domestic firms believed that Mexican firms were dumping cement in the United States by advanced 2.3, selling their exports at less than fair value (LTFV). The antidumping petitioners included two unions and original essay eight companies which formed the Ad Hoc Committee of AZ-NM-TX-FL Producers of Gray Portland Cement. The committee was led by Southdown the ap bio evolution test essay largest U.S.-owned cement manufacturer. Original Essay! Our investigation to date convinces us that the Mexicans success in thesis discussion chapter U.S. markets is writing, due to writing thesis discussion chapter, dumping and not to any other factor stated Clarence Comer chief executive of Houston-based Southdown and chairman of the essay committee.30 The petitioners claimed that they had been materially injured by Mexican cement producers. The petition alleged that the dumping of cement depressed prices in the United States caused investors to abandon the industry and threatened their markets production and jobs. Comer summarized the papers on water purification allegation: U.S. Essay Writing! cement producers should not have to accept declining returns declining employment and declining capital investment.

We should not have to cede U.S. Ap Bio Evolution Essay! markets and U.S. jobs to original writing, unfairly Cemexs Strategy From the beginning of the writing thesis discussion process Cemex complied fully with the requests for data. Cemex also opened its operations to the DOC as much as possible to expedite the administrative process and to demonstrate that the company was confident that it would prevail. Cemex assigned the dumping issue top priority and created a new department to oversee the implementation of a multipronged strategy to address the writing issue. First a U.S. law firm specializing in dumping cases was hired to essay advanced 2.3, provide advice. Second Cemex sought to use the media in Mexico to original essay, build support and call the attention of the Mexican people to the alleged unfair treatment. Cemex also sought coverage from the U.S. media including the Wall Street Journal to educate the American people about Cemex and research papers on water its overall strategy and performance both in original Mexico and in ap bio evolution the United States. Third a presentation was made to the Mexican Commerce Department to demonstrate the importance of the petition and the effect it would have on Cemex and Mexico. The goal was to obtain the Mexican governments support against the U.S. action. The Mexican government however was concerned about possibly jeopardizing the ongoing North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) negotiations and decided not to original writing, pressure the U.S. DOC.

The opportunity for lobbying in Washington was limited because the issue was in essay the jurisdiction of regulatory rather than legislative institutions. Original Writing! As a result little lobbying was done although certain government leaders (including senators and governors in states where Cemex had operations) were contacted to explain the antidumping petition and Cemexs position. Essay In Laurence Margaret River! Cemex believed that in essay reaching their conclusion that dumping had occurred the U.S. agencies had ignored Cemexs actual price and shipping costs. For example Cemex sold its cement in the United States at market prices but nearly a third of that went to the cost of transporting the cement from its plants south of the border. Zambrano noted that the ITC deducted the transportation costs and thus concluded there was dumping.35 Cemex argued that the hva er et essay antidumping petition was nothing more than an attempt by its competitors to halt its expansion in the United States. Some of our competitors thought we were a rather weak neighbor stated Zambrano. And it just so happens that we grew and original they didnt like it.36 The ITC ruling had potentially devastating ramifications for Cemexs expansion drive into the U.S. market and Zambrano implemented an integrated strategy combining both market and nonmarket components. The market component consisted of a revamped short-term business strategy in response to the duty assessed. The nonmarket component focused on discussion chapter lowering the duty and reversing the ruling.

It was designed to seek redress through three institutional arenas: administrative judicial and essay writing international. Cemexs Market Strategy37 First Zambrano decided to thesis discussion chapter, reduce substantially Cemexs exports to the United States. This was offset to some extent by growth in Cemexs home market which had become much more attractive because Mexico initiated a number of public works projects that caused demand for cement to grow by about 10 percent. Second the 58 percent duty made shipments unprofitable in states where cement prices were low so Zambrano withdrew completely from some U.S. states and original focused only on those with higher prices. Cemex abandoned Florida outright after the ITC ruling and was content with breaking even in the higher-priced markets. Selling only in regions with high prices had the research advantage of reducing the difference between U.S. and Mexican mill net prices which would result in a lower dumping margin at the next annual review. Third Cemex maintained a substantial Type II (bulk) cement market in essay writing Mexico so that the ITA would compare the product sold in the U.S. market with the Mexican Type II (bulk) cement market.

Cemex wanted to avoid the ITA concluding that the ap bio like product was its branded bagged cement in original essay writing Mexico which would substantially increase the dumping margin. Cemexs Nonmarket Strategy As part of on water purification its nonmarket strategy Cemex requested administrative reviews of the duty and in the first review the petitioners alleged that Cemex had created a fictitious bulk market in its home country to reduce the duties. The ITA found that no fictitious market had been created and writing as a result of Cemexs new market strategy of american revolution essay limiting exports to original essay writing, regions with high prices the duty was reduced to 30.74 percent. Zambrano also attempted to have the ITCs ruling reversed in judicial arenas. Cemex appealed the ITC determination of material injury to the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT) arguing that the ITC had not followed proper procedures. Of The American Revolution Essay! The CIT rejected Cemexs argument and Cemex appealed using the same argument to the U.S.

Court of Appeals but was also unsuccessful. Cemex also appealed to the CIT the duties imposed by the ITA arguing that the ITA had followed neither statutory requirements nor precedents in determining the dumping margin. The CIT however ruled that the overall weight of essay writing precedent was in favor of the approach used in the Cemex case. Essay Margaret! The CIT upheld the dumping duty. After failing in the U.S. judicial arenas the Mexican government petitioned the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) requesting that a panel be established to review the antidumping dispute. In July 1992 the GATT panel found that the United States had improperly imposed duties on the Mexican cement industry and recommended that $30 million in duties already collected be returned. The order to refund duties was rarely made by GATT so the decision was considered severe. The panel did not address whether the Mexican companies had sold at less than fair value.

Rather the panel concluded that the U.S. Writing! Department of Commerce had not verified that the ad hoc committee of petitioners that brought the action was sufficiently representative of the industry. The committee represented only 61.7 percent of all U.S. cement producers in discussion the region but under GATT antidumping rules the petitioner in essay writing a regional dispute must represent all or almost all of the production in the region. Since all GATT member nations had to advanced guestbook, adopt the panels recommendation for it to take effect any single member could effectively block action. Concluding that thebasis for the GATT panels determination was contrary to U.S. law the United States withheld its approval and essay the duties and findings imposed under U.S. trade law remained in effect. Frustrated by the U.S. rejection of the GATT panels decision Cemex faced four immediate problems. First the antidumping duty remained in effect on Cemexs remaining exports to the United States and the U.S. producers were sure to argue at each annual administrative review that the bulk cement market in crossing honor in laurence river Mexico was fictitious and that bagged rather than bulk cement was the relevant like product. Original! This posed the threat of an papers, even higher duty. Second Cemex had some stranded assets in terminal and distribution facilities in the United States.

Third the reduction in exports to the United States left Cemex with excess capacity in Mexico. Fortunately domestic demand for cement had grown somewhat. Fourth Cemex had to decide what to do about the original writing U.S. market. American Revolution Essay! U.S. demand continued to exceed domestic capacity creating a demand for essay, imports. Cemex could import cement from Spain but this left the ap bio evolution test risk of another antidumping petition. Cemex could also directly invest in the United States by building new plants. This would meet some of the shortfall in domestic supply but would reduce the need for imports and original essay Cemex continued to want to export to the United States. Cemex could also attempt to purchase existing capacity from a U.S. producer.

This would be advantageous if Cemex were confident that it could operate the plants more efficiently than the seller. Purchasing capacity would not reduce the demand for imports leaving export opportunities if the antidumping problem could somehow be resolved. Hva Er Et Essay! Preparation Questions 1. Why might the price of cement be higher in Mexico than in the United States? 2. Is the dumping of cement likely to be harmful to the U.S. Original Essay Writing! economy? 3. What was the motivation of the U.S. producers in essay honor in laurence margaret filing the antidumping petition? Is this protectionism?

4. Evaluate Cemexs strategy for addressing the antidumping ruling. How well were its market and nonmarket components integrated? 5. After the United States withheld its approval of the GATT decision what should Cemex do about the four problems? Welcome to Homework Nerds. We are the number 1 most trusted academic services website. We provide a wide range of academic services all students. Original! We can write your papers, do your labs, presentations and final exams. Want to learn more about the hva er et essay list of great services we offer for students like you ? Just go to www.HWnerds.com.

Cemex and Antidumping Lorenzo Zambrano was accustomed to making toug. Diagnosing an Issue in Need of Organizational Change HRM 310 Week 1.

Order Custom Essay Online - Write My Essay for Me Services by… - University of Pittsburgh

Dec 19, 2017 Original essay writing,

Custom Essay Order - Write my Essay • Pay & Get High Quality Paper… - University of Washington, Seattle, WA

Chapter 1. How to essay writing Write a Research Paper. What is a research paper? A research paper is advanced, a piece of academic writing based on essay its author’s original research on a particular topic, and the analysis and interpretation of the research findings. It can be either a term paper, a master’s thesis or a doctoral dissertation. Of The American Essay! This Chapter outlines the logical steps to writing a good research paper.

To achieve supreme excellence or perfection in anything you do, you need more than just the knowledge. Original Essay! Like the Olympic athlete aiming for the gold medal, you must have a positive attitude and daughters of the, the belief that you have the ability to original achieve it. That is the real start to writing an A+ research paper. STEP 1. HOW TO START A RESEARCH PAPER? CHOOSE A TOPIC. Choose a topic which interests and challenges you. Your attitude towards the topic may well determine the ap bio essay amount of effort and original writing, enthusiasm you put into essay in laurence margaret river your research. Focus on a limited aspect, e.g. Original Essay Writing! narrow it down from “Religion” to “World Religion” to “Buddhism”. Obtain teacher approval for your topic before embarking on a full-scale research. Crossing Honor In Laurence Margaret River! If you are uncertain as to what is expected of you in completing the assignment or project, re-read your assignment sheet carefully or ASK your teacher.

Select a subject you can manage. Original Essay Writing! Avoid subjects that are too technical, learned, or specialized. Avoid topics that have only a very narrow range of source materials. For general or background information, check out useful URLs, general information online, almanacs or encyclopedias online such as Britannica. Use search engines and other search tools as a starting point. Pay attention to domain name extensions, e.g., .edu (educational institution), .gov (government), or .org (non-profit organization). These sites represent institutions and tend to be more reliable, but be watchful of possible political bias in discussion chapter some government sites.

Be selective of .com (commercial) sites. Many .com sites are excellent; however, a large number of them contain advertisements for products and nothing else. Network Solutions provides a link where you can find out what some of the original other extensions stand for. Be wary of the millions of personal home pages on the Net. The quality of these personal homepages vary greatly. Learning how to evaluate websites critically and to daughters of the american essay search effectively on the Internet can help you eliminate irrelevant sites and waste less of your time. The recent arrival of a variety of domain name extensions such as .biz (commercial businesses), .pro, .info (info on products / organizations), .name, .ws (WebSite), .cc (Cocos Island) or .sh (St. Helena) or .tv (Tuvalu) may create some confusion as you would not be able to tell whether a .cc or .sh or .tv site is in reality a .com, a .edu, a .gov, a .net, or a .org site. Many of the new extensions have no registration restrictions and are available to anyone who wishes to essay register a distinct domain name that has not already been taken. For instance, if Books.com is unavailable, you can register as Books.ws or Books.info via a service agent such as Register.com.

To find books in daughters of the revolution essay the Library use the OPAC (Online Public Access Catalog). Check out other print materials available in the Library: Almanacs, Atlases, AV Catalogs Encyclopedias and Dictionaries. • Government Publications, Guides, Reports. • Yellow Pages, Zip or Postal Code and Telephone Directories. Check out online resources, Web based information services, or special resource materials on CDs: Online reference materials (including databases, e.g. Original Essay! SIRS, ProQuest, eLibrary, etc.) Google Scholar Wall Street Executive Library Index to Periodicals and Newspapers (e.g. Ap Bio! MagPortal.com, OnlineNewspapers.com, etc.) Answers.com – an original writing online dictionary and encyclopedia all-in-one resource that you can install on your computer free of test, charge and writing, find one-click answers quickly.

Encyclopedias (e.g.Britannica, Canadian Encyclopedia, etc.) Magazines and Journals Newspapers International Public Library Subject Specific software (e.g. Daughters Revolution Essay! discovering authors, exploring Shakespeare, etc.) Check out original essay public and university libraries, businesses, government agencies, as well as contact knowledgeable people in your community. Read and evaluate. Bookmark your favorite Internet sites. Crossing Essay Honor! Printout, photocopy, and take notes of relevant information. As you gather your resources, jot down full bibliographical information (author, title, place of publication, publisher, date of publication, page numbers, URLs, creation or modification dates on Web pages, and your date of access) on your work sheet, printout, or enter the information on essay writing your laptop or desktop computer for advanced guestbook 2.3 later retrieval. Original Writing! If printing from the Internet, it is wise to set up the browser to print the crossing honor river URL and original, date of access for every page. Remember that an article without bibliographical information is useless since you cannot cite its source. STEP 3. MAKE YOUR THESIS STATEMENT. Most research papers normally require a thesis statement.

If you are not sure, ask your teacher whether your paper requires it. A thesis statement is ap bio essay, a main idea, a central point of your research paper. The arguments you provide in writing your paper should be based on this cenral idea, that is why it is ap bio test essay, so important. Do some critical thinking and write your thesis statement down in one sentence. Your research paper thesis statement is original essay writing, like a declaration of your belief. The main portion of ap bio, your essay will consist of arguments to support and defend this belief.

A thesis statement should be provided early in your paper – in the introduction part, or in original writing the second paragraph, if your paper is advanced, longer. It is original essay, impossible to create a thesis statement immediately when you have just started fulfilling your assignment. Advanced 2.3! Before you write a thesis statement, you should collect, organize and analyze materials and your ideas. You cannot make a finally formulated statement before you have completed your reseach paper. Essay! It will naturally change while you develop your ideas. Stay away from writing thesis chapter generic and too fuzzy statements and arguments.

Use a particular subject. The paper should present something new to the audience to make it interesting and educative to read. Avoid citing other authors in this section. Present your own ideas in your own words instead of simply copying from essay writing other writers. A thesis statement should do the following: Explain the readers how you interpret the subject of the evolution test research Tell the readers what to essay writing expect from your paper Answer the question you were asked Present your claim which other people may want to research papers on water dispute. Make sure your thesis is strong. If you have time and opportunity, show it to your instructor to revise. Otherwise, you may estimate it yourself. Does my statement answer the original essay writing question of my assignment? Can my position be disputed or opposed?

If not, maybe you have just provided a summary instead of creating an argument. Research On Water Purification! Is my statement precise enough? It should not be too general and vague. Does it pass a so-called “so what” test? Does it provide new/interesting information to your audience or does it simply state a generic fact? Does the body of my manuscript support my thesis, or are they different things? Compare them and change if necessary.

Remember that changing elements of original essay, your work in the process of writing and reviewing is normal. A well-prepared thesis means well-shaped ideas. It increases credibility of the of the paper and makes good impression about its author. STEP 4. MAKE A RESEARCH PAPER OUTLINE. A research paper basically has the essay writing following structure:

Title Page (including the title, the essay author’s name, the name of a University or colledge, and the publication date) Abstract (brief summary of the paper – 250 words or less) Introduction (background information on the topic or a brief comment leading into the subject matter – up to 2 pages) Manuscript Body, which can be broken down in further sections, depending on the nature of research: Materials and Methods Results (what are the results obtained) Discussion and Conclusion etc. 6. Tables, figures, and appendix (optional) An outline might be formal or informal. An informal outline (working outline) is a tool helping an original writing author put down and essay honor in laurence margaret river, organize their ideas. It is subject to revision, addition and canceling, without paying much attention to form. It helps an author to make his key points clear for him/her and arrange them. Sometimes the students are asked to submit formal outlines with their research papers. In a formal outline, numbers and letters are used to arrange topics and subtopics.

The letters and essay writing, numbers of the same kind should be placed directly under one another. The topics denoted by in laurence margaret river their headings and subheadings should be grouped in a logical order. All points of a research paper outline must relate to the same major topic that you first mentioned in your capital Roman numeral. Example of an essay outline: The purpose of an outline is to help you think through your topic carefully and hva er et essay, organize it logically before you start writing.

A good outline is the most important step in writing a good paper. Check your outline to make sure that the points covered flow logically from one to the other. Include in your outline an INTRODUCTION, a BODY, and a CONCLUSION. Make the first outline tentative. INTRODUCTION – State your thesis and the purpose of your research paper clearly.

What is the chief reason you are writing the paper? State also how you plan to approach your topic. Is this a factual report, a book review, a comparison, or an analysis of a problem? Explain briefly the major points you plan to cover in your paper and why readers should be interested in your topic. BODY – This is essay, where you present your arguments to support your thesis statement. Remember the Rule of 3 , i.e. Ap Bio Test Essay! find 3 supporting arguments for original essay writing each position you take. Begin with a strong argument, then use a stronger one, and end with the strongest argument for your final point. CONCLUSION – Restate or reword your thesis. Summarize your arguments. Explain why you have come to this particular conclusion.

Organize all the information you have gathered according to your outline. Critically analyze your research data. Using the thesis best available sources, check for accuracy and verify that the information is factual, up-to-date, and correct. Opposing views should also be noted if they help to support your thesis. Original Essay! This is the most important stage in writing a research paper. Here you will analyze, synthesize, sort, and digest the information you have gathered and hopefully learn something about guestbook, your topic which is the real purpose of doing a research paper in the first place. You must also be able to effectively communicate your thoughts, ideas, insights, and research findings to original others through written words as in a report, an writing thesis discussion essay, a research or term paper, or through spoken words as in an oral or multimedia presentation with audio-visual aids. Do not include any information that is essay writing, not relevant to your topic, and do not include information that you do not understand. Make sure the crossing honor river information that you have noted is carefully recorded and in your own words, if possible. Plagiarism is definitely out of the question. Document all ideas borrowed or quotes used very accurately.

As you organize your notes, jot down detailed bibliographical information for original each cited paragraph and thesis, have it ready to transfer to your Works Cited page. Devise your own method to organize your notes. Original Essay Writing! One method may be to mark with a different color ink or use a hi-liter to identify sections in your outline, e.g., IA3b – meaning that the item “Accessing WWW” belongs in ap bio evolution essay the following location of your outline: Group your notes following the outline codes you have assigned to your notes, e.g., IA2, IA3, IA4, etc. This method will enable you to quickly put all your resources in the right place as you organize your notes according to your outline. Start with the first topic in original your outline.

Read all the relevant notes you have gathered that have been marked, e.g. with the capital Roman numeral I. Summarize, paraphrase or quote directly for crossing honor in laurence margaret each idea you plan to use in original your essay. Use a technique that suits you, e.g. write summaries, paraphrases or quotations on advanced guestbook note cards, or separate sheets of lined paper. Mark each card or sheet of paper clearly with your outline code or reference, e.g., IB2a or IIC, etc. Put all your note cards or paper in original writing the order of your outline, e.g.

IA, IB, IC. If using a word processor, create meaningful filenames that match your outline codes for river easy cut and paste as you type up your final paper, e.g. cut first Introduction paragraph and paste it to IA. Before you know it, you have a well organized term paper completed exactly as outlined. If it is helpful to essay writing you, use a symbol such as “#” to mark the spot where you would like to check back later to edit a paragraph. The unusual symbol will make it easy for you to find the exact location again.

Delete the symbol once editing is completed. STEP 7. REVISE YOUR OUTLINE AND DRAFT. Read your paper for any content errors. Essay Advanced! Double check the facts and figures. Arrange and rearrange ideas to follow your outline. Original Writing! Reorganize your outline if necessary, but always keep the purpose of honor in laurence margaret, your paper and your readers in original essay writing mind.

Use a free grammar and proof reading checker such as Grammarly. 1. Is my thesis statement concise and clear? 2. On Water Purification! Did I follow my outline? Did I miss anything? 3. Are my arguments presented in a logical sequence? 4. Are all sources properly cited to ensure that I am not plagiarizing? 5. Original Essay! Have I proved my thesis with strong supporting arguments? 6. Have I made my intentions and points clear in the essay?

Re-read your paper for grammatical errors. Use a dictionary or a thesaurus as needed. Do a spell check. Correct all errors that you can spot and improve the writing discussion overall quality of the paper to the best of your ability. Get someone else to read it over. Sometimes a second pair of eyes can see mistakes that you missed. 1. Did I begin each paragraph with a proper topic sentence? 2. Have I supported my arguments with documented proof or examples?

3. Essay Writing! Any run-on or unfinished sentences? 4. Any unnecessary or repetitious words? 5. Varying lengths of sentences? 6. Hva Er Et Essay! Does one paragraph or idea flow smoothly into the next? 7. Original Essay Writing! Any spelling or grammatical errors? 8. Quotes accurate in source, spelling, and writing thesis discussion chapter, punctuation? 9. Original Essay! Are all my citations accurate and in correct format? 10. Did I avoid using contractions? Use “cannot” instead of “can’t”, “do not” instead of “don’t”?

11. Did I use third person as much as possible? Avoid using phrases such as “I think”, “I guess”, “I suppose” 12. Have I made my points clear and interesting but remained objective? 13. Did I leave a sense of completion for my reader(s) at the end of the paper? For an excellent source on English composition, check out this classic book by William Strunk, Jr. on the Elements of Style. Contents include: Elementary Rules of Usage, Elementary Principles of Composition, Words Expressions Commonly Misused, An Approach to Style with a List of Reminders: Place yourself in the background, Revise and rewrite, Avoid fancy words, Be clear, Do not inject opinion, Do not take shortcuts at the cost of research, clarity, … and much more.

Details of The Elements of Style by William Strunk, Jr. partially available online at Bartleby.com. Note: William Strunk, Jr. (1869–1946). The Elements of Style was first published in writing 1918. There is also a particular formatting style you must follow. American! It depends on the field of your studies or the requirements of your University/supervisor. There are several formatting styles typically used. The most commonly used are the APA style and original essay writing, the MLA style. Daughters Revolution Essay! However, there are such style guides as the Chicago Manual of Style, American Medical Association (AMA) Style, and more. APA (American Psychological Association) style is mostly used to original cite sources within the field of social sciences. Writing Discussion! The detailed information can be found in essay writing Publication Manual of the essay advanced guestbook American Psychological Association , (6 th ed., 2 nd printing).

MLA (Modern Language Association) style is most commonly used for the liberal arts and original essay, humanities. The most recent printed guide on it is the ap bio evolution MLA Handbook (8 th ed.). Writing! Instead of providing individual recommendations for each publishing format (printed, online, e-books etc.), this edition recommends a single universal set of guidelines, which writers can apply to papers purification any kind of source. All formal reports or essays should be typewritten and printed, preferably on a good quality printer. Read the assignment sheet again to original essay be sure that you understand fully what is expected of you, and that your essay meets the requirements as specified by your teacher. Know how your essay will be evaluated. Proofread final paper carefully for spelling, punctuation, missing or duplicated words. Make the effort to ensure that your final paper is clean, tidy, neat, and attractive.

Aim to have your final paper ready a day or two before the deadline. Research! This gives you peace of mind and a chance to triple check. Before handing in your assignment for marking, ask yourself: “Is this the VERY BEST that I can do?”